All  
The Visit of the Queen of Sheba to King Solomon

King Solomon’s Mines Discovered: Kings and Pharaohs - Part I

Print

Have King Solomon's Mines really been discovered? Yes, indeed. In fact, they have been known about for centuries, and modern archaeological work on them started way back in the early 19th century. But the site’s true significance has never been realized before, and so their role in biblical and popular history has never been fully understood. And that lacuna in our understanding has stemmed from one fundamental problem—we still do not know who King David and King Solomon really were, nor where their capital city was. And so before we can find the legendary gold mines of these famous monarchs, we need to find their true identity.

Mystery Men: King David and King Solomon

How can this be, readers may well ask—how can the identities of King David and King Solomon be 'unknown'?

Well, one of the primary problems for Judaeo-Christian theologians is the disturbing reality that the most celebrated kings of Judaic history, cannot be found in the historical record. While that may sound unlikely, recent archaeology in this region by professors Israel Finkelstein and Neil Silberman has demonstrated that Judaea was very sparsely populated during the United Monarchy era, while Jerusalem itself was ‘little more than a village’.

So the central problem that bedevils all historical research into the United Monarchy is obvious: the Tanakh (the Old Testament) describes an influential nation and a wealthy society that simply could not have existed in this early era. Kings David and Solomon were supposed to have been the most influential and wealthiest monarchs in the entire region, who had subordinate monarchs paying them tribute in gold and spices, and yet the archaeology says this is impossible. So how did the Jewish people manage to 'mislay' the region's most famous monarchs? The only conclusion that archaeologists can logically come to, is that the Tanakh is a complete fiction and kings David and Solomon did not exist.

Painting illustrating David, King of Israel.

Painting illustrating David, King of Israel. ( Public Domain )

Controversial Problem

The cultural and religious solution to this controversial problem is to tiptoe around these troublesome archaeological findings, and pretend that they do not exist. However, a logical alternative is that we are either looking in the wrong era or the wrong location for the United Monarchy, and so the solution to this perennial problem actually lies in Egypt. And while this may sound like a bizarre suggestion, it does actually make a great deal of sense.

Josephus Flavius, the first century Jewish historian, said that the ancient Israelites were the Hyksos pharaohs of Egypt, a story that I cover in some detail in my book Tempest & Exodus . So, originally the Israelites were an almost fully Egyptianized people, which is why they were joined on the Exodus by Apis-bull worshippers.

But what if some of these Hyksos-Israelite refugees did not go all the way to Jerusalem, or came back to Egypt in later generations? They would then be almost indistinguishable from the Egyptian 21st dynasty, which was likewise founded by immigrants.

The Third Intermediate Period of the 21st and 22nd dynasties is said to have been ruled by Meshwesh immigrants from Libya. And yet these immigrant Meshwesh were remarkably Egyptianized in both culture and religion, almost as if they had previously been exiled from Egypt. And so the possibility exists that there has been a slight confusion here. The Meshwesh and the Israelites are the same people—previous exiles from Egypt—and they did not establish their primary capital city at Zion (Jerusalem), but instead they built it at Zoan (Tanis) in the Nile Delta.

Fig 1. One of the temples at Tanis, in the Nile Delta. Was this the original Temple of Solomon?

Fig 1. One of the temples at Tanis, in the Nile Delta. Was this the original Temple of Solomon? (Photo R Ellis.)

Biblical Kings and Historical Pharaohs

But if the Israelites were the Meshwesh, then the biblical history of the United Monarchy should be directly comparable to the equivalent history of the 21st and 22nd dynasties of Egypt, whose pharaohs ruled at the same time as the biblical kings. This has been deemed impossible and unthinkable, which is why it has been dismissed out of hand and never investigated. However, since I don't mind going out on a limb, I compared these 'two' royal dynasties, and was surprised to find a great number of similarities between them. For instance, the following table compares the pharaohs of the twenty-first dynasty with the equivalent ancestors of King David:                             

Biblical leaders

Historical pharaohs

Ezron (Hezron)   

Ramesses

Ram      

Ramesses

Amminadab  

Amen-Nesbanebdjed (Smendes)

Nahshon        

Nemneshu  (Amenem-neshu)

Salmon 

Siamun

Boaz   

Bas-Uasorkon

Obed      

Amenem-Opet

David

Psusennes II     

This list clearly demonstrates that there are some equivalent-sounding names in both the historical record of Egypt and the biblical chronology of the United Monarchy – indeed the two royal lines appear to mimic each other remarkably well. But then we hit a problem, because the pharaonic king-list ends up with a pharaoh called Psusennes, whereas the biblical chronology results in King David. However, while these names may look very different, there are close similarities between these 'two' monarchs.

For instance, King David is known even to this day for his ‘Star of David’ and ‘City of David’. And as it happens, Psusennes was called Pa-seba-kha-en-nuit, which means 'My Star Rises Over (my) City'. In which case, both Pharaoh Psusennes and King David were closely associated with a star and a city. And in the book I go one to show that Psusennes was also called Duad, the biblical King Duad (King David in English).

Fig 2. Cartouche of Paseba-khaen-nuit (Psusennes) - the biblical King David.

Fig 2. Cartouche of Paseba-khaen-nuit (Psusennes) - the biblical King David.

The star means 'star' while the transverse cross means 'city'.

Fig 3. The magnificent solid silver sarcophagus of Psusennes or King David, which is almost unique in Egypt, and demonstrates the great wealth and influence of this dynasty.

Fig 3. The magnificent solid silver sarcophagus of Psusennes or King David, which is almost unique in Egypt, and demonstrates the great wealth and influence of this dynasty. (Photo R Ellis.)

In which case, there are many similarities between the United Monarchy and the 21st dynasty. But if these truly were the same royal dynasty, then everything between them should be the same, and strangely enough that is more or less what we find.

Surprising as it may seem, King David had a daughter who was called Maakhah Tamar rmt hkem, while Pharaoh Psusennes had a daughter who was known as Maakhare Mu-Tamhat. And the only appreciable difference between the names of these two royal princesses, is that the Judaean lady has dropped the ‘Mu’ from her second name or title.

Fig 4. The name of Maakhare mu-Tamhat - the biblical Maakhah Tamar.

Fig 4. The name of Maakhare mu-Tamhat - the biblical Maakhah Tamar.

But these similarities do not end with a king and his daughter, they extend much further. And so as we look deeper into the history of Pharaoh Psusennes, even more connections can be seen.

Biblical name           

Egyptian name                  

Rank or position

Maakhah Tamar

Maakhare Mu-Tamhat

A daughter of the king

Joab        

Un-Joab-Endjed 

An army commander of the king

Hiram Abi(f)         

Herum Atif                        

A chief architect of the king

Contrary to popular perceptions, we see here conclusive links and similarities between the supposedly distinct and separate monarchies of Egypt and Israel during the 10th century BC. And do remember that these two monarchies existed at exactly the same time, as the Tanakh itself makes perfectly clear. If the truth were known and its implications understood, the Israelite United Monarchy and the Egyptian 21st dynasty were one and the same. The story of the Tanakh is, in fact, the history of the new Lower Egyptian pharaonic line.

This discovery is interesting on so many levels, but one thing it can do is point us towards the true location of King Solomon's mines. Now we know that King Solomon was a member of the 21st or 22nd dynasties, then these famous mines must have belonged to the Tanis pharaohs. So where were the gold mines of the Tanis pharaohs? Actually, rather than being in Ethiopia or Southern Africa, they were located in Upper Egypt, and we shall discover their surprising location in Part II of this article.

(Read Part II )

Ralph Ellis, December 2002 © All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced by any means or in any form whatsoever without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher.

Extracted from:  Solomon, Pharaoh of Egypt by Ralph Ellis

Ebooks available on iPad, Kindle, Kobo or Nook.

Paperbacks from Amazon or Adventures Unlimited.

Featured image: The Visit of the Queen of Sheba to King Solomon ( Public Domain )

By Ralph Ellis

Comments

The Ship is also called Shining Beauty and Kabaa in the islam religion and is origine of the triangolo symbols and hats of the jews and the illuminati and the All Seeing Eye and it was reason the Piramids of Gizeh were built and pointed toward Orion.

"WOULD BECOME Some like this:

12 Then I saw Him open the sixth seal.(handling a controlpanel of course) A violent earthquake occurred; 14 the sky separated like a scroll being rolled up; and every mountain and island was moved from its place. 13 the stars of heaven fell to the earth as a fig tree drops its unripe figs when shaken by a high wind; 12 the entire moon became like blood; the sun turned black like sackcloth made of goat hair;

This Makes More Sense in order of Consequense of the start of a FTL Ship until lightspeed as fenomena of a launch and extreme accelerating speed and reaching Lightspeed. Even Motor Cyclists already have the experience of hypnotic scrolling Sky when they are speeding

NOV 8, 2014, 5:37 AM

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/10/the-500-year-old-map-that-s...

There was an Israel where now at the turkish Van legue the City Van is 8000 years ago. The Exodus of Israel went into outer Space and that´s why there stil can be Lithium6 Found at Northern Syria Raqqa and on and around Ararat because of two Polonium Hydrogen explosions to stall the coming armies of farao Imhotep and to wipe out any evidence of hightech presence at Ararat where by the top went from 6,5 kilometer high to present hight.

The Arc was a pendle at level of the culture of that time to prevent shock that pendled between Israel and the Spaceship called Throne of God Morninglight City in the Sky and Sea of Glass in the several religieus works of Mankind and harbored high at Ararat as Beacon for the Refugees A Tetrahydron Battleship with sides of 1000 meters existing completely out of Diamond and brought the Kaukasian White NONE jew Israeli to a Destination far beyond Orion and Betelgeuse to Have a New Life. It stil is in Orbit around the Sun .. Waiting .. what Destiny Mankind shall Choose.

There Never was a moses and an exodus by him. the Story was simply stolen to infiltrate Europe and steal Noah´s Identity. As they also stole Mohammed´s and Christ´s Identities and works for evil and submission into slavery.

Ista-Devi Istar...the goddess that played her harp for a blinded giant to soothe him...sound familiar?

With a "star" as her symbol...seems there is good reason nk trace of "Solomon or David" are found: "Solomon" is Shalmanu...Amenhotep III...the guy with a royal title of "Garude."

Again: there was no "Israel." The grossly misinterpreted Merneptah stele proves it. Merneptah has a royal title of "Jaashefit." The "king of Israel" when Merneptah allegedly "laid waste to Israel and it's seed is no more" was Jehosephat. The "king of Israel" that laid to Jezreel (Yezreel) the "city of seeds." Case closed. "Moses" was a title: "mes" meaning Smithie...and the biblical "Moses" story is comprised of all 22 kings of Egypt so titled. However...the one most closely associated to "Moses" in modern times is Tushratta...Seti I. The younger brother of the man he called "Nebukhudurriya" which is Akhenaton as Nebuchadrezzer...there was only one. Seti I was aka A-sty-ages..."biting serpent." "The indictment of Madduwatta" proves who "David" really was. And "the queen of Sheba" is the statue of Ista-Devi that Tushratta sent to Amenhotep III with 300 priestess of Istar....she is the queen of "TaeSub"...king Sheba: Shiva. Case closed.

Pages

Next article