All  
"The Last Days of Tenochtitlan, Conquest of Mexico by Cortez", a 19th-century painting by William de Leftwich Dodge.

Genes of 92 prehistoric Native Americans give further evidence of a terrible holocaust

Print

The genocide of Native Americans is considered by many to be the worst of any in history—outstripping the later Jewish and Roma Holocaust by as much as an order of magnitude. Now a study of the maternal genes of skeletal and mummified remains of 92 North and South Americans dating from 8,600 to 500 years ago shows that all those lineages were wiped out. No living person descended from any the individuals tested is known to be living today.

It is unknown how many people lived in the Americas when Columbus and the other conquistadors arrived. Estimates range from 1 million to 100 million. One middling estimate puts the North American number alone at about 12 million people, who were reduced to 237,000 by 1900.

Of the 84 genetic lineages among the 92 North and South American remains, not one lineage survived contact with Europeans, a new study says.

“When Europeans arrived, some of those populations were wiped out completely,” Bastien Llamas, an author of the study who is a geneticist with the University of Adelaide, told Science.

DeSoto claiming the Mississippi, as depicted in the United States Capitol rotunda

DeSoto claiming the Mississippi, as depicted in the United States Capitol rotunda (public domain)

Mitochondrial DNA provides only part of the picture, the article states—the line of mother to child. You don’t see if male genes survived, or even what happened with women who didn’t have children. (Though if they didn’t have children obviously their genes would not survive in present-day people.)

The Science article tells how the study was conducted. The researchers took DNA from the 92 skeletons and mummies from western North and South America, from Mexico to Chile. The team sequenced the mitochondrial genome of each person’s remains. Mitochondrial genes descend from mother to child, “so the sequences open a window onto the matrilineal heritage of indigenous Americans extending all the way back to their roots in Siberia,” the article states.

Natives reject the idea that all of their ancestors arrived from Siberia, so this study has an element of controversy. The article states:

By tallying up the random mutations that accumulate in populations that have been separated, geneticists can count backwards and figure out when two groups last had a common ancestor. When the researchers applied that technique to the 92 mummies and skeletons, they found that their ancestors had last been in contact with Siberian populations about 23,000 years ago. After that, a group with about 2000 child-bearing females (perhaps about 10,000 people total) spent 6000 years or so genetically cut off from other groups of humans. That supports the idea that the ancestors of the earliest Americans spent a few millennia stranded in Beringia, the now submerged landmass that once stretched from Siberia to Alaska, before the ice sheets started to melt and open up passages to the New World.

Map showing the location of Bering Land Bridge National Preserve

Map showing the location of Bering Land Bridge National Preserve (public domain)

About 16,000 years ago there was a population boom. Suddenly, lineages began branching off, a time when, the researchers believe, people began to move from Beringia, which is now submerged, into the Americas. There, with new land and untapped resources, the population spread rapidly to every corner of the New World.

Alan Cooper, an evolutionary biologist who was a lead author of the study, said the only possible route was along the Pacific coast because the ice sheets were so thick and there was no way through farther inland.

“Everybody settled down,” the article states. “Within a few thousand years, many of the ancient lineages had already diverged from one another, meaning that people from one group were not having babies with people from another (or at least, their mothers weren’t moving around, since we’re talking about mitochondrial DNA). The team found 84 separate genetic lineages represented by the 92 samples, they report today in Science Advances.”

So how did all those unfortunate people die? This is another area of controversy among natives of North and South America and the Caribbean. While some say most natives were accidentally wiped out by disease, the fact is, beginning with Columbus in the Caribbean, Cortez in Mexico and Pizarro in Peru, Europeans killed and enslaved natives. And it was no different in later years. Some natives died from being worked to death. Others starved. History books are filled with one attack on and slaughter of innocent native villagers after another. And yes, many died from disease.

16th century Aztec drawing of smallpox victims

16th century Aztec drawing of smallpox victims (public domain)

This writer has often thought that if the Europeans knew they were infecting and killing natives with disease, the only decent thing they could have done would have been to quarantine themselves from these continents. But if you look at American Founding Fathers’ statements and texts, they had a deliberate policy to “remove” Indians, steal their territory and kill them off.

The first U.S. president, George Washington, stated in 1779:

The immediate objectives are the total destruction and devastation of their settlements and the capture of as many prisoners of every age and sex as possible. It will be essential to ruin their crops in the ground and prevent their planting more.

Featured image: "The Last Days of Tenochtitlan, Conquest of Mexico by Cortez", a 19th-century painting by William de Leftwich Dodge. (public domain)

By Mark Miller

Comments

geizerman's picture

if during world war 2, with modern means, tools and weapons, the nazis couldnt wipe out the jewish or roma or gay or mentally deficient from europe, what makes you think they could do it to a whole continent of native americans (north and south) with muzzle loading flintlocks?? 

 

Regarding the Pleistocene extinctions, I read somewhere that all of the present bison population of North America was descended from a single female just a few thousand years ago.

One important factor not mentioned in the various comments: These were remains of Native Americans ranging from 26,000 years ago to 500 years ago. In other words, a substantial number of them dated from the Pleistocene epoch. There was a mass extinction at the end of the Pleistocene which affected both humans and animals, almost certainly caused by some form of comet impact. This being the case, it is hardly surprising that Native Americans of the Clovis period (Pleistocene) left no descendants. Native Europeans of the same epoch, I can guarantee, left just as few.

Although I realize that you are saying something I’m really not sure what you are trying to say, or the point if any you are attempting to make.

It would be interesting to know just how “quite extensively” you have looked into this. Who’s and what where your sources of information that enables you to state that the “numbers just don’t add up”.

Over the duration that the the Nazi’s came into power and throughout their control they became very good at hiding things from the general public as to what was going on. Also as their world was collapsing around them they where actively destroying any and all documents that they could in an attempt to hide what had happened.

Also keep in mind that it was not only those of the Jewish faith that where being rounded up and placed in camps to be exterminated. Many individuals from all walks and levels of the population where also being subjected to what was going on.
People where being rounded up and sent to these concentration camps to either be exterminated or worked to death in the various work camps to construct fortifications etc . Many where sent to slave factories where they where worked to death. They had mobile gas chambers that drove around with people being gassed in the back of the van/truck then the bodies where disposed of. Countless where murdered during medical experiments. The list goes on and on and on and on.

Does it really matter about any figure. Be it 1, 10, 100, 1,000, 1,000,000,000, 2,000,000, 3,000,000, 4,000,000, 5,000,000, 6,000,000 or more . The mere fact that there where any murdered in such a manner for the Nazi cause speaks for itself.

Further, it was not just members of the Nazi party committing these things. There where many others who contributed and collaberated, directly and indirectly.

Might I suggest watching the following. A program produced by the BBC called I believe Nazi; A Warning from History. Then watch the movie called Conspiracy Theory.

Also I might suggest you read a book that was published 2-3 years ago called 'Operation Paperclip'. Although this book does not deal with want had happened in Europe during the Nazi control, it is still a good read.

I have looked into this quite extensively and the numbers just don't add up, and while there was thousands or even hundreds of thousands of jews killed there is no real evidence for 6 million being wiped out, the pictures of the skulls are terrible and are a testimony to mans complete disregard for life but they could have been any race and the pictures of emaciated prisoners are the same but let me put a bit of context on them, In the last six or eight months of the war there was no way of getting food or any other supplies to those camps so how do you think you would look after six or eight months of emergency rations? and something else for you to think about the number "6 million" has been thrown around several times in jewish history go and look it up

Pages

Next article