All  
The Army of Saladin, Guillaume de TyrParis, 1337. Source: Public domain

Battlefield Where Richard the Lionheart Defeated Saladin Located

Print

An Israeli archaeologist has identified the long-lost battlefield of Arsuf. This was a battle that took place during the Crusades between the legendary figures of Richard the Lionheart and Saladin. The battle of Arsuf (1191 AD) was one of the most important to take place during the Crusades , but its exact location had been lost for centuries.

Dr. Rafael Lewis, during his post-doctoral studies at the University of Tel Aviv, began work on identifying the site of the Battle of Arsuf. According to the Jerusalem Post , the “memory of its exact location had been long lost.” The battle between Muslims and Western European Christians was long believed to have occurred on the Plains of Sharon, near the busy modern city of Tel Aviv. Haaretz reports that it “was known to have taken place near the ancient settlement of Apollonia, aka Arsuf, whose remains today lie on the Israeli coast just north of Tel Aviv.” However, no-one knew where the battle took place despite its immense historic importance.

The archaeologist examined primary sources and discovered that Richard the Lionheart and his army made their way down the coast from Arce. In the image Saladin’s armies can be seen during the Siege of Arce. (Public domain)

The archaeologist examined primary sources and discovered that Richard the Lionheart and his army made their way down the coast from Arce. In the image Saladin’s armies can be seen during the Siege of Arce. ( Public domain )

Challenges of Battlefield Archaeology

Pinpointing the site of the battle was challenging. Dr. Lewis told the Jerusalem Post that “the area of battlefield archaeology focuses on events that last only a few hours or at most a few days, whose sites are therefore challenging to be investigated archaeologically.” The archaeologist, who now works at Haifa University, decided to adopt an innovative approach to identify the long-lost battlefield.

First, he examined the primary sources from the period, such as medieval maps. He knew that Richard the Lionheart and his army of western European knights and soldiers made their way down the coast from Acre. He also studied the ancient network of roads, which are vastly different from those today.

Using environmental studies, Dr. Lewis found what he believes is the battlefield site where Muslims and Crusaders clashed. (Rafael (Rafi) Lewis)

Using environmental studies, Dr. Lewis found what he believes is the battlefield site where Muslims and Crusaders clashed. (Rafael (Rafi) Lewis)

Lewis told the Jerusalem Post that he employed environmental studies “which usually are not considered but provide a lot of information.” He was able to estimate the humidity and heat of the area in the 12 th century AD and the hours of sunlight and moonlight. He knew from documentary sources that the battle took place in September and this was helpful. The various data points and the sources led him to believe that the battle took place between the modern city of Herzliyya and modern Arsuf.

Dr. Lewis surveyed the proposed battlefield site with a metal detector and turned up arrowheads and other metal objects from the right era. (Rafael (Rafi) Lewis)

Dr. Lewis surveyed the proposed battlefield site with a metal detector and turned up arrowheads and other metal objects from the right era. (Rafael (Rafi) Lewis)

Metal Detector Helps Locate Battlefield

Lewis believed that there were also strategic reasons why the battle took place in this area. Richard the Lionheart had wanted the conquer Jerusalem and recapture its holy sites.  However, for strategic reasons, he headed for the port of Jaffa. The archaeologist told the Jerusalem Post that “Saladin did not believe that Richard was marching towards Jaffa but that at that point he and his troops were going to turn inland in the direction of Jerusalem.”  As a result, Lewis believes that the Muslim and the Christian armies encountered each other at the spot identified by him near Arsuf. In the 13 th century, the battlefield was an oak forest.

It was only in the latter stages of his research that Lewis conducted archaeological research. He surveyed the proposed battlefield site with a metal detector . The Times reports that the “preliminary scan of the site has so far turned up arrowheads and other metal objects of the right date.” These artifacts appear to substantiate Lewis’s theory concerning the battlefield site.

Amongst the artifacts found was a piece of a "violin-key" horseshoe that was used in Western Europe in the Crusader period. Rafael (Rafi) Lewis

Amongst the artifacts found was a piece of a "violin-key" horseshoe that was used in Western Europe in the Crusader period. Rafael (Rafi) Lewis

Crucial Battle of the Third Crusade

The Battle of Arsuf was the most important military confrontation of the Third Crusade . This was prompted by the defeat of the Crusader kingdom of Jerusalem at Hattin by the great Muslim hero Saladin. Later the forces of Saladin captured Jerusalem and the Crusader states in the Levant were on the point of collapse. The Third Crusade was called by the Pope to recapture Jerusalem.

Richard I of England, popularly known as the Lionheart, captured Acre from the Muslims in 1191. He desperately needed a port and made his way south to Jaffa. As the Crusaders were leaving a forest, they were ambushed by Saladin. Richard the Lionheart’s army withstood the attacks and the military order of Knights Hospitaller counterattacked the Muslims and caught them by surprise. The heavily armored Christians overwhelmed Saladin’s army and inflicted thousands of casualties.  

The Battle of Arsuf is famous as the encounter between Richard the Lionheart and Saladin. (Public domain)

The Battle of Arsuf is famous as the encounter between Richard the Lionheart and Saladin. ( Public domain )

Crusaders Failure to Capture Jerusalem

However, the Crusaders did not push on to crush the army of Saladin because they feared more ambushes. Lewis is quoted by the Jerusalem Post as saying that “Richard won the battle, but failed to destroy the Muslim forces.”  The Christians did not manage to capture Jerusalem which was their main objective. Many believe that the Battle of Arsuf ensured a Christian presence in the area for more than a century. The Jewish population of the region did not participate in the conflict between Christians and Muslims.

The potential identification of the site of the battle could be a breakthrough in our understanding of the Third Crusade. More research needs to be conducted in the area. In future, the methodology used in the study could help researchers to identify other lost battlefield sites.

Top image: The Army of Saladin, Guillaume de TyrParis, 1337. Source: Public domain

By Ed Whelan

Comments

Timeghost's picture

It would have been nice t o include a map of the area in which the battle is supposdd to have occurred. I don't always have time to go to another app to find things.

Timeghost

Pete Wagner's picture

All of history is a stretch of the imagination.  All we can be sure of is what we see today.  Human nature as we now see it (ugly or not) is the only strong truth-bearing pillar.

Nobody gets paid to tell the truth.

Hi Ed Whelan,

Great article Ed. It's exciting to know that the Battlefield fought upon by Saladin and Richard has been found.

I'll say about 6 years back the History Channel did over 4 hours regarding the History of the Crusades (all my history teachers tell me never trust the History Channel; but, they keep assigning text books that say the exact same thing that the History Channel devulges), both historian scholars an professor's on both sides pretty much agreed that the first two battles were the only significant decisive battles throughout the entire Crusades.

That the other battles that came after the first two battles over Jerusalem wasn't very.... um didn't make any real headway too me the last wars were more out of habit than anything else still so does this battle between Richard the Lion heart and Saladin the issue is that Richard won the battle but list the War?

The overconfidence of man at work. How come Christendom as Europe was known as in those days didn't consult Almighty God of this plan?

Majority of the People in Asia Minor are the ancestors of Shem and Abraham while all of Europe are the ancestors of Japheth his sons Magog and Javan.

My point God made a series of Covenants with Shem's children, especially with Abraham; Saladin, was probably a great-grandson of Abraham. I suppose that I'm wondering if the Covenant is the reason Saladin survived The Crusades an Europe at that time did not get Jerusalem.

Great article, Ed. This is big for history.

Next article