This is the account of the discovery of a skull that has the potential to change what we know about human evolution, and a suppression and cover-up which followed.
In 1959, in an area called Chalkidiki in Petralona, Northern Greece, a shepherd came across a small opening to a cave, which became visible when a thick covering of snow finally melted. He gathered a group of villagers to help him clear the entrance so they could go inside and explore. They found a cave rich in stalactites and stalagmites. But they also found something surprising – a human skull embedded in the wall (later research also uncovered a huge number of fossils including pre-human species, animal hair, fossilized wood, and stone and bone tools).
The skull was given to the University of Thessaloniki in Greece by the President of the Petralona Community. The agreement was that once the research was done, a museum would be opened featuring the findings from the Petralona cave, and the skull would be returned to be displayed in the museum – something that never happened.
Dr Aris Poulianos, member of the UNESCO's IUAES (International Union of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences), later founder of the Anthropological Association of Greece, and an expert anthropologist who was working at the University of Moscow at the time, was invited by the Prime Minister of Greece to return to Greece to take a position of a University Chair in Athens. This was due to the publication of his book, ‘The Origins of the Greeks’, which provides excellent research showing that Greek people didn’t originate from the Slavic nations but were indigenous to Greece. Upon his return to Greece, Dr Poulianos was made aware of the discovery of the skull at Petralona, and immediately started studying the Petralona cave and skull.
The ‘Petralona man’, or Archanthropus of Petralona, as it has since been called, was found to be 700,000 years old, making it the oldest human europeoid (presenting European traits) of that age ever discovered in Europe. Dr Poulianos’ research showed that the Petralona man evolved separately in Europe and was not an ancestor of a species that came out of Africa.
In 1964, independent German researchers, Breitinger and Sickenberg, tried to dismiss Dr Poulianos’ findings, arguing that the skull was only 50,000 years old and was indeed an ancestor that came from Africa. However, research published in the US in 1971 in the prestigious Archaeology magazine, backed up the findings that the skull was indeed 700,000 years old. This was based on an analysis of the cave’s stratigraphy and the sediment in which the skull was embedded. Further research in the cave discovered isolated teeth and two pre-human skeletons dating back 800,000 years, as well as other fossils of various species.
Today, most academics who have analyzed the Petralona remains say that the cranium of the Archanthropus of Petralona belongs to an archaic hominid distinguished from Homo erectus, and from both the classic Neanderthals and anatomically modern humans, but showing characterists of all those species and presenting strong European traits. A skull dating back 700,000 which is either Homo sapien or part Homo sapien is in direct conflict with the Out of Africa theory of human evolution.
Further excavations continued in the cave of Petralona with the participation of international researchers (46 specialists from 12 separate countries), which provided further proof of Dr Poulianos’ claims, including remarkable findings like fossilized pieces of wood, an oak leaf, animal hair and coprolites, which enabled accurate dating, as well as the almost continuous presence of stone and bone tools of the Archanthropus evolutionary stage, from the lower (750,000 years) to the upper (550,000 years) layers of sediment within the cave.
The research, after an interruption due to the dictatorship in Greece, continued up to 1983. It was then ordered by the government that all excavations at the site were forbidden to anyone, including the original archaeological team, and for 15 years nobody had access to the site or to the findings – no reason was provided by the government. Was this denial of access to prevent the extraction of whatever new scientific conclusions remained hidden within the incredible fossils embedded within the layers of the caves’ walls?
After the Anthropological Society of Greece took the case to the courts, 15 years later they were again allowed access to the cave. Since then the Ministry of Culture is trying in any way to overcome the Courts decision and further trials proceed.
Dr Poulianos’ findings contradicted conventional views regarding human evolution and his research was suppressed. Dr Poulianos and his wife were physically attacked and injured in their home in 2012 and the culprits were never found. He and his team have been denied further access to the cave to complete their research and study, and the whereabouts of the skull is now unknown.
Today a sign sits outside the cave of Petralona stating that the skull found in the cave was 300,000 years old, and on Wikipedia today you will see references dismissing the evidence and trying to date the Petralona skull within acceptable parameters – between 160,000 and 240,000 years old.
Recently, Professor C.G. Nicholas Mascie-Taylor of the University of Cambridge sent a letter to the Ministry of Culture in Greece saying that the correct date of the skull is 700,000 years old and not 300,000. He has also challenged the government’s suppression of information regarding this incredible discovery.
The Greek Ministry of Education, Religions, Culture and Sports,
Bouboulinas 20-22,
Athens 106 82,
Greece
5 September 2012
Dear Sir,
I am writing on behalf of the European Anthropological Association, which is the umbrella professional and academic association linking all of the national European biological anthropology and human biology societies, to express our concerns about the conservation of the Petralona Cave and Skull, the misinformation of the dating of the skull, as well as the treatment of personnel associated with the conservation of the Cave.
The bases of our concerns are that the skull has been damaged through many scratches and the crown of a tooth (1st molar) cut off. As requested by Anthropological Association of Greece what is required is a detailed description of the present status of the skull, so that no one in future can arbitrarily damage it further. There is also the problem of dating which has been scientifically dated at about 700,000 years ago not 300,000 as is given at the information desk. There is a very detailed record of the excavations and findings which need to receive further public presentation but which have never been catalogued so as to prevent specimens going missing.
It is very unfortunate that the Greek Archaeological Department stopped Dr Aris Poulianos from further work in the Cave without any explanation. It is also very worrying that Dr Poulianos and his wife were physically attacked and injured in their home earlier this year and the culprits have not been found. He was also verbally abused when attempting to give an invited presentation to teachers and school children.
Senior anthropologists and geologists have also been denied access to the Cave and the specimens for further study on a number of occasions without substantive reasons. Earlier this year there has also been misinformation given to the Greek Parliament concerning financial aspects of the Cave.
I look forward to receiving answers to these questions.
Yours faithfully
Professor C G N Mascie-Taylor MA, PhD, ScD (all Cambridge), FSB, FNAS (Hungary)
Professor of Human Population Biology and Health and President of the European Anthropological Association
The most important conclusion of Dr Poulianos' research regards the co-existence of all main anthropological types (African – Kobi, Asian – Beijing and European – Petralona) at the same almost period (700,000, 500,000 and 750,000 respectively). That means: the appearance of the today human main populations (races or even better phyllae - from the Greek language and that’s why polyphyletic etc) is tending to almost 1,000,000 m.y.a. and not to only 10,000 or 30,000 years as currently considered world wide.
However, independently if there is a scientific dispute on the above, it is only sad to become aware that research is not allowed to those who are not coordinated to the “standard” knowledge, risking even their lives in front of gun shooters.
Is this a cover up of an incredible discovery that the powers-that-be do not want us to have access to? You be the judge.
Update from editor 31 December, 2018: Dr Poulianos wrote to Ancient Origins to state that unfortunately the suppression of information regarding the Petralona skull has continued:
“Experiencing the above I am asserting that the prohibition of research regarding human history is due to the following (most obvious, i.e. not exposing political) reasons:
Various (Worldwide) Universities and their state allied forums have the power to influence all of the small range national institutions in order to achieve the aforementioned prohibition. In turn, this is most probably due to the fact that such research is allowed only to some “confidential” persons. Thus, re-righting chapters of human history is only their “right”. Whoever does not belong to such clubs and / or forums has to be stopped by all existing means, even by falsifying the truth against well documented evidence (i.e. without providing any scientific contradicting argument). Obviously I am asserting that knowledge is under control, especially what concerns human history. Therefore I agree with Lenie Reedijk’s description regarding the “Cover Up”, as well as the following comments to her article.”
By John Black
Related Links
The 40th Anniversary since the discovery of the Petralona Archanthropus' skull
The significance of the fossil hominid skull from Petralona, Greece
Related Videos



Comments
Dr. Poulianos new discoveries
Permalink
I try to read most of the comments here , but I would like to add something to the main article .
Dr. Poulianos in 1996 made new discoveries at Petralona caves and specially he found primitive stone and quartz tools among a human shin that was calculated to be of standing man , the surprising in that discovery is that many institutes around the world , accorded that the age of the bone and tools are 11 - 12 million years old. For the dating was used cave stromatography and electron spin . The age for "Lucy" from Africa is 3- 4 million years .
So I wonder , why a human to live in a place that reach 50 to 60 Celsius the day , when he could live and prosper better in a temperate clima , with better water reservoirs, better fishing areas, and better hunting possibilities .
Best Regards to all
Keep Calm, and Consider Other Factors
Permalink
Anthropos323 makes a valid point. Discoveries can only be gained by maintaining a calm emotional compsure and by focusing on facts. Nonetheless, there needs to be further in depth research regarding on this matter. Research on this needs to be continued. We also have to consider about the climate and the terrain during the Prehistoric World as well. I'm not an expert in palaeoanthropology so please excuse me if my explanation isn't well refined. My thoughts however are these ~ Bones and fossil finds alone aren't enough to pin point the origins. We must consider other various factors such as environment too. Hominid species, as well as most primates in general, would need vegetation and warmer weather to thrive in. Such a habitat offers abundancy in fruits, insects and trees (diet and habitat respectively). As far as environment is concerned, Africa appears to have a more suitable habitat for hominid and primate species than Europe. Africa was and is also home to various megafauna. Not sure if this leads to any conclusions, though all I'm mentioning is that we have to think and reflect on other factors (e.g. habitat, possibility, climatology etc.) as well. Different opinions are welcomed, but let's try to have a civil discussion going on. Like I mentioned before, discoveries can only be made by being calm, emotions under control and by focusing on facts. Facts and findings are the ones that should not be controlled. It is peoples' attitudes that need to be. And lastly, we need to get Dr. Poulianos to safety from government intervention.
So let me get this straight..
Permalink
In reply to out of africa by steve howse (not verified)
So let me get this straight....you're claiming that people don't like the out of Africa theory because they are unable to differentiate between Africa(a large landmass) and black Africans(a large group of humans) against whom they hold racial prejudices?
That's funny. You first presume, sight unseen, that all dissenters are racists. Having made that incredible leap, you further surmise that these people cannot tell the difference between a continental landmass and the people who currently occupy it. In your mind, this explains dislike of the OOA theory. In my mind, it shows how far afield you people will run in trying to avoid a scientfic discussion of the subject. If disagreement with the OOA theory is wrong scientifically, it can be demonstrated without any need to even mention racism, nor any feaux moral posturing.
out of africa
Permalink
There are many who will due to the ideas of white/Asian/Arabic supremacy indoctrination/political/religious theories grab at any straw that suggest we (homo sapiens) did not evolve in Africa. I`m afraid to say as having 2 thirds northern European and 1 third American Indian ancestors, I`m proud to have Neanderthal and Denisovan genetic heritage as well as having a family tree that left Africa about 250,000 years ago. Sadly this is a horrifying thought for many. Anything that might support their world view will grasped at, no matter how ridiculous.
I agree, unsubstantiated
Permalink
In reply to Yeah, I can see what you mean by Tim Mullins (not verified)
I agree, unsubstantiated opinion does not make for scientific evidence. But claims made based on the available scientific evidence (as the majority are in evolutionary biology as well as in human evolution), no matter how scarce the evidence may be, is in fact backed by some evidence (at least) and scientists are generally careful to provide you with the data from which those interpretation/conclusions were derived. If your concern is with the statistical significance of such finds, then I agree as well in terms of the overall sample size of the fossil record. While it is most certainly more vast than what would fit in a single coffin, It is no secret that scientists in this case are working with a very limited sample, albeit one that spans a range of 7 million years (from Tchadensis to Sapien). However, recent DNA analyses have added great strength to our sample sizes and may be considered statistically significant indeed. For instance, it has been determined that chimps and hominins split at the 7 million year mark, consistent with the fossil record, and dare I mention that chimps also only live in Africa... Also, lets not forget that recent DNA studies derived from the modern Sapien genome have presented some very interesting discoveries that substantiate the fossil record. You mention a "recent discovery on the Arabian Peninsula"... may I trouble you for a reference of some sort?... I'd be interested in reading about what it is you are implying. Unless of course it is just unsubstantiated opinion. Cheers!
Pagination