Invisible Blue: The Color That Ancient People Could Not See
We have all been told to be ‘careful what we wish for’ or that we ‘only see what we look for’ and maybe some of you have had past partners who claimed that you ‘took them for granted and made them invisible’. The most conservative of us might deem these types of phrases as subjective and belonging to self-help books, but when we look back in to history evidence confirms that humans are fully capable of making physical appearances invisible if we do not concentrate on them, even something as fundamental to reality as a color. The color blue in particular…
Different Views See Different Hues
The human visual system allows us to see a range of around one million colors, yet we really can’t determine how differently we all perceive these colors. Blue is the color of the sky, bodies of water, probably a wall in your office ,and a T-shirt, but a recent research paper discussed in Science Alert explained that until relatively recently in human history nobody saw the color “blue.”
Until relatively recently in human history nobody saw the color “blue.” ( Светлана Фарафонова / Adobe Stock)
That is to say “blue” didn’t exist, at least not in the way we think of it today. This is not some smart play on words either; Kevin Loria reported for Business Insider back in 2015 that “the evidence for people not seeing blue dates all the way back to the 1800s.”
We’re NOT Talking About “The Dress”
Before we move on, many of you will be drifting to the 2015 internet sensation “the dress.” Let’s get that out of the way. Hundreds of millions of viewers disagreed over whether the colored bands on the following dress were black and blue, or white and gold. This phenomenon revealed differences in human color perception and it is NOT the same thing as the claim that the color blue “never existed” in history.
The Dress photograph that made millions of i nternet users argue about the colors present. ( Fair Use )
An Ancient Absence of the Color Blue
The story of “blue being invisible in history” begins in 1858 when William Gladstone, who later became Chancellor of the Exchequer then Prime Minister of Great Britain, read Homer’s The Odyssey . Gladstone noticed that Homer described the sea color as "wine-dark” - leading him to ask the question; why not “deep blue?” Gladstone investigated this curiosity and counted the color references in The Odyssey finding that while black was mentioned almost 200 times, and white about 100, blue did not appear once. Broadening his research he then determined that “blue” didn't exist anywhere in Greek writing. Nowhere.
German Jewish philosopher and philologist Lazarus Geiger passionately followed up on Gladstone’s observations and analyzed ancient Icelandic sagas, the Koran, Hindu, Chinese folklore, Arabic, and an ancient Hebrew version of the Bible. His studies discovered that ‘blue’ was never mentioned once in any of these cultures and he wrote:
"These hymns, of more than ten thousand lines, are brimming with descriptions of the heavens. Scarcely any subject is evoked more frequently. The sun and reddening dawn's play of color, day and night, cloud and lightning, the air and ether, all these are unfolded before us, again and again ... but there is one thing no one would ever learn from these ancient songs ... and that is that the sky is blue.”
- Death by Wallpaper: When Arsenic in the Walls Was Killing Children
- Mummy Brown – the 16th century paint made from ground up mummies
- Piece of Ancient Fabric Revealed True Source of Biblical Blue Dye Lost for 1,300 Years
Paint on canvas on plywood. L'accord bleu (RE 10) , 1960, mixed media piece by Yves Klein (1928–1962). Featuring IKB pigment on canvas and sponges. ( CC BY-SA 3.0 )
Was the Color Blue Really Invisible to the Ancients?
Not having words for blue, scientists had to consider that maybe ancient people didn’t see the color, thus not having descriptors for it. Were ancient people’s eyes different from ours? Why didn’t people see blue?
It is not known exactly what was going through Homer's mind when he described the “wine-dark” sea, but ancient people definitely had the same optical biology and capability to see blue that we do today. But do we really ‘not see’ things if we don't have words for them? The answer is no. Because there was no ‘blue’ as a category of color in the way that we define it, the color wasn't distinguished from green.
The Blur of Blue and Green
Searching to discover when "blue" started to appear in language as a color in its own right, Geiger discovered a pattern repeated all over the world; every language first had words for black and white, representing darkness and light and soon after people used a word for red, the color of blood and wine. The next colors to appear in language were yellow then green and the last color to appear in every language across the globe was blue.
In 2006, Jules Davidoff, a psychologist from Goldsmiths University of London, conducted a research project with members of the Himba tribe from Namibia, whose language neither has a word for blue nor distinguishes between green and blue. According to a BBC documentary (which has since been accused of over-dramatizing the results) members of the tribe were tested to find out if they could actually see blue or not by showing them a special pattern; a circle with 11 green squares and one blue square.
Left: Namibian trib al herders who participated in the Himba color experiment. ( CC BY-SA 3.0 ) Right: Dustin Stevenson color test titled "The last color term", 4/25/2013).
While it is very obvious to us, most of the Himba tribe members had more difficulty in telling Davidoff which of the squares was a different color. And those participants who noticed a difference took “much longer and made more mistakes” than you or I who can clearly and quickly spot the blue square. Not only did the experiment seem to confirm that language did affect what we perceive, it also revealed that the Himba language had many more descriptive words, terms and concepts for types of green than in English.
Without a word for a particular color, there is no way of identifying it as different to the others close to it; and it is perceived as a shade of another color. So before blue became defined with a word, humans saw blue things as being shades of green.
You can discover more about how language shapes our ability to detect color in Kevin Loria's article at Business Insider, and in this fascinating RadioLab episode , which inspired his feature.
What About the Creation of the Color Blue?
Ancient Egyptian society was the first to adopt a word for the color blue because they were the first culture to produce blue dyes. The famous color “ Egyptian blue ” appears in artwork such as the tombs of Mereruka from the Old Kingdom (2600-2100 BC) and it is almost exactly the same blue as was found in a coffin dating from the Greco-Roman period (330 BC-AD 400), confirming well developed and standardized production systems being passed over two thousand years.
Cup containing Egyptian Blue pigment from Pompeii. Egyptian blue, also known as calcium copper silicate, or CaCuSi 4O10, or cuprorivaite, is considered to be the first synthetic pigment ever developed. (Dan Diffendale /CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 )
Blue came to represent the river Nile, the sky, and later the universe, creation, and fertility. The only natural source of blue was the rare and expensive mineral lapis lazuli which was mined in what is now Afghanistan. Vitruvius, the 1st century Roman architect and writer said that “sand, copper (from a mineral such as azurite or malachite) and natron (a naturally occurring mixture of sodium compounds, including sodium carbonate) were the ingredients.”
- Experts discover traces of rare artificial pigment on Egyptian mummy portraits and panel paintings
- Han Purple: A 2,800-year-old artificial pigment that quantum physicists are trying to understand
- Dressed to Kill: The Vibrant Textiles Adorning these Incan Mummies Have a Lethal Secret
What Else are We Blind To?
To think that we didn’t see blue because we didn’t have a word for it makes one ask, what might we be looking at every day and night, right under our noses, that we can’t see because we don’t have a word for it? Well, ironically, one answer to this question is…more blue!
In 2017, Oregon State University (OSU) chemist Mas Subramanian discovered “YInMn blue” named after the elements Yttrium, Indium, and Manganese, during experimentation “with materials for electronics applications.” According to the OSU press release , the beautiful blue was discovered through a chemistry lab accident back in 2009 and is now going into the marketplace. “It was serendipity, actually; a happy, accidental discovery,” Subramanian said in the paper .
Photograph of “YInMn Blue” as synthesized in 2017 by the (OSU) chemist Mas Subramanian and his team in the laboratory. ( CC BY-SA 4.0 )
While this new blue looks similar to “L'accord bleu” (shown earlier), and “cobalt blue,” its properties “are stronger and more durable” according to Subramanian. Formed by a unique crystal structure that allows the manganese ions to absorb red and green wavelengths of light, the pigment only reflects blue.
This deep, vibrant blue is so durable “and its compounds are so stable even in oil and water” that the new pigment’s versatility has a variety of commercial applications in paints. For example, “to keep buildings cool by reflecting infrared light...[and] keeping with our requirements for sustainability, none of the new blue pigment’s ingredients are toxic,” according to the OSU press release.
Top image: Ancients seemed to have problems seeing or recognizing the color blue. Source: Kokhanchikov /Adobe Stock
By Ashley Cowie
Updated on March 4, 2021.
Geiger, Lazarus (1880). Contributions to the History of the Development of the Human Race. Trübner & Company.
Hill, J., 2010. Meaning of Blue in Ancient Egypt. [Online]
Available at: http://ancientegyptonline.co.uk/colourblue.html
Liberman, Mark, ‘It’s Not Easy Seeing Green.‘ Available at: http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=17970
Loria, Kevin, ‘No one could see the colour blue until modern times.’ Business Insider, 2015. Available at:
Lundeburg, Steve, ‘Pigment discovered at Oregon State University inspires new Crayola crayon color.’ Oregon State University, 2017. Available at: https://today.oregonstate.edu/archives/2017/may/pigment-discovered-oregon-state-university-inspires-new-crayola-crayon-color
MacDonald, Fiona, ‘There's Evidence Humans Didn't Actually See Blue Until Modern Times.’
Science Alert. Available at: https://www.sciencealert.com/humans-didn-t-see-the-colour-blue-until-modern-times-evidence-science
McLean, Sara, ‘Scientists discover a New, Brilliant Blue.’ Dunn-Edwards Paints, 2016. Available at:
‘Colors.’ (Podcast) www.radiolab.org/story/211119-colors/
Blue eyes are something.
Nobody gets paid to tell the truth.
Got really worried that I couldn’t pick out the blue square on the colour-wheel.
Then realised that my screen was in “night light” mode.
The Torah, which is about 3700 years old, has a term for blue: techelet. We know that they could distinguish blue from other colors because there are specific words for purple (argaman), red (adam), scarlet (tolaat hashani, “second worm”), green (yirok, although the torah uses yerek for plants), and black (shachor). I have read previous articles that state the Greeks thought of the sea as like wine and black. Hebrews saw green and blue as separate colors and did not describe the sea as black, but blue. Green is often found in reference to plants, not in reference to dyes. Blue was used extensively in ceremonial objects, derived from a sea snail extract and produced a dye that was supposed to represent the sky and the sea (shamayim and mayim). So, I find this line of investigation questionable when applied broadly and may only be specific to certain cultures.
How we see and describe colour is as much a linguistic and cultural thing as anything. Celtic colours, as in previous comment, do not match quite with modern English. Even older English colours from Saxon and Norse, which survive in adjectives for animals, are different to modern perceptions – a ‘brown’ cow is called ‘red’, a ‘white’ horse is ‘grey’, a ‘grey’ cat is’blue’, etc.
In Russian there are two colour names which are used for what we call blue, similar to the difference perhaps between red and pink. Russians have no problem telling the difference, I can’t always get it right which is very frustrating!
The traditional Scottish Gaelic for blue (gorm, pronounced gor-om) is more accurately describable as blue-green. Grass is gorm (or blue-green). Green (uaine) is more yellow-green.
Dearg is red and was also pink, but not for red hair, which is rufous (ruadh - where the Scottish name 'Roy' comes from). Grey hair (liath) is also different from grey (glas).
Our colour perceptions are part cultural and part physiological. When I say our family car is blue, my wife says it is green. What best fits it is gorm. Technically, we're both right.