Stone reliefs found at Göbekli Tepe

A Monumental Cover Up? Why did Gobekli Tepe End Up in the Dirt?

(Read the article on one page)

In the farmlands of southeastern Turkey there is a hill that rises out of the landscape. Unlike the surrounding plateaus, it has a gentle slope like a mound. At its top is a depression which looks like a belly button, hence the name Gobekli Tepe which means “potbelly hill.” Potbelly Hill looks unnatural to the landscape and it is. The depression has been found to be artificial by archaeologists. It is in fact a monumental structure complete with T-shaped pillars and artwork consisting of a variety of predator and prey animals. It was built around 9,000 BC, well before the rise of agriculture and it is this age that has brought its fame, as archaeologists believe that it represents the earliest temple in the world. The temple was mysteriously abandoned around 8,000 BC and filled in with dirt containing scattered human bones. One of the many mysteries regarding the site is why it was abandoned and whether it was buried by nature or by humans.

Massive megaliths of Enclosure D. Credit: Alistair Coombs

Massive megaliths of Enclosure D. Credit: Alistair Coombs

The ‘World’s Oldest Temple’ Conclusion

When the site was first surveyed by archaeologists from Istanbul, it was thought to be little more than an abandoned Medieval cemetery. In 1994, the German archaeologist Klaus Schmidt re-examined the site and found that it was more extraordinary. He discovered a series of limestone pillars in a circle containing artistic depictions of lions, bulls, spiders, scorpions, snakes, gazelles, and donkeys among other creatures. He also found an abundance of stone tools and crushed bones from animals and humans. Based on comparison between artifacts at the site and artifacts found at other sites with known radiocarbon dates, he determined that it was built during the late Paleolithic, when the region was still inhabited by hunter-gatherers.

During the excavation, Schmidt and his collaborators did not find any evidence of regular habitation. There were no hearths, trash pits or other features indicating that people were living there long-term. Based on this evidence, he and other archaeologists have concluded that the site was not a regular habitation site but that it had a special, perhaps religious function. Schmidt in fact believes it was a temple.

The whole area was filled with stones and dirt

The whole area was filled with stones and dirt ( CC BY-SA 3.0 )

The Pre-Agriculture Temple Anomaly

If it is a temple, it is a very interesting site because it appears to go against the archaeological convention that temples and other monumental structures were built after the rise of agriculture. According to archaeological consensus, hunter-gatherer societies did not have the time and resources to build monumental structures. Temples, palaces, and similar institutions did not appear until after the rise of agriculture when a food surplus allowed enough people to leave food production and take to other full-time professions such as construction, masonry, and priesthood.

The ‘Vulture-Stone’. Credit: Alistair Coombs

The ‘Vulture-Stone’. Credit: Alistair Coombs

The age of Gobekli Tepe suggests that agriculture is not required for the emergence of complex societies. Archaeologists Klaus Schmidt and Ian Hodder even go as far as to say that “all our theories are wrong.” Hodder and Schmidt suggest that rather than social complexity being a response to a change in subsistence patterns (ie. foraging to farming), subsistence patterns could have changed to accommodate emerging social complexity. The argument goes that people wanted to build temples, so they eventually developed agriculture to feed the builders.

Besides the fact that this is difficult to prove scientifically, since we can’t get inside the heads of the people who built the Gobleki Tepe complex, the suggestion of there being temples before agriculture might not be such a radical step for archaeology as the above scholars suppose. Archaeologists have known for decades that there were large settlements built by hunter-gatherers who harvested wild grain and hunted wild sheep, goats, and gazelles at places such as Jericho and Ain Ghazal. It has been proposed that these settlements were possible because of the extraordinary abundance of the Fertile Crescent during the late Paleolithic. There was enough wild grain and game that the food surplus necessary to facilitate social complexity could be created without agriculture.

Golbekli Tepe, Stone pillar with animal relief

Golbekli Tepe, Stone pillar with animal relief ( CC BY SA 3.0 )

This is not to say that human ideas could not have played a greater role than previously believed in the rise of civilization, but it is not necessary to completely abandon current archaeological theories regarding the relation between social complexity and subsistence patterns.


The location of this site in Turkey suggests it could have been part of the ancient Sumerian civilization. What if it were a depiction of the species that were put on board the ark? I am not thinking biblical, but an ark that would have been a DNA repository of all the species. I noticed that many of the species depicted are show in a state of repose, not standing or running, particularly the birds... Just a thought, also the layout of the site reminds me of the bowels of a rocket launching pad. Could these pillars have supported some sort of "ship"?

I was somewhat disappointed with the tameness of the article. It simply reiterated the blather of the Archaeological community that has been disseminated for years. By coming to this site I was hoping for a more cutting edge view of this site, rather than the old, "it was a temple". Everything that the archaeologist cannot explain is relegated to the "Temple" category. I think these people, who already have proven that they did not fit the status quo of our narrow minded view of history, did more than eat, sleep and worship. There is every indication that this site served a different purpose. The fact that it was underground, the shape of the pillars that indicates they "supported" something big and heavy, the nature of the carvings and the depiction of animals that we cannot identify points to a function of this site that is outside of our current, mainstream understanding of that era. So why try to slam it into the mold of outdated archaeology??

I once attended a lecture and museum tour of an exhibit of artifacts from Mexico (I don't remember if they were Incan or Mayan) about to open. The archaeologist who led it was quite open about the "we don't really know what this means so we'll call it religious" approach.

One of the exhibits was a small carved stone animal that was wearing a human mask over its face. He mentioned religion. I spoke up and talked about how on the Day of the Dead celebrations in modern day Mexico people often wear animal masks. Perhaps, I suggested, If that tradition went far enough back, this sculpture was intended as a joke showing an animal wearing a human mask, rather like the infamous painting of the dogs playing poker. He laughed and said it was as good an explanation as any. I then went on to suggest that it could also be a serious piece of art as a commentary meant to remind us that humans are also animals underneath the mask of civilization. He liked that interpretation as well.

Later at the reception I got to share a more personal story with him. I told him about how my husband and I had visited Mayan ruins on our honeymoon and how at Chichen Itza I stood behind the statue of the reclining Chac Mool on one of the temples and crouched down to see what he was looking at. I stood up and told my husband he was looking at the ball court and his position suddenly made sense to me. He was watching the game and had a bowl of Doritos on his tummy! My husband said at the time that I was not taking this seriously enough, but the lecturer had a great laugh and said he was going to use it in his next talk.

Assigning ritual and religious value to things we don't understand has a long history in our species.

Presumption, best guess, call it what you will, but that's all anyone can offer in regard to ancient sites. Unless a person was actually there when the site was being constructed or used, then presumption is the best anyone can do.It just annoys me that these highbrow academics can't use plain English and say it's a best guess, instead they use pseudo floral language like,"they believe" that so-and -so is several thousand years old or whatever, or just admit that you don't have a clue!

Unfortunately the closest thing we have to first hand witness to ancient sites like this are the oral traditions
(aka myths and legends) handed down from generation to generation until they were written back down using a completely different alphabet. Since oral tradition is rife with change, both inadvertent and deliberate, main stream historians just dismiss it completely as fiction.

I'm willing to bet that if someone who was an expert in Turkish and/or Indo-European mythology took as unbiased a look as could be possible at this site in comparison to the oldest of myths, we could have a better understanding as to what it really was trying to tell us.


Register to become part of our active community, get updates, receive a monthly newsletter, and enjoy the benefits and rewards of our member point system OR just post your comment below as a Guest.

Top New Stories

Artist’s representation of Vanaheimr.
In a realm of nine worlds, one might assume that the gods would be satisfied with one. One world where they could live away from humans and watch over their antics as one might watch a TV show. In the mythology of the Norse, however, one world for the gods is not enough because the gods themselves are divided.

Myths & Legends

The Last of the Siberian Unicorns: What Happened to the Mammoth-Sized One-Horned Beasts of Legend?
Elasmotherium, also known as the Giant Rhinoceros or the Giant Siberian Unicorn, is an extinct species of rhino that lived in the Eurasian area in the Late Pliocene and Pleistocene eras. They have been documented from 2.6 million years ago, but the most recent fossils come from around 29,000 years ago.

Ancient Technology

Yacouba Sawadogo planting.
Desertification is a serious problem facing numerous countries in the world today. Various measures have been taken to counter the negative effects, with some providing better results than others. A farmer in Burkina Faso looked to his ancestors and came up with an innovative solution.

Ancient Places

Stonehenge at night.
In the 1960s, a portion of a ditch excavated into chalk bedrock west of the henge at Stonehenge was discovered during construction for the pedestrian underpass that provided access to Stonehenge until a year ago. By 2014, geophysical testing confirmed that the ditch stretches over 900 meters (2952.7 ft.) from southwest of the Stonehenge henge to a point near the south ditch line of the Greater Cursus, northwest of Stonehenge.

Our Mission

At Ancient Origins, we believe that one of the most important fields of knowledge we can pursue as human beings is our beginnings. And while some people may seem content with the story as it stands, our view is that there exists countless mysteries, scientific anomalies and surprising artifacts that have yet to be discovered and explained.

The goal of Ancient Origins is to highlight recent archaeological discoveries, peer-reviewed academic research and evidence, as well as offering alternative viewpoints and explanations of science, archaeology, mythology, religion and history around the globe.

We’re the only Pop Archaeology site combining scientific research with out-of-the-box perspectives.

By bringing together top experts and authors, this archaeology website explores lost civilizations, examines sacred writings, tours ancient places, investigates ancient discoveries and questions mysterious happenings. Our open community is dedicated to digging into the origins of our species on planet earth, and question wherever the discoveries might take us. We seek to retell the story of our beginnings. 

Ancient Image Galleries

View from the Castle Gate (Burgtor). (Public Domain)
Door surrounded by roots of Tetrameles nudiflora in the Khmer temple of Ta Phrom, Angkor temple complex, located today in Cambodia. (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Cable car in the Xihai (West Sea) Grand Canyon (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Next article