All  
Copernicus and the Principle documentary

Radical new documentary claims Copernicus and four centuries of science is wrong

Print

A new documentary called The Principle , which is due to be launched on 10th October, is set to take on more than four centuries of established belief in the Copernican Principle by presenting shocking new scientific evidence that suggests the Earth holds a special place within the cosmos. The film has already resulted in an absolute media frenzy, smear campaign, and storm of controversy as furious scientists vehemently defend their position – and that’s before they have even seen the evidence. Could we be on the edge of a radical new understanding of our universe and our place within it? Rick Delano, Writer and Producer of The Principle believes we are.

While most of us today assume that our brilliant scientific minds, space exploration programs, and high-tech telescopes and equipment have long since proven that the Earth orbits the sun, Mr Delano explains that no experimental evidence has ever been obtained that unequivocally proves this to be true. As historian Lincoln Barnett states in The Universe and Dr. Einstein , "We can't feel our motion through space, nor has any physical experiment ever proved that the Earth actually is in motion." Hence, Mr Delano states that the Copernican Principle is not a scientific fact, but rather a metaphysical assumption supported by profoundly convincing ideas and theories. His film, The Principle, is the first documentary ever to directly examine the scientific basis of the Copernican Principle by bringing together top scientific experts in a commentary, which he says, will leave us questioning our very place within the cosmos.

Ancient belief about our place within the cosmos

For thousands of years, there was a prevailing geocentric view of the cosmos, in which the Earth was believed to be the centre of the universe. By looking up at the sky and seeing the Sun, Moon, planets, and stars moving about Earth along circular paths day after day, it seemed evident to ancient people that the Earth was stationary and the rest of the universe moved around it.  Such a perspective was also in accordance with the God-centred worldview which maintained that a god or gods created us, and that there is a purpose to this creation.

Nevertheless, Mr Delano explained in an interview with Ancient Origins that “the ancients were more than intelligent enough to understand that the same observational phenomena would be equally attributable to a rotation of the earth on its axis.” So, why then was this perspective not adopted in ancient times?

“The simple truth is that the ancient world found it more plausible to believe that we were clearly the focus and centre of what we saw going around us,” added Delano.

Thus, the geocentric model of the universe came to be adopted as the predominant cosmological system in many ancient civilizations such as ancient Greece (from 4 th century BC), including the noteworthy systems of Aristotle and Ptolemy. The astronomical predictions of Ptolemy's geocentric model were used to prepare astrological and astronomical charts for over 1,500 years.

However, the work of Nicolaus Copernicus (1473 – 1543), a brilliant mathematician and astronomer from Royal Prussia, a region of the Kingdom of Poland, laid the foundations that eventually resulted in thousands of years of belief in a geocentric model of the cosmos being turned on its head.

The Ptolemaic Geocentric Model in the Principle

The Ptolemaic Geocentric Model. Source: Wikipedia

The Copernican Revolution

In his publication De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium (On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres) in 1543, Copernicus proposed the replacement of the geocentric system for a heliocentric model, in which the Earth and the other planets orbit the Sun, on the basis that heliocentrism could explain the motion of celestial bodies more simply than the geocentric view. The implication of this revolutionary idea was that Earth could no longer be seen as being in any central or specially favoured position, a concept which became known as the Copernican Principle.

This was shocking and it was met by one stubbornly resistant force – the Catholic Church.  After all, what would it really mean for civilization and religion to find that “we live on an insignificant planet of a humdrum star lost in a galaxy tucked away in some forgotten corner of a universe in which there are far more galaxies than people," as Carl Sagan succinctly expressed in the 20 th century?

Such a radical change in world-view could not happen overnight and indeed it was at least another century before Copernicus’s ideas came to be well established.  In the meantime, numerous scientists came forward to try to measure the Earth’s orbit around the Sun.

“For two centuries the greatest scientists in the world tried to come up with an experiment that would measure that motion of the earth around the sun, that everyone almost knew was obviously occurring,” explained Delano. “But paradoxically, for two centuries every one of these experiments that tried to measure this universally assumed motion of the Earth around the Sun kept returning a value of zero for the motion of the earth, and this became a really big issue in science.”

The Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe (1546-1601), a brilliant experimental scientist whose measurements of the positions of the stars and planets surpassed any that were made prior to the invention of the telescope, proposed a model that attempted to serve as a compromise between the geocentric explanation and the Copernican theory.  In this model, all planets except the Earth revolve around the Sun. In other words, the planets revolve around the Sun, and the Sun revolves around the Earth.

“The remarkable thing is that the Tycho system absolutely duplicates the observations we see in the sky just as the heliocentric system does. There is no visual distinction at all between the Tycho system and the Copernican system,” explained Delano.

Tycho Brahe's Geo-Heliocentric Model in the Principle

Tycho Brahe's Geo-Heliocentric Model. Image source: Wikipedia

Throughout the 16 th and 17 th centuries, huge advances were made in the field of astronomy and science through the work of Johannes Kepler, Galileo Galilei, and Isaac Newton, whose work is far too involved to be able to address adequately in this article. So we shall jump ahead to the 20 th century and the work of Albert Einstein.

Einstein, puzzled by the failure of every experiment to measure the universally assumed motion of the Earth around the Sun, searched for a reason to explain why this could not be measured. The result? Einstein’s famous Theory of Relativity. Shockingly, Einstein maintained that absolute motion cannot be detected by any optical experiment as no particular frame of reference is absolute. In other words, the physics works just as well to have the Earth at the centre with the Sun going around, as to have the Sun at the centre with the Earth going around.

Nevertheless, Einstein maintained that even though it may look like we are at the centre of the universe with all the galaxies moving away from us (as Edward Hubble observed through his telescope in the 1920s), this is only an illusion. He maintained that since space is not flat but curved, and since space is expanding, wherever one may be located in that space, the movement of the galaxies would appear to be radiating away from that point.  This theory certainly supported the Copernican Principle that there are no centres, no edges, and no special positions. According to Delano, here is where the big problem comes in.

Einstein’s flexible space/time

Einstein’s flexible space/time. Image source .

New cosmological observations challenge Copernican Principle

Over the last decade, a number of anomalous cosmological observations have emerged which do not make sense according to the Copernican Principle, the latest being the Planck satellite results of March 2013.  While the science behind the findings is complex, to put it simply, the Copernican Principle requires that any variation in the radiation from the Cosmic Microwave Background (thermal radiation assumed to be left over from the ‘Big Bang’) be more or less randomly distributed throughout the universe.  However, the results of three separate missions, starting with the WMAP satellite in 2001, has shown anomalies in the background radiation which are aligned directly with the plane of our solar system and the equator of the Earth. This never-before-seen alignment of the Earth results in an axis through the universe, which scientists have dubbed the ‘Axis of Evil’, owing to the shocking implications for current models of the cosmos.

Laurence Krauss, American theoretical physicist and cosmologist, commented in 2005:

When you look at [the cosmic microwave background] map, you also see that the structure that is observed, is in fact, in a weird way, correlated with the plane of the earth around the sun. Is this Copernicus coming back to haunt us? That’s crazy. We’re looking out at the whole universe. There’s no way there should be a correlation of structure with our motion of the earth around the sun — the plane of the earth around the sun — the ecliptic. That would say we are truly the center of the universe.

Cosmologists, astrophysicists, and others initially brushed off the strange finding as an artifact, and dozens of papers and reports followed trying to address the anomaly. But when the Planck results returned in March 2013, the alignment showed up in yet even higher resolution and detail, and has now been replicated across three separate missions, suggesting there is something more than an ‘artifact’ that is going on here.

“The thing that has really launched the media hysteria about our film, is that we are pulling the covers off the dirty little secret that not only is there structure, that structure is related in astonishing ways to one and precisely one location in the universe, and it happens to be us,” said Delano.

If there is something fundamentally wrong with the Cosmological and Copernican Principle, our entire picture of reality is about to change again, and the irony is that just like the last two great scientific revolutions, both were centred around this puzzling persistent question about our place in the cosmos.

Whether The Principle documentary presents a convincing enough argument to seriously undermine the Copernican Principle and more than four centuries of science remains to be seen. But one thing is for sure, come the October 10 launch date, we can’t wait to find out.

Part 2 coming soon – The large-scale attack of ‘The Principle’

Soon to be released – Interview with Rick Delano on ‘The Principle’

View the trailer of The Principle:

Featured image: The Copernican Model of the Cosmos. Image source

References:

Is there a violation of the Copernican principle in radio sky? – Cornell University Library

Planck Satellite Confirms WMAP Findings: Universe is not Copernican - Medium

Is the lopsided Universe telling us we need new theories? – Ars Technica

Planck shows almost perfect cosmos – plus axis of evil – New Scientist

The Fall of the Geocentric Theory, and the Rise of Heliocentrism – New Mexico State University

Cosmological Models through History – Physics of the Universe

Planck Science – European Space Agency

By April Holloway

Comments

The religious equivalent to the Sun revolving around the Earth would be God revolving around Us. Some acient cultures made deity and the sun equivalent, so to wisely resolve any discrepancy. The historical fact of heliocentrism resulted from the poor observational skills of early occidental cultures, increased by their also poor cosmogony and mythology. There will always be such kind of people, but any of them is free to wake up anytime, as the tools of science are humanly accesible. Existence is finite though, so don't hesitate much about doing so.

If you will consider the laws of physics, anything that would have the Sun orbiting the Earth is blatantly impossible and to consider it real would be the greatest conceitedness of humanity. Orbits are determined by mass and gravitational effects, and not even "God" would set up such a screwy exception. Whatever "The Principle" has to say, it may not be worth more than a way to get the authors some attention for a few weeks and ridicule for a lifetime. You want to be famous? You got it. I hope you're happy.

Rick Delano is quite a guy—I'm not kidding!

If persistence and dogged faith, unencumbered by burden of fact is a virtue then Rick certainly "takes the cake". For those who are interested, search for "Rick Delano" in your favorite search engine, and feast your sense of humor on the dialogs that he becomes enmeshed in on comment boards such as this one.

Those with a modicum of background in the sciences will find that these exchanges, while incredibly tedious are a curious—and at times hilarious—study of human belief and behavior. No matter how many times he gets his *ss handed to him, he still comes back punching

It's perhaps a bit of a shame that a guy like Delano, who seems intelligent and even talented, has squandered his abilities on such a hopeless idea. Don Quixote move aside.

Delano's case is a textbook example one of the big pitfalls facing those who embrace fundamentalist dogma, that is, an inability to render information that challenges their pre-conceived notions. It is tempting to cast such characters as dullards, but the case of Delano certainly challenges this assumption, as he managed to produce a film—not easy at all—and is very adept at using language and presenting arguments that are convincing—at least to the uniformed.

I'm hoping to hear back from Rick, as he always has something pointed, and ironically hilarious to say. Come on, Rick!

1. BY SCIENTISTS & their Engineers: Deliberately-placed pollutants in the environment: chemtrails, fluoride, radiation, oil spills, heribicides & pesticides, sterile seeds, re-engineered plagues.

2. Changes to our astronomical situation have not been discussed in the public domain, not at all.

3. The food chain has been corrupted, defiled and wasted, while people are starving, no thanks to Agribus and the useless Federal bureaucrazy.

4. Medical science knows how to cure disease; however, Big Pharma and Big Govt prefer to profiteer on disease rather than cure and heal it.

5. Social sciences based on a false and faked human history only 6000 years of age lacks the depth of experience in Law that provides consistent and regular experiences we call "Justice," especially in the face of ET intrusions and abductions.

If you want to believe in Scientism, you can do so, but the cost appears to me to be very high.

oonyuudou's picture

It amuses me how so many people can get upset about their faith in either an old book (made up and edited over the centuries as much for political control as anything else) or their faith in science (which is still new and developing as time goes on).

Earth is special because I'm here...and yes I suppose becuase you're all here too, but that doesn't mean we should get all high and mighty about how important we are compared to the rest of the universe. We know a fantastic amount thanks to science but equally this amounts to practically nothing, we're still learing new things about our own planet and solar system let alone what lies beyond but at least science helps us learn!

If you must put your faith in a book that is outdated and which does not have the ability nor desire to change with facts then that's great for you; I sincerely hope it brings you happiness and contentment. However for the rest of us who are able to be open minded, there are many free online courses that can help you learn the "too indepth science" which this article eludes to and at least then you can make up your own mind.

In my opinion (and I recognise most won't care), science does not have all the answers but at least it is adaptable although this does take time. It finds ways to get us into space, to feed us, help us work and communicate and a thousand other things that we take for granted; far more than blind faith can ever do.

ओं मणिपद्मे हूं

Pages

Next article