All  
Dinosaur

Scientist dismissed after soft tissue found on dinosaur fossil

Print

A microscope scientist working for California State University has been fired following the discovery that a Triceratops horn still contained soft tissue complete with bone cells “that look alive”, according to a report in CBS Los Angeles . The scientist, whose analysis of the Triceratops horn was published in the peer-reviewed scientific journal, is also an evangelical creationist, and claimed that the finding supports the view that Earth is 6,000 years old and that dinosaurs roamed the planet around 4,000 years ago. While the university claims the scientist, Mark Armitage, was fired for allowing his religion to interfere with his work, Armitage is suing the University for wrongful dismissal on the basis of violation to freedom of speech and academic freedom. 

Mark Armitage, a published scientist of over 30 years, was working at the Hell Creek Formation excavation site in Montanaa when he discovered one of the largest Triceratops horns ever unearthed at the site. According to conventional perspectives, the Triceratops is a genus of herbivorous dinosaur that first appeared in the late Cretaceous period, about 68 million years ago in what is now North America, and became extinct around 66 million years ago.

Example of a Triceratops horn

Example of a Triceratops horn. Photo source .

Armitage studied the fossil in the California State University lab using a high-powered miscroscope and was stunned to find soft tissue complete with bone cells.  According to Armitage, the preservation of such cells is a scientific impossibility if the dinosaur really walked the Earth over 66 million years ago. On this basis, he felt it was not unreasonable to open discussion with colleagues and students about the implications of such a finding being that the creationist perspective is correct and that dinosaurs existed much later than mainstream science maintains. The results of Armitage’s analysis of the soft tissue was eventually published in July 2013 in the journal Acta Histochemica . Nevertheless, Armitage was fired from the University of California, which he is now fighting in court.

“Terminating an employee because of their religious views is completely inappropriate and illegal,” said Attorney Brad Dacus of Pacific Justice Institute. “But doing so in an attempt to silence scientific speech at a public university is even more alarming. This should be a wakeup call and warning to the entire world of academia.”

While numerous examples of suppression of ‘academic freedom’ can be cited in which scientists have been discriminated against for presenting views that conflict with mainstream perspectives, Armitage made the ‘unscientific’ mistake of assuming that the dinosaur must be only several thousand years old simply because the process in which the cells were preserved was not understood by him.

In fact, the finding of the soft tissue is not the first of its kind.  Several ground-breaking discoveries in the last decade have revealed preserved soft tissue on dinosaur remains, such as the recent finding of 68-milion-year-old soft tissue from the bones of a Tyrannosaurus rex. However, Mary Schweitzer, a molecular paleontologist at North Carolina State University, who headed up the research on the T. rex remains, explained that the soft tissue was able to be preserved by iron in the dinosaur’s body, which preserved the tissue before it could decay.

The legal case surrounding Armitage’s dismissal opens up many important questions about academic freedom, whether science and religion can ever truly coexist in harmony, and what knowledge may be unravelled by the discovery of preserved cells in the remains of dinosaurs.

Featured image: A Triceratops. Source: BigStockPhoto

By April Holloway

Comments

Roberto Peron's picture

You only have academic freedom if you don't make waves and accept the dogma of the mainstream.  Don't do that and you get the axe and your career is ruined beyond repair.  Science?  LOL I think not!!

 

DeAegean's picture


Modern Humans are actually evolved from Dinosaurs, aliens.

The article states, "scientist, whose analysis of the Triceratops horn was published in the peer-reviewed scientific journal". Peer-reviewed means his colleagues approved his research and conclusions. The article states, "On this basis, he felt it was not unreasonable to open discussion with colleagues and students about the implications of such a finding being that the creationist perspective is correct and that dinosaurs existed much later than mainstream science maintains". Who should he be discussing it with if not his colleagues and students? I am not religious and yet I think we should always allow scientists to have open ideas and be allowed to debate these ideas in an open forum especially amongst his colleagues and students. This is open-minded thinking. Science should question everything and it should be open to critique and debate. Another point I take issue with is that he is a published scientist of over 30 years experience and yet did not know about the previous cell research of the T-Rex. Has anyone else wondered why he did not know about it? I know I never heard of it before. Could it be because it was not made public? Could it have been kept covered up because of the controversy it may have caused? I wonder how many other findings have been kept quiet, probably many. Many people, not only religious people, question scientific standard timelines. We do find many references to dragons, we find carvings of dinosaurs, we find mythology of giant creatures, and we find creatures once thought extinct still existing today. We certainly do not know everything and stopping open debate is not going to help figure these things out.

nisa burkay's picture

I dont think anyone should be fired for their beliefs but also they should not try to force science to fit into their views, If the same thing has been found before those specimens also should be scrutinized and compared.

 

Nisa Carroll Burkay

Where does it say they will not carbon date the tissue? You are just making assumptions to fit your theory.

Pages

Next article