All  
Ancient Chinese palace in Siberia

What was an ancient Chinese palace doing in the enemy territory of Siberia?

Print

Located in the majestic Altai-Sayan Mountains in the south of Siberia, the city of Abakan has a long and rich history going back thousands of years. But in the 1940s, archaeologists found something near Abakan, that was entirely unexpected – the 2,000-year-old remains of a palace typical of the Han Dynasty in China. What was so unusual about this discovery was the fact that, not only was the palace hundreds of miles away from the region of the Han Empire, it was also located in territory that belonged to their arch-enemy, the Xiongnu.

The Xiongnu were a nomadic pastoral people who formed a great tribal league that came to dominate much of Central Asia from the 3 rd century BC until the 2 nd century AD.  The Xiongnu were a constant threat to China’s northern borders. In fact, it was their repeated invasions that prompted the small kingdoms of North China to begin erecting barriers, in what later became the Great Wall of China.

The Xiongnu civilization and the Han Empire in conflict

The Xiongnu civilization and the Han Empire frequently clashed in military conflicts. Henan Museum .

The discovery of the palace was first made in 1941 when Russian construction workers were clearing a track from Abakan, the capital city of Russia’s Khakassia Republic, to the village of Askyz, and found the buried foundations of a ruined building.  When the site was excavated by archaeologists over the following four years, they found something highly unusual – the remains of a large palace typical of the Han Empire (206 BC – 220 AD).

The building was found to be oriented precisely to the cardinal: from east to west. Its length was 45 meters from north to south and its width, 35 meters. In the centre of the palace was a large square room (12 by 12 metres). The palace consisted of twenty rooms and one hall. The floor and walls of the palace were made of mud. In the central part, the walls reached up to 2.2 metres in thickness, while the walls of the side chambers were somewhat thinner. Another feature of the building was the heating system located under the floor of the rooms. This whole system of branched channels made from stone slabs allowed heat to be distributed throughout the palace via the hot air from the furnace.

A sketch showing the layout of the palace in Abrakan

A sketch showing the layout of the palace in Abrakan. Image source .

Archaeologists found the remains of many Chinese style roof tiles, some of which bore inscriptions typical of the era of the Han Dynasty.  On all these tiles was written the same text: "Son of Heaven (ie the Chinese emperor), 10,000 years of peace, and one of which (i.e. the empress), we wish 1,000 autumns of joy without sorrow."

The doors of the central hall were decorated with massive bronze cast mascarons, decoration in the form of a sculpted face, with handles in the form of horned rams. The ringed-handle passed through the nose of the ram.

Tiles with Chinese inscription from the palace near Abakan

Left: Tiles with Chinese inscription from the palace near Abakan. Right: The mascaron doorknob. Image source .

Among the other exacavated artifacts at the palace, archaeologists found jade vase fragments, gold earrings, bronze ware, pottery, knives, belt buckles, plow lines, stone carvings of elephants and animal heads, and a range of tools that would have been used in its construction. It is unclear where these artifacts are now located. Hopefully, they have been preserved and protected.

Architectural impression of the palace near Abakan

Architectural impression of the palace near Abakan. Credit: GB Shchukin. Image source .

The discovery of the palace sparked a lively debate regarding how the palace and its high-ranking occupants came to live not only far away from the Han homeland, but also in enemy territory.

Russian scholars like S V Kiselev and L R Kyzlasov have proposed that the palace belonged to ancient Chinese General Li Ling, who had been defeated by the Xiongnu and possibly defected to them as a result. Li Ling had led a force of 30,000 Han warriors against Xiongnu raiders in 99 BC, leading to the complete decimation of his army. Only 400 of Li Ling’s troops made it back alive to Han territory.

It was initially believed that Li Ling had died on the battlefield, which would have been the most ‘noble’ end for a defeated general. However, it was later discovered that Li Ling had surrendered to the Xiongnu, and rumour quickly spread that he was a traitor and had defected, although there is little evidence to support this claim. When news reached the ruler of the Han Dynasty, Emperor Wu, he ordered the Li family to be severely punished. The theory goes that news of the harsh treatment of his family reached an imprisoned Li Ling, who then did defect and, in an act of revenge against the Emperor, began training Xiongnu warriors in Han battle techniques. Presumably, Li Ling was eventually accepted by the Xiongnu, allowing him to construct his palace in their territory.

While this opinion has remained popular, other views have been expressed as well. More recently, for example, it was claimed by A. A. Kovalyov, that the palace was the residence of Lu Fang, a Han throne pretender from the Guangwu era in the 1 st century AD. According to records, Lu Fang claimed he was a descendant of a Han Emperor and fought to become legal Emperor of China. However, he later raised a revolt and defected to Xiongnu. According to the Hou Han Shu, the official records of the Later Han Dynasty compiled by Fan Ye (5 th century AD), he lived with his family in Xiongnu for 10 years until his death.  This theory is supported by Chinese scholar Chen Zhi, who claims a character used in the tile inscriptions can be dated to the period 9 – 23 AD, much too late to have been Li Ling.

While both theories are plausible, the fact remains that scholars still cannot say within any certainty, who the Chinese palace belonged to, and what it was doing in the land of the Xiongnu.

Featured image: The Altai-Sayan Mountains in the south of Siberia. Bottom Right: A reconstruction of the Chinese palace in Abakan museum. Image source .

References:

Southern Siberia in antiquity: The footsteps of ancient cultures, from the Volga to the Pacific Ocean – L A Evtyuhova

Abakan – Princeton.edu

Xiongnu – Encyclopaedia Britannica

Abakan Palace Ruins – Baike Baidu

How Did An Ancient Chinese Palace End Up In Siberia? – China Topix

Kovalyov, A. A. (2007).  Chinese Emperor on the Yenisy? Once Again About the Owner of the Tashebik "Palace" . The Ethnohistory and Archaeology of Northern Eurasia: Theory, Methods, and Practice ] (in Russian). Irkutsk, Russian. pp. 145–148

By April Holloway

Register to become part of our active community, get updates, receive a monthly newsletter, and enjoy the benefits and rewards of our member point system OR just post your comment below as a Guest.

Next article