Illustration from "Mundus subterraneus" - suggesting that fossil bones were from giants

The Establishment Has Already Acknowledged a Lost Race of Giants - Part 2

(Read the article on one page)

Following the discovery of burials in her own flower garden, Murray embarked on an archaeological odyssey of her own. In 1921, she published an article for the American Anthropologist, noting that the femur, jaw, and teeth of one of the seven-foot skeletons was then still in the Tioga Point Museum. Also included are references to many skeletons between 6 and 7 feet tall, with photographs of artifacts, pottery, and the in situ burial of one of the “above 6ft” burials. The article also features a photograph of the “Paul Scott Collection”, described as “a multiplicity of small artifacts, suggesting a race of pygmies” which included a “miniature amulet and sinker stones.” (Aboriginal Sites In And Near “Teaoga”, in American Anthropologist 23(2) 1921).

Regardless of the disparagement of amateurs, historians, and antiquarians, the credentials of Webb, Snow, and Dragoo have never been brought into question. With so many researchers scrambling today to discover irrefutable evidence of gigantic or otherwise anomalous beings to prove their existence, the authors question why they do not simply present the works of William S Webb and Don Dragoo to anthropologists, and more importantly, their audiences.

While the concept of a mysterious and undiscovered race may create an air of sensationalism healthy for selling books and DVDs, we feel that it is of far more relevance to demonstrate that the Unique Physical Types were discovered by professionals all the way up through the 20 th century, even after the institutionalized policy of denial, and yet the establishment continues to deny their own documented evidence and the truth.

Featured image: Illustration from "Mundus subterraneus" - suggesting that fossil bones were from giants ( Wikimedia Commons ).

By Jason Jarrell and Sarah Farmer


The Dover Mound, William S Webb and Charles Snow 1959. The measurement of the giant is on page 22, the burial census is on pages 29-32, and the dental anomalies are photographed on page 43.

Mortuary Variability in the Middle Big Darby Drainage of Central Ohio Between 300 BC and 300 AD Volume 1, Bruce Aument.

Ohio Archaeologist, 10 (4), Oct 1960. Article and photograph on pages 140-141.

The Adena People, No 2, by Webb and Baby.

The Archaeological History of Ohio, by Gerald Fowke, page 372.

Mounds for the Dead, by Don Dragoo (1963). Burial 54 is measured and described on page 67, and an actual photograph of the skeleton in situ appears on page 50.

A History of Old Tioga Point and Early Athens, Pennsylvania, by Louis Welles Murray. Large Skeletons appear in the text around page 200. Page 203 features a photo of a large type in situ.

Aboriginal Sites In And Near “Teaoga”, Now Athens, Pennsylvania, in American Anthropologist 23(2) 1921 page 183. The article features a photo of the “pygmy artifacts”.


the Nephilim, children on the fallen angels. The elongated skulls makes them look alien, in human body. The Paracas elongated skull, came back with results that had unknown mtDNA, I wonder if these skulls would be the same.

These anomalies are most definitely a product of a disorder altering the production of growth hormone, or somatotrophic hormone.

I believe this is clear, as hypersecretion leads to Gigantism even in children. In adults it causes a condition known as Acromegaly, which results in enlarged hands, jawbone and brows, just as is described of these giants throughout these two articles. This disorder arises from the anterior lobe of the pituitary gland beneath the hypothalamus in the brain.

It is an absolutely fascinating topic and it is a shame that scientist so often refuse to remain impartial. This closed mindedness only results in a loss of knowledge for mankind.

Yes acromegaly comes to mind. And moreover, 7 foot tall without hormonal disturbance is not that rare. Peter the Great , of Russia was over 6'7'' and well built.

Tall men have always produced a great charismatic impression over normal sized people. Just look at average size of political leaders. Of course there are exceptions.

Peter Harrap's picture

I have read parts 1 and 2, all of it. There is whining about a cover-up of this information- but it was freely available: you just had to ask!!

Second, as there are nowhere here noted individuals above 7 feet in height, and as there are several tribes where such heights are the norm, why the fuss?

People habitually grow big and strong if there diets are good and they exercise enough. You might like to examine records of average heights among those born in the UK during and after WW2. when bread sugar and meat were rationed. Meat was rationed in the UK until 1954. Etcetera.Diet affects height, as well as girth!!


I am already kicking myself for getting involved in this discussion. I do so in case someone might be steered away from believing this silliness. Why do the people who subjected us to this discussion have so little regard for formal training and years of study involving field work and the reading of thousands of books and articles? To hear them tell it our observations are not worth anything more than a 19th century ditch digger and probably not as much, since we are apparently involved in a conspiracy to hide the evidence of the fairy-tale world they like to believe obtained in North America in Pre-Columbian times. Why would we want to do that? Most of us are not involved in religion so have no religious position to defend. Were we to find a real honest-to-goodness giant (not just someone within the range of modern populations such as those reported from Dover Mound, but the fairy-tale kind as in the drawing illustrating this entry) it would be a real boon for our career.

In addition to maligning the anthropological community as a bunch of people covering up the truth, they have presumed to comment on subject about which they know nothing as if using terms like "gigantic humanoids (as if these Indians were not humans) in reference to professional "admissions"

and present a number of references as if they support their argument when they often say their impression was that the average height of the skeletons was approximately six feet or that the people buried in a particular mound were gigantic. They present as evidence that a woman thought the small stone artifacts she found on her farm were possibly made by Pygmies! If they knew the first thing about archaeology they would know that small stone tools and weapons (microliths) were associated with numerous cultures across time and space and the associated skeletons were standard-sized modern humans. Of course, that does not prove the finds discussed as evidence were not made by pygmies or leprechauns, for that matter, but there is reason to believe neither is the case. It is telling that they have the authors and dates wrong for Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley when they picture its frontice of the Marietta group . It is possibly the most famous single book on North American archaeology. They even make a questionable reference to Squire and Davies, the actual authors.

Since we all know we can find 7' people on any NBA court and many, if not most, university basketball courts and they are members of our species, does that mean we are all members of a race of gigantic humanoids? One more thing, having someone draw a sketch of a gigantic Indian is not proof that there was a race of gigantic humanoids.
I understand the authors are probably not open to reason. This essay shows how desperate they are to make a case for which there is no evidence. Doubtless the people in their community will feel they have written a scholarly work and give them kudos for it, but it is to be hoped that people who are not already believers will not be taken in by this demonstrably absurd presentation. Of course, they have every right to their own opinions but they do not have the right to their own facts.


Register to become part of our active community, get updates, receive a monthly newsletter, and enjoy the benefits and rewards of our member point system OR just post your comment below as a Guest.

Myths & Legends

Our Mission

At Ancient Origins, we believe that one of the most important fields of knowledge we can pursue as human beings is our beginnings. And while some people may seem content with the story as it stands, our view is that there exists countless mysteries, scientific anomalies and surprising artifacts that have yet to be discovered and explained.

The goal of Ancient Origins is to highlight recent archaeological discoveries, peer-reviewed academic research and evidence, as well as offering alternative viewpoints and explanations of science, archaeology, mythology, religion and history around the globe.

We’re the only Pop Archaeology site combining scientific research with out-of-the-box perspectives.

By bringing together top experts and authors, this archaeology website explores lost civilizations, examines sacred writings, tours ancient places, investigates ancient discoveries and questions mysterious happenings. Our open community is dedicated to digging into the origins of our species on planet earth, and question wherever the discoveries might take us. We seek to retell the story of our beginnings. 

Ancient Image Galleries

View from the Castle Gate (Burgtor). (Public Domain)
Door surrounded by roots of Tetrameles nudiflora in the Khmer temple of Ta Phrom, Angkor temple complex, located today in Cambodia. (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Cable car in the Xihai (West Sea) Grand Canyon (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Next article