All  
New Research Shows that Some Ancient Egyptians Were Naturally Fair-Haired

New Research Shows that Some Ancient Egyptians Were Naturally Fair-Haired

Print

According to Dr. Janet Davey from the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine in Australia, some ancient Egyptians were naturally blonde or red haired. Her research has brought an answer to an intriguing question connected with Egyptian mummies and the effects of the mummification process.

An article published recently by The Sydney Morning Herald says that the mystery of the red and blonde hair discovered on some ancient Egyptian mummies may finally be solved. The new research was necessary to check the common perception that no ancient Egyptians had hair that wasn’t colored dark brown or black. Until now, most researchers had claimed that the different colors of the mummy hair were a result of the mummification process itself.

Dr. Davey decided to do innovative experiments, which she accomplished with the support of her friend, a retired industrial chemist named Alan Elliot. They prepared a quantity of synthetic natron, and used it on 16 hair samples. Natron was a kind of a salt that was used during the process of mummification to dry out the remains and has often been linked to a supposed hair color “change.”

The mummies of Yuya and Tuya. Both have light hair color.

The mummies of Yuya and Tuya. Both have light hair color. ( Youtube Screenshot )

Davey and Elliot covered samples in the salty powder for 40 days. It is believed that this was the same amount of time that was needed in ancient times to dry out the bodies. The donors of the hair were men and women aged from 4 to 92 years old. Most of the samples were dark hair, with one grey, one fair, and one with henna on it for comparison.

After 40 days, all the hair was removed from the salty powder and they appeared unchanged. Microscopic analysis also showed no change in the hair.

Dr. Davey is convinced that there were fair-haired Egyptians, but believes that the fair-haired mummies are just very rare. This is why Egyptologists used to believe that lighter hair color was created during the mummification process. Moreover, Davey suggests that there were blondes living in Egypt during the Graeco-Roman Period (332 BC – 395 AD).

"Some ancient Egyptians could have been blue-eyed blondes or brown-eyed blondes. I wouldn't say ancient Egypt was multi-cultural like Australia today but certainly there were various mixes." - she said.

Mummy of 19th dynasty King Rameses II. Note the fair hair color.

Mummy of 19th dynasty King Rameses II. Note the fair hair color. ( CC BY SA 3.0 )

The secret of mummies with differently colored hair is as old as the Egyptian civilization itself. For example, the oldest known mummy with dyed hair is dated back to 3400 BC. It was the Late Pre-dynastic period of Egypt, a very mysterious time in the history of the country.

The well-preserved mummy of a man was excavated by Wallis Budge in the end of the 19th century. Nowadays, it is exhibited in the British Museum. The mummy was nicknamed '' The Ginger '', due to the color of its hair. The man was mummified naturally, without the use of natron. He was buried at the desert necropolis in Gebelein, Egypt. The mummy of “The Ginger” sheds light on the very early history of Egypt, and suggests that people who created the Egyptian civilizations could have been blonde or red haired too.

Detail of “The Ginger” mummy.

Detail of “The Ginger” mummy. ( The British Museum )

Moreover, one of the greatest pharaohs in history, Ramesses II, had red hair . For many decades, researchers believed that his color was caused by natron applied to the mummy. Another theory said that fair hair in Egyptian mummies was a result of marriages with women from Anatolia. The Hittite prince Zannanza, who was sent from Hattusha to Thebes to marry princess Ankhesenamun, had light skin and hair. The father of the powerful queen Tiye (wife of Amenhotep III), Yuya was blonde as well.

On December 14, 2014 Ancient Origins reported on a remarkable discovery in Fag el-Gamous necropolis, which lies along the eastern edge of the Fayum depression near Seila in Egypt and dates to the time when the Roman or Byzantine Empire controlled Egypt, from the 1st to the 7th century AD.

It is an enormous cemetery that is believed to contain over one million burials of ordinary Egyptian citizens that were naturally mummified by the hot and dry desert sands over 1,500 years ago. Over three decades of excavations by Brigham Young University in Utah revealed some incredible finds, such as the remains of large male over 7 feet (2.13 meters) tall, an infant child that was discovered wearing a tunic and jewelry, and unique groupings of burials clustered according to hair color, including blond and redheaded mummies.

Redheaded female found at Fag el-Gamous.

Redheaded female found at Fag el-Gamous. ( Brigham Young University )

Featured Image: Anubis, supervisor of the mummification process. ( CC BY SA 2.0 ) A mummified blonde boy, about five years of age. ( British Museum )

By Natalia Klimczak

Comments

"DNA proof does not clasifiy races of people, instead, it only tells us where people were isolated in groups for long periods of time..."

THEN you SAY....

"It is also a fact that southern Europeans have as much as 24% African DNA, probably because southern Europe is CLOSER to AFRICA than it is to northern Europe which is far away.. There are two land bridges (Enclaves) that lead out of Africa straight from Morocco and into Spain where the BLACKAMOORS ruled for 800+ years."

You say DNA doesn't classify race, then do a 180 to try to equate African DNA with Black Moors. What a load of tosh. Your whole post is just nonsense right up to blonde hair and blue eyes in melanesians. It falls apart. Blonde hair and blue eyes is a rarity among black people. This wouldn't be a debate if blonde or red hair was common among black people as you seem to imply.

Even though Europeans live across the mediterranean Sea, it is also true that Africans also live across the mediterranean sea, YET, African building structures were TOTALLY different from those in Europe and Asia.   It is true that ancient Africa which includes NUBIA, EGYPT, ETHIOPIA, PUNT etc were indeed 100% purely Black African peoples culture and technology..  There are Black African people who also have light hair, as well as many different skin colors.   Also, DNA proof does not clasifiy races of people, instead, it only tells us where people were isolated in groups for long periods of time, and that even people of the same race can have extremely didderent DNA when they are segegated farther distances by thousands of miles, such as the BLACK Melanesian, Aussie aborigines, Black Philippine Ates, Black Thai Mani’s.   It is a fact that DNA differences does not change the NEGROID race of these people just because of DNA differences.   The closer the proximity of groups of different people, the LESS DIFFERENCE one can observe in their DNA...It is also a fact that southern Europeans have as much as 24% African DNA, probably because southern Europe is CLOSER to AFRICA than it is to northern Europe which is far away..  There are two land bridges (Enclaves) that lead out of Africa straight from Morocco and into Spain where the BLACKAMOORS ruled for 800+ years.   There were southern Italian immigrants from southern Italy who were classified as Black Race in the southern USA during Post Civil War Reconstruction between 1880 – 1930, and were forbidden from marrying with white Anglo pale color skin people..There are also blond haired Black Melanesian people with blue eyes who are definitely 100% Black Melanesian race and has -0- zero % European DNA…..keep the record straight…..

Charles Bowles

Europeans literally live across the Mediterranean Sea for Heaven's sake. The Near and Middle East is right next door to Egypt. Why people want to keep insisting that only black people populated and ran the country is ridiculous. Even with DNA proof, people want to further that false narrative.

DNA testing has been conducted ( more than a few times now, always same result ) on Tut, and others, by a Swiss genealogy company named IGENEA concluding that they belonged to an ancestral line, or haplogroup, called R1b1a2, that is rare in modern Egypt but common in western Europeans. This is the reality and the non reality babble is based and fueled by political correctness and the widespread anti White sentiment so popular now. The current ridiculous fable being spread, viciously by the modern Egyptians, and academia, this Egypt was then populated by the same ethnic group that populates Egypt now. Those this people didn't show up until much much later. Truth and reality is the Kryptonite to modern academia and status quo.

It would be very easy to trust in these findings, if they had genetic proof. In the light thrown with these findings, it is still fairly uncertain. Well, those samples only need to be buried in a desert location for 2000+ years, then we can be more certain of the matter. I think the genetic analysis could be a bit faster to produce, if decent DNA samples can be obtained from the mummys in question.

Pages

Next article