Members of the Mount Ararat and Noah’s Ark Research Team announced what they believe is a significant discovery at a site that was first named as a possible final resting place for Noah’s Ark decades ago, a find that suggests this mountainous area of modern-day Turkey did in fact experience a catastrophic flood several thousand years ago.
The researchers collected approximately 30 rock and soil samples from the vicinity of the Durupinar formation, a 538-foot (164-meter) geological structure with an ark-like shape that can be found approximately 19 miles (30 kilometers) south of the summit of Mount Ararat, near the Turkey-Iran border in the Doğubayazıt district of Ağrı. The samples were sent to Istanbul Technical University for analysis, and the findings confirmed that the area had once been underwater.
Testing revealed traces of clay-like materials, marine deposits, and remnants of sea life, including mollusks. These anomalous materials in a now-dry region were dated to between 1,500 and 3,000 BC, which aligns with the Chalcolithic period timeline that has been linked to the global flood described in Genesis (and referenced in other religious texts as well).
"Our studies show that this region harbored life in that period and that, at some point, it was covered by water, which reinforces the possibility that a catastrophic event of great magnitude occurred," the researchers said, in a statement published by the Jerusalem Post.
Noah’s Ark on Mount Ararat, painting by Simon de Myle, 1570. (Public Domain).
The researchers originally presented their findings at the 7th International Symposium on Mount Ararat and Noah's Ark, which was held in eastern Turkey in late 2023. The Mount Ararat and Noah’s Ark Research Team is composed of scientists from Istanbul Technical University and Agri Ibrahim Cecen University in Turkey and Andrews University in the United States, and they have been working since 2021 to collect evidence showing that the Durupinar formation might very well be the fossilized remains of Noah’s legendary ark. Their work continues at the site, as they are seeking more evidence to support their assertions about the ultimate fate of history’s most famous lifeboat.
- Is this the Final Resting Place of Noah? It is Certainly One of the Contenders
- Startling Similarity between Hindu Flood Legend of Manu and the Biblical Account of Noah
The Durupinar Formation: Two Interpretations
The Durupinar formation was discovered by a Kurdish farmer in 1948, and brought to international attention in 1951 by Turkish Army Captain Ilhan Durupinar during a NATO mapping mission.
Most geologists scoffed at the notion that this rock formation might be linked to the biblical account of Noah’s Ark. But for those who are convinced this account is 100-percent true, the discovery of a site with such a provocative shape and dimensions, located so close to Mount Arafat, couldn’t be so easily dismissed.
"And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat," is what it says in Genesis 8:4, and hence the significance of the site’s proximity to Ararat. Mount Ararat itself makes a poor candidate for the final resting spot of the ark, since its has an altitude of nearly 17,000 feet (5,137 meters) and is covered with snow at the top.
Mount Ararat, dominating the skyline as seen from the plains of eastern Turkey. (Vyacheslav Argenberg/CC BY-SA 4.0).
After years of excavations, the researchers believe they’ve found proof that human beings were active in the region surrounding the far more accessible Durupinar formation.
"According to the initial results, it's believed there were human activities in this region since the Chalcolithic period," said Prof. Dr. Faruk Kaya, Vice Rector of Agri Ibrahim Cecen University. "An essential outcome of the symposium was the decision to conduct more research in Cudi and Ararat, known as the Mesopotamian region.”
The Durupinar formation has long captivated researchers and explorers due to its curious ship-like shape and dimensions that appear to match the biblical description of Noah's Ark. In the Bible the Ark's dimensions were given as "a length of three hundred cubits, its width fifty cubits, and its height thirty cubit," and this coincides with the Durupinar structure's length (not exactly, but close enough).
Naturally, most geologists dismiss the idea that this formation might be a fossilized wooden boat out of hand. They say it is a natural landmark, produced by geological processes that are well understood, and they point out that a few thousands years generally isn’t long enough to fossilize wood.
- Ancient Greek Vase Artists Painted Images of Biblical Figures Noah and Nimrod Over 2,000 Years Ago
- Kuh-e Alvand: Searching for the True Mountain of Noah and his Ark
In fact the identification of Durupinar as Noah’s Ark has long been controversial. It is notable that the first individual to forcefully champion this idea, former US Merchant Marine and amateur researcher David Fasold, eventually changed his mind and in 1997 testimony he labeled the claim that Noah’s Ark had been discovered at the Durupinar site as “absolute BS.”
Supposedly, before passing away a few years ago Fasold was having second thoughts about his second thoughts, although there is no actual proof of this. What is known that in his initial examination of the site in the 1980s, Fasold and his team used ground-penetrating radar to sudy the Durupinar formation, and they claim to have found a structure beneath the surface that perfectly matched what would have been the upper deck of Noah’s legendary vessel. Intriguingly, they also found some unique stones with holes in them (known as drogue stones) that they said would have been attached to the ark to be used as anchors.
The Durupinar site as seen from the Na’hum Gemisi visitor center bluff in the Agri region of eastern Turkey. (Wikkiwooki/CC BY-SA 4.0).
No Proof, but an Intriguing Discovery Nonetheless
It is hard to imagine any scenario where mainstream geologists would take the theory that this rock formation is a fossilized Noah’s Ark seriously. But the goal of the Mount Ararat and Noah’s Ark Research Team was to add scientific legitimacy to the search for the ark, and their discovery that the ark’s alleged landing site was once under water certainly counts as a legitimate and notable discovery in this context. They view the section of Genesis that recounts the story of the biblical flood and Noah’s response to it as history rather than myth, and from the perspective of those who share this view this find was both expected and highly revealing.
"The evidence suggests that the story might have a basis in reality," the researchers have stated, taking care not to exaggerate the significance of their find while still acknowledging its scientific importance.
Top image: Overhead view of the Durupinar formation, near Mount Ararat in Turkey.
Source: NoahsArkScans.
By Nathan Falde
