All  
Copernicus and the Principle documentary

Radical new documentary claims Copernicus and four centuries of science is wrong

Print

A new documentary called The Principle , which is due to be launched on 10th October, is set to take on more than four centuries of established belief in the Copernican Principle by presenting shocking new scientific evidence that suggests the Earth holds a special place within the cosmos. The film has already resulted in an absolute media frenzy, smear campaign, and storm of controversy as furious scientists vehemently defend their position – and that’s before they have even seen the evidence. Could we be on the edge of a radical new understanding of our universe and our place within it? Rick Delano, Writer and Producer of The Principle believes we are.

While most of us today assume that our brilliant scientific minds, space exploration programs, and high-tech telescopes and equipment have long since proven that the Earth orbits the sun, Mr Delano explains that no experimental evidence has ever been obtained that unequivocally proves this to be true. As historian Lincoln Barnett states in The Universe and Dr. Einstein , "We can't feel our motion through space, nor has any physical experiment ever proved that the Earth actually is in motion." Hence, Mr Delano states that the Copernican Principle is not a scientific fact, but rather a metaphysical assumption supported by profoundly convincing ideas and theories. His film, The Principle, is the first documentary ever to directly examine the scientific basis of the Copernican Principle by bringing together top scientific experts in a commentary, which he says, will leave us questioning our very place within the cosmos.

Ancient belief about our place within the cosmos

For thousands of years, there was a prevailing geocentric view of the cosmos, in which the Earth was believed to be the centre of the universe. By looking up at the sky and seeing the Sun, Moon, planets, and stars moving about Earth along circular paths day after day, it seemed evident to ancient people that the Earth was stationary and the rest of the universe moved around it.  Such a perspective was also in accordance with the God-centred worldview which maintained that a god or gods created us, and that there is a purpose to this creation.

Nevertheless, Mr Delano explained in an interview with Ancient Origins that “the ancients were more than intelligent enough to understand that the same observational phenomena would be equally attributable to a rotation of the earth on its axis.” So, why then was this perspective not adopted in ancient times?

“The simple truth is that the ancient world found it more plausible to believe that we were clearly the focus and centre of what we saw going around us,” added Delano.

Thus, the geocentric model of the universe came to be adopted as the predominant cosmological system in many ancient civilizations such as ancient Greece (from 4 th century BC), including the noteworthy systems of Aristotle and Ptolemy. The astronomical predictions of Ptolemy's geocentric model were used to prepare astrological and astronomical charts for over 1,500 years.

However, the work of Nicolaus Copernicus (1473 – 1543), a brilliant mathematician and astronomer from Royal Prussia, a region of the Kingdom of Poland, laid the foundations that eventually resulted in thousands of years of belief in a geocentric model of the cosmos being turned on its head.

The Ptolemaic Geocentric Model in the Principle

The Ptolemaic Geocentric Model. Source: Wikipedia

The Copernican Revolution

In his publication De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium (On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres) in 1543, Copernicus proposed the replacement of the geocentric system for a heliocentric model, in which the Earth and the other planets orbit the Sun, on the basis that heliocentrism could explain the motion of celestial bodies more simply than the geocentric view. The implication of this revolutionary idea was that Earth could no longer be seen as being in any central or specially favoured position, a concept which became known as the Copernican Principle.

This was shocking and it was met by one stubbornly resistant force – the Catholic Church.  After all, what would it really mean for civilization and religion to find that “we live on an insignificant planet of a humdrum star lost in a galaxy tucked away in some forgotten corner of a universe in which there are far more galaxies than people," as Carl Sagan succinctly expressed in the 20 th century?

Such a radical change in world-view could not happen overnight and indeed it was at least another century before Copernicus’s ideas came to be well established.  In the meantime, numerous scientists came forward to try to measure the Earth’s orbit around the Sun.

“For two centuries the greatest scientists in the world tried to come up with an experiment that would measure that motion of the earth around the sun, that everyone almost knew was obviously occurring,” explained Delano. “But paradoxically, for two centuries every one of these experiments that tried to measure this universally assumed motion of the Earth around the Sun kept returning a value of zero for the motion of the earth, and this became a really big issue in science.”

The Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe (1546-1601), a brilliant experimental scientist whose measurements of the positions of the stars and planets surpassed any that were made prior to the invention of the telescope, proposed a model that attempted to serve as a compromise between the geocentric explanation and the Copernican theory.  In this model, all planets except the Earth revolve around the Sun. In other words, the planets revolve around the Sun, and the Sun revolves around the Earth.

“The remarkable thing is that the Tycho system absolutely duplicates the observations we see in the sky just as the heliocentric system does. There is no visual distinction at all between the Tycho system and the Copernican system,” explained Delano.

Tycho Brahe's Geo-Heliocentric Model in the Principle

Tycho Brahe's Geo-Heliocentric Model. Image source: Wikipedia

Throughout the 16 th and 17 th centuries, huge advances were made in the field of astronomy and science through the work of Johannes Kepler, Galileo Galilei, and Isaac Newton, whose work is far too involved to be able to address adequately in this article. So we shall jump ahead to the 20 th century and the work of Albert Einstein.

Einstein, puzzled by the failure of every experiment to measure the universally assumed motion of the Earth around the Sun, searched for a reason to explain why this could not be measured. The result? Einstein’s famous Theory of Relativity. Shockingly, Einstein maintained that absolute motion cannot be detected by any optical experiment as no particular frame of reference is absolute. In other words, the physics works just as well to have the Earth at the centre with the Sun going around, as to have the Sun at the centre with the Earth going around.

Nevertheless, Einstein maintained that even though it may look like we are at the centre of the universe with all the galaxies moving away from us (as Edward Hubble observed through his telescope in the 1920s), this is only an illusion. He maintained that since space is not flat but curved, and since space is expanding, wherever one may be located in that space, the movement of the galaxies would appear to be radiating away from that point.  This theory certainly supported the Copernican Principle that there are no centres, no edges, and no special positions. According to Delano, here is where the big problem comes in.

Einstein’s flexible space/time

Einstein’s flexible space/time. Image source .

New cosmological observations challenge Copernican Principle

Over the last decade, a number of anomalous cosmological observations have emerged which do not make sense according to the Copernican Principle, the latest being the Planck satellite results of March 2013.  While the science behind the findings is complex, to put it simply, the Copernican Principle requires that any variation in the radiation from the Cosmic Microwave Background (thermal radiation assumed to be left over from the ‘Big Bang’) be more or less randomly distributed throughout the universe.  However, the results of three separate missions, starting with the WMAP satellite in 2001, has shown anomalies in the background radiation which are aligned directly with the plane of our solar system and the equator of the Earth. This never-before-seen alignment of the Earth results in an axis through the universe, which scientists have dubbed the ‘Axis of Evil’, owing to the shocking implications for current models of the cosmos.

Laurence Krauss, American theoretical physicist and cosmologist, commented in 2005:

When you look at [the cosmic microwave background] map, you also see that the structure that is observed, is in fact, in a weird way, correlated with the plane of the earth around the sun. Is this Copernicus coming back to haunt us? That’s crazy. We’re looking out at the whole universe. There’s no way there should be a correlation of structure with our motion of the earth around the sun — the plane of the earth around the sun — the ecliptic. That would say we are truly the center of the universe.

Cosmologists, astrophysicists, and others initially brushed off the strange finding as an artifact, and dozens of papers and reports followed trying to address the anomaly. But when the Planck results returned in March 2013, the alignment showed up in yet even higher resolution and detail, and has now been replicated across three separate missions, suggesting there is something more than an ‘artifact’ that is going on here.

“The thing that has really launched the media hysteria about our film, is that we are pulling the covers off the dirty little secret that not only is there structure, that structure is related in astonishing ways to one and precisely one location in the universe, and it happens to be us,” said Delano.

If there is something fundamentally wrong with the Cosmological and Copernican Principle, our entire picture of reality is about to change again, and the irony is that just like the last two great scientific revolutions, both were centred around this puzzling persistent question about our place in the cosmos.

Whether The Principle documentary presents a convincing enough argument to seriously undermine the Copernican Principle and more than four centuries of science remains to be seen. But one thing is for sure, come the October 10 launch date, we can’t wait to find out.

Part 2 coming soon – The large-scale attack of ‘The Principle’

Soon to be released – Interview with Rick Delano on ‘The Principle’

View the trailer of The Principle:

Featured image: The Copernican Model of the Cosmos. Image source

References:

Is there a violation of the Copernican principle in radio sky? – Cornell University Library

Planck Satellite Confirms WMAP Findings: Universe is not Copernican - Medium

Is the lopsided Universe telling us we need new theories? – Ars Technica

Planck shows almost perfect cosmos – plus axis of evil – New Scientist

The Fall of the Geocentric Theory, and the Rise of Heliocentrism – New Mexico State University

Cosmological Models through History – Physics of the Universe

Planck Science – European Space Agency

By April Holloway

Comments

You have a very intelligent retort to Mr. Atheist's post, but I would like to point out a couple of faults with your own arguments, as they seem to be aguing FOR a Biblical-based GOD/Christianity.
I am NO Atheist, but neither do I believe the Bible to be some kind of historical account of actual events relative to it's time.
I'm not going to write a tome to detract each point because that would be redundant, so I'll keep it short and we can debate each topic further as you wish.
As for the Bible being a mish-mash and willy-nilly, the research PROVES the main Old Testament Bible stories ARE retellings of earlier culture's (the Sumerians and Egypt) writings and beliefs.
There are simply way too many parellels to dismiss them as being coincidents.
The New Testament too, the life of Jesus, has many correlations to the Egyptian stories of Esau, son of Cleopatra.

The Bible itself has too many contradictions to ever be seriously considered as a "perfect word".

-----And whats with attatching God to it? These things really really annoy me. Pseudo Science at its best attempting to proove once again in a last ditched attempt that a judeo-christian God could possibly exist and make us all on a whim. Its not going to happen. -------

So you expose your bias. Frankly one can easily level the same accusation at you, as to why you insist on forcibly interpreting everything and even dismissing emperical evidence based on your paradigm that everything must be filtered through your personal religious philosophy of materialist atheism? The only ones desperate here to the point of embarassment in the face of overwhelming evidence has been the atheistic consensus which must continually rewrite its fables to accomodate their religion and make up all kinds of non-existent metaphysical particles and matter and bendy twisty turny physics and ad-hoc dimensions to keep the charade going.

-----A/multiple God/s could potentialy exist, sure, but there is no reason to believe religions that have blatently stolen half their stuff from earlier civilizations/religions and made up the other half willy nilly.-----

And you are obviously the supreme omnipotent authority to know all this and inform us as to what's what, right?

-------Attempting to make actual scientific laws whilst using a blatent lie as your base cant end well and i quite simply am just going to walk away from anyone that attempts to prove me wrong on that, you cant argue with stupid.-----

Oh my, we have a hypocite in our midst who can't even himself prove or maintain the fables and principles he believes in, but you're stupid for trying to make scientific laws around something other than his unproven myths! But don't argue with him, he knows everything, and his proof is chiefly that he has said so! A real King Solomon!

-----Not saying the stories arnt cool, but dont try and make the laws of the universe attempt to fit your personal belief system, the universe doesnt give a toss about what you think and in the grand scheme of things-----

That's funny, the universe right now is demonstrating that it doesn't give a toss to the entire and current foundation of 19th-20th Century's scientific evolutionary consensus belief system.

------ wether a god exists or not is completly irrelivent, either there is no god, so meh, or theres a god and this is all his/her/their doing and you cant change anything anyways and we're all just puppets dancing to another beings tune.

There's an awful lot of emotions and vitirol flying around for something so 'irrelevant'... And you no more dance like a puppet for God than you do for a scientific establishment or the President or the United Nations who set laws and policies. The only exception is that God the creator knows better than them and you can ignore God, the same way you can jump off a cliff ignoring gravity to your own demise.

------I reject god on the principle that im my own person, if God made me then thanks, but ill take it from here and he/she/it/they has/have no right to interfere, wether that be in life or death.-------

Ah vanity... alright then, you have now exercised your God-given free will, so thy will be done... and to you thy own consequences.

----Im going to have to watch this program deffinatly, and if they change my mind then awesome, but im about 99.9% sure this is a case of "Ancient Aliens" attempting to explain the universe.-----

Good, because all your fellow atheist friends are on there and you can listen to them comfirm for you the same thing you are hoping is all just a bad dream that you can brush away as being a case of 'aliens' which ironically is in keeping with your own passionate views about about how you aren't yet able to explore the entirety of the universe, so it's funny that you yourself dismiss that which you ought to believe on your own grounds...

Don't get mad, bro.

"So one half of the universe is hot, the other half cold, or + and - if you like"

 

>> That in itself is a dramatic challenge to consensus cosmology.

But it is much more serious than that.

 

Not only is one side of the universe warmer than the other- the temperature fluctuations themselves are not random. When decomposed into multipoles (spherical harmonics), they define a special, preferred direction- an "Axis of Evil"- across the cosmos.

 

But wait.

 

There's more.

 

This "Axis" is not just any special direction.

 

It happens to be closely aligned with the ecliptic and equinoxes of the one location in the cosmos we *know* has observers intelligent enough to build the telescopes necessary to notice.

 

All of this is, of course, completely contrary to the Copernican Principle.

 

And the Copernican Principle lies at the very foundation of modern consensus cosmology.

Please write out in longhand the word "infinitely" 500 times

"smart alec"

Pages

Next article