In the dark rock shelter of Riparo Tagliente in Italy's Lessini Mountains, the fragmentary skeleton of a young man, interred more than 17,000 years ago, provides a chilling window (and reminder) into Stone Age violence. Long regarded as a mysterious burial of the Late Epigravettian age, the individual identified as Tagliente 1 has emerged from prehistory not as a peacefully laid-to-rest hunter, but as a victim of a calculated, lethal assault.
He was struck by flint-pointed projectiles in what appears to have been an ambush. New research, published in Scientific Reports, uses advanced microscopy and 3D imaging to reevaluate incised marks found on the femur and tibia of Tagliente 1.
These gouges, once casually attributed to post-mortem breakage or even ritualistic defleshing, are in fact, conclusively identified as Projectile Impact Marks (PIMs), inflicted by high-velocity flint weapons in a deadly encounter.
A Hidden History of Paleolithic Conflict
Evidence of violence among Paleolithic peoples is rare, often hidden by millennia of taphonomic damage or incomplete burials. But in this case, modern technology has peeled back the layers of time. Tagliente 1 may now represent one of the earliest known victims of violence using complex projectile technology.
The three projectile impact marks on Tagliente 1's left femur. (Figure reproduced from: Sparacello VS et al. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94095-x/CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
- Debate continues over whether Stone Age people were peaceful or warlike
- Truth of 7300-Year-Old Violence Uncovered in the Spanish Pyrenees
Analysis of the bones reveals that this man, aged between 22 and 30, suffered at least two direct hits: one to the front of the thigh, and another to the back of the lower leg. These wounds are steep, sharply defined, and in some areas, flaked along the edges—hallmarks of high-energy impact from flint-tipped weapons.
Microscopic striations within the grooves further confirm that these were not cuts from tools, but injuries from fast-flying projectiles. The absence of any signs of healing suggests the blows were fatal and rapidly so, likely due to hemorrhaging from a severed femoral artery.
"It's very, very possible that this was a rapid death, because once your femoral artery is pierced, you have basically a few minutes before it's too late," Vitale Sparacello told Live Science. Sparacello is a bioarchaeologist at the University of Cagliari in Italy and a co-author of the new study.
The directionality of the wounds implies dynamic movement. The frontal femur injury suggests an initial head-on strike, while the tibial wound points to a second hit from behind. Was the victim running? Turning to flee? The evidence leaves room for interpretation but hints at a chase, or a sudden ambush—perhaps involving more than one attacker.
The Emergence of Territorial Violence
Who killed Tagliente 1, and under what circumstances, may never be definitively known. Yet the broader environmental and archaeological context invites plausible theories. Around 17,000 years ago, Europe was thawing after the Last Glacial Maximum. As ice sheets retreated, new ecological niches opened in the Alpine valleys, attracting human groups in search of fresh resources and hunting grounds.
The location and site of Riparo Tagliente in Italy, and the skeletal remains of Tagliente 1. (Figure reproduced from: Sparacello VS., et al. 2025. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94095-x/CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
The Riparo Tagliente shelter, nestled in the southern Alps, marks one of the earliest known reoccupations of the region. The people who dwelled there were seasonal nomads, adept at navigating highland prairies and valley-bottoms, exploiting ibex, deer, and freshwater sources. But these territories, once sealed in ice, were now contested. With opportunity came crowding—and conflict.
Projectile weapons in this context take on particular significance. Ethnographic comparisons suggest that in small-scale, mobile societies, thrown or launched weapons were not typically used in personal disputes. Instead, they signified planned acts of intergroup aggression: ambushes, raids, or skirmishes designed to strike from a distance. The wounds of Tagliente 1, inflicted by such arms, signal not a brawl among acquaintances, but perhaps a brush with war.
Honoring the Dead, Remembering the Violence
Despite the violent nature of his end, Tagliente 1 was buried with care. His body was laid supine in a shallow pit, arms outstretched. His legs were covered with slabs of stone—one engraved with the image of a lion and the horn of an aurochs. Nearby, ochre-stained pebbles and a possible pierced shell suggest ritual gestures.
- Stone Age people were eating porridge 32,000 years ago
- New study finds ancient humans butchered elephants with stone tools 500,000 years ago
This contrast between brutal death and respectful burial raises profound questions. Was he honored for bravery? Mourned as a victim of treachery? Commemorated as a symbol of loss or warning?
Some archaeologists suggest that such burials may have served as ritual responses to “bad deaths”—violent, untimely, or otherwise unsettling demises that disrupted the social order. In this interpretation, Tagliente 1’s burial was an act of reparation to ritually contain the chaos that his death represented.
Top image: Illustration of intergroup Stone Age violence and conflict. Source: Shanxi Provincial Museum Taiyuan/Public domain
By Sahir
References
Berdugo, S. 2025. 'It was probably some kind of an ambush': 17,000 years ago, a man died in a projectile weapon attack in what is now Italy. Available at: https://www.livescience.com/archaeology/it-was-probably-some-kind-of-an-ambush-17-000-years-ago-a-man-died-in-a-projectile-weapon-attack-in-what-is-now-italy.
Sparacello, V.S., Thun Hohenstein, U., Boschin, F. et al. 2025. Projectile weapon injuries in the Riparo Tagliente burial (Veneto, Italy) provide early evidence of Late Upper Paleolithic intergroup conflict. Scientific Reports, 15(14857). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94095-x.
