I agree with Tsurugi! If the evidence is plausible then the possibility that these “ Negev Desert dwellers” were in fact the ancient Israelites shouldn’t be ignored by archeologists.
Many see what they want to see. When we first saw the 'face' on Mars, I couldn't believe the intelligence, or lack of it, from thousands of people thinking it was anything more than the sun on a piece of rock, but there we have it.
This article is full of lies:
1) As Catalan I must say that our lenguage is spoken today in Catalonia for around 3 million people, thnaks to the supporting effort of Spain...please be careful with figures
2) In the 8th century there was a muslim invasion in all the territory of Spain, Barcelona was also muslim for about 100 years and Carlomagno and the french people call Cathalaunic to the same territoryof Castle ...Castilla de central de region of Spain, so that Cathalaunic means "Spain". Ples read an inform yourself a little bit more
3) Never exist such athing like an "independent" county as tthe counties were parto France first and Aragon Kingdom later, to read some Spanish history could be convenient....and so on, so on
"The washed-up artifacts dated to around 90 BC, a time when the Roman Empire ruled the Anatolia region and before it became Byzantine under Islamic rule."
The Byzantine and Islamic/Ottoman periods in the history of this region are distinct. The Byzantine period refers to the period after the administrative division of the Roman Empire into East and West and after the collapse of the Western portion. The Byzantines never called themselves this as they were "Romans." It is a construct of convenience among historians. The Byzantine Empire was Christian, specifically the Eastern Orthodox Church. It was never Islamic. Please correct your article.
I know only one thing. The world deserves to see the Tomb of Alexander. I would also like to see the Tomb of a man who visited India in BC. It's surprising that the discovery may lead to complications in Greece. What is so complicated with a man who died centuries ago? Let the actual occupant of the Tomb be revealed to the world. Greece may also get benefit from it in terms of money along with the government of Egypt. Why to keep whole world waiting when it will be surely excavated sometime in future? Nothing remains hidden forever.
I'll give you another translation. When I say the word "you" when talking about you, do I only mean the conscious mind? Don't we all have a Subconscious, Conscious and Superconscious mind. So when talking about an entity of over 2000 years ago man didn't have and science at the time could he have been trying to put things into context. Could Elohim, be in fact an entity composed of many conscious minds. I mean man could have literally written "And God made man to look like Him", but he didn't, he wrote down, "So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them." Could image be really DNA image, but man of 2000 years ago didn't have the context to write about DNA. Wouldn't it have been easier to say God made man to look like Him if that was the real meaning?
Similar problem where I live. Catamounts (mountain lions) are supposed to be extinct here despite numerous eye witness reports and photos and despite the admission on the QT by wildlife rangers.
In the christian "Record of the Nephites" there is written about an ancient civilation in that area which was destroyed at the time of the Tower of Babylon.
The famous Father Crespi got alot of stuff from indians from kept secret underground tunnels and caves which belonged to ancient civilation.
This material is judged to be mostly babylonian style and in theRecord of the Nephites there is written "at the time of the Tower of Babylon".
One can only assume that if there were birth/death records available, the researcher would have consulted them and the whole premise of this bit of research would be moot. I sincerely doubt there were any parish records between 475 and 625 AD. I doubt the concept of the parish had even come about yet. The Romans were still finishing their decline and Merry Olde was still very, very backward and I doubt the comings and goings of the commoners were at all noteworthy.
I always thought estimates of age came from parish records. I understand that records were not kept as meticulously as they are today, but births and deaths were recorded. Matching those records up to the "wear-and-tear-on-the-teeth" method would do much to validate it, I think.
Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.
I agree with Tsurugi! If the evidence is plausible then the possibility that these “ Negev Desert dwellers” were in fact the ancient Israelites shouldn’t be ignored by archeologists.
It seem as though I always tend to attract angry ignorant people to my posts because the truth really hurts them the most...
It is Fake made out of Brass. It was NEVER made in Ancient Rome.
In reply, I think I'll just quote part of your first sentence.
"Ignorant minded people always post their ignorant racist beliefs..."
Couldn't agree more with the concluding paragraphs. Well said.
Many see what they want to see. When we first saw the 'face' on Mars, I couldn't believe the intelligence, or lack of it, from thousands of people thinking it was anything more than the sun on a piece of rock, but there we have it.
This article is full of lies:
1) As Catalan I must say that our lenguage is spoken today in Catalonia for around 3 million people, thnaks to the supporting effort of Spain...please be careful with figures
2) In the 8th century there was a muslim invasion in all the territory of Spain, Barcelona was also muslim for about 100 years and Carlomagno and the french people call Cathalaunic to the same territoryof Castle ...Castilla de central de region of Spain, so that Cathalaunic means "Spain". Ples read an inform yourself a little bit more
3) Never exist such athing like an "independent" county as tthe counties were parto France first and Aragon Kingdom later, to read some Spanish history could be convenient....and so on, so on
forgot to add that whoever wrote this article didnt do a good job. At all. I mean the name of the site is rediscovering humanit's past....
The original version of Adam and Eve is NOT from the hebrew bible but around 800 years older and was found on clay tablets in Ugarit.
It was simply copied and parts altered (made misognystic) where necessary.
Does this prove that the Genesis is not the word of god? Very likely. ;)
Breathe in. Then breathe out. You have just pronounced God's name. Ugh! Tsk Tsk Tsk. YHWH. Sigh.
"The washed-up artifacts dated to around 90 BC, a time when the Roman Empire ruled the Anatolia region and before it became Byzantine under Islamic rule."
The Byzantine and Islamic/Ottoman periods in the history of this region are distinct. The Byzantine period refers to the period after the administrative division of the Roman Empire into East and West and after the collapse of the Western portion. The Byzantines never called themselves this as they were "Romans." It is a construct of convenience among historians. The Byzantine Empire was Christian, specifically the Eastern Orthodox Church. It was never Islamic. Please correct your article.
Yes, unfortunately it is not available on kindle. But you can read a lot more about their work here: www.goldenageproject.org.uk
I know only one thing. The world deserves to see the Tomb of Alexander. I would also like to see the Tomb of a man who visited India in BC. It's surprising that the discovery may lead to complications in Greece. What is so complicated with a man who died centuries ago? Let the actual occupant of the Tomb be revealed to the world. Greece may also get benefit from it in terms of money along with the government of Egypt. Why to keep whole world waiting when it will be surely excavated sometime in future? Nothing remains hidden forever.
Interesting article. I wish their book was available as a kindle as I would like to read more on this subject
I'll give you another translation. When I say the word "you" when talking about you, do I only mean the conscious mind? Don't we all have a Subconscious, Conscious and Superconscious mind. So when talking about an entity of over 2000 years ago man didn't have and science at the time could he have been trying to put things into context. Could Elohim, be in fact an entity composed of many conscious minds. I mean man could have literally written "And God made man to look like Him", but he didn't, he wrote down, "So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them." Could image be really DNA image, but man of 2000 years ago didn't have the context to write about DNA. Wouldn't it have been easier to say God made man to look like Him if that was the real meaning?
Similar problem where I live. Catamounts (mountain lions) are supposed to be extinct here despite numerous eye witness reports and photos and despite the admission on the QT by wildlife rangers.
In the christian "Record of the Nephites" there is written about an ancient civilation in that area which was destroyed at the time of the Tower of Babylon.
The famous Father Crespi got alot of stuff from indians from kept secret underground tunnels and caves which belonged to ancient civilation.
This material is judged to be mostly babylonian style and in theRecord of the Nephites there is written "at the time of the Tower of Babylon".
I like supernatural theories, but could it be that this animal escaped from a zoo or an owner? Unlikely I guess.
One can only assume that if there were birth/death records available, the researcher would have consulted them and the whole premise of this bit of research would be moot. I sincerely doubt there were any parish records between 475 and 625 AD. I doubt the concept of the parish had even come about yet. The Romans were still finishing their decline and Merry Olde was still very, very backward and I doubt the comings and goings of the commoners were at all noteworthy.
I always thought estimates of age came from parish records. I understand that records were not kept as meticulously as they are today, but births and deaths were recorded. Matching those records up to the "wear-and-tear-on-the-teeth" method would do much to validate it, I think.
Pages