All  
Human Evolutionary Theory Needs Updating, Again

Human Evolutionary Theory Needs Updating, Again

Print

Until now the Middle Stone Age is thought to have ended about 30,000 years ago. However, new evidence unearthed in Africa suggests the tools which define this period of African prehistory between the Early Stone Age and the Later Stone Age - continued to be produced for another 20,000 years.

Recent archaeological digs in Africa found evidence of Middle Stone Age tools dating to just 11,000 years ago, about 20,000 years after these tools were traditionally believed to have stopped being produced. This means groups of ancient humans moved to using newer tools at different speeds, and that early human hunters lived in relative isolation from each other.

Questioning Human Evolution in the Middle Stone Age

All previous archaeological and anthropological discoveries in Africa have supported the belief that humans in Africa stopped using simple points and scraper tools and developed more complex weapons , tools and craft appliances about 30,000 years ago. However, researchers from Germany’s Max Planck Institute have published their new findings in the journal  Scientific Reports claiming the latest evidence gathered at sites in Senegal, on the West coast of Africa, are “fueling a rethink of the passage of human evolution.”

 

 

The new paper suggests some ancient people living in Africa 11,000 years ago were still using simple tools, while other groups had developed more advanced technologies 20,000 years previously. This directly challenges the traditional theory that humans evolved in a linear fashion, making technological advances together, and proves humans evolved at greatly different rates around Africa, and the world.

Team fieldwalking along the Gambia River, Senegal. (Eleanor Scerri / Max-Plank Institute)

Team fieldwalking along the Gambia River, Senegal. (Eleanor Scerri / Max-Plank Institute )

Evolution In A Nutshell

Putting recent human evolutionary history in a nutshell: the period before Homo sapiens is known as the Lower Stone age, and that gave way to the Middle Stone Age, where we began developing simple stone, wood and rope tools. In the Late Stone Age, the skill sets that were developed using these tools became craft disciplines, and the rapid advancements in technologies started at that time haven’t stopped since, leading to our current state, as tool wielding monkeys with big aspirations. Note: I said that last bit, not the researchers at the Max Planck Institute .

The archaeologists wrote that for most of humanity's prehistory groups of humans were relatively isolated from each other. This conclusion was derived from the fact that most Middle Stone Age finds in Africa date to between 300 thousand and 30 thousand years ago and after this time they largely vanish. However, the new finds show primitive tool production continued in some isolated areas much later in the Late Stone Age, “when the Neolithic became the Bronze age around 3,500 BC,” said the researchers.

The lead author of the new study, Dr Eleanor Scerri, said that up to now almost everything that is known about ancient human origins has been extrapolated from discoveries in small parts of eastern and southern Africa. Now, this new work highlights the importance of investigating the entirety of the African continent so to construct a clearer and more reality-based picture of human evolution.

Lithics from Laminia (A-D) and Saxomununya (E-H). (A) unretouched flake; (B) bifacially retouched flake; (C) Levallois core evidencing a step fracture; (D) side retouched flake/scraper; (E, F) Levallois cores; (G) bifacial foliate point; (H) bifacial foliate. (Jacopo Cerasoni / Nature CC-BY-4.0)

Lithics from Laminia (A-D) and Saxomununya (E-H). (A) unretouched flake; (B) bifacially retouched flake; (C) Levallois core evidencing a step fracture; (D) side retouched flake/scraper; (E, F) Levallois cores; (G) bifacial foliate point; (H) bifacial foliate. (Jacopo Cerasoni / Nature CC-BY-4.0)

The Hindering Effects Of Geographic Isolation

The team are currently unclear as to “why” some groups of West Africa's Stone Age hunters were left standing in time while others rapidly advanced. However, they think “geographical isolation” has a lot to do with it. And we can still see the effects of geographical isolation in the modern world, for example, we have 20 years olds in San Fransisco walking about with Google Glasses being fed big data in live streams, while other 20 year olds around Yaohnanen village on the southern island of Tanna in Vanuatu worship Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, the consort to Queen Elizabeth II, as a divine being.

The researchers also suggests that perhaps the people with less advanced technologies experience fewer changes in climate, therefore, they were not under such intense pressure to survive and adapt. Either way, the study presents “a newer view of human evolution:” one in which groups of Stone Age survivalists lived and developed separately, and maybe even had “cultural boundaries,” living “in slightly different ecological niches,” wrote the researchers.

Top image: Freshly found artifact of the Middle Stone Age from Laminia, Senegal.  Source: Eleanor Scerri / Max-Plank Institute

By Ashley Cowie

Comments

Paul Davies's picture

Maybe you should all read Michael Denton’s 1991 book “Evolution: A Theory in Crisis”. He has since written two follow-ups. Basically, he says that from what we DO know and CAN prove, Evolution CANNOT happen. Biochemistry has known this since the early 90s, though the mainstream won’t even discuss. In probability terms, you are more likely to win first-prize Lotto every week for a decade from a single ticket withour losing once than for a single species to randomly evolve into a cloely-related one. Also, the fossil record is still devoid of “links” – NONE of the claims stand up to serious analyses.

And then you have the dating problems. Radiometirc dating methods all have the same flaw – the ASSUMPTIONs made in order to be able to apply the process. They are not themselves scientific, being unrepeatable (the sample is destroyed in the test), and unreliable (the few times a particular artifact has been repeatedly dated [different samples each time of course], there has been NO CORRELATION between the results. There are LIMITING FACTORS on the age of the earth that are not often discussed which limit the actual potential age to less than 20 thousand years absolute maximum. 

What about the half-life of DNA (10,000 years)? So Dinosaur bones CANNOT be millions of years old if viable DNA is being recovered. How about the flow-rates of rocks (again, doesn’t allow for millions of years)?

And all the animal species alive today who bear fetures that CANNOT be explained by ANY current evolutionary mechanism – The giraffe (valves in its neck ARTERIES), the woodpecker (tongue too long for its head) and the Bombadier beetle (chemical reaction fire chamber plus glands, etc).

For a community that prides itself on asking awkward questions, these are some of the most fundamental.

My daughter is currently doing third-year archaeology. The anthropology papers she has had to review for essays are APPALLING, in their lack of evidence. They are little more than academic SciFi, extrapolating fanciful ideas as though they were based on facts.

Please at least read Denton’s book. The BEST critique’s I’ve seen so far are basically “well we know he has to be wrong”, which smacks more of religion than science.

Crasslee's picture

I don't think you understand what science is. The whole concept is to continuously test and retest hypothesises, until you come to one that can stand unchallenged. That is then a theory. i.e. The Theory of evolution. But it is always up for correction, as long as you, and others can prove your theory through peer review. So yes, they do prove each other wrong from time to time. But I disagree that they want YOU to think they're always right. Maybe if you studied science a bit, you'd understand what's actually going on.

Crasslee

One thing about scientists- they want you to think they're always right, but they continuously prove each other WRONG.

Next article