This is the account of the discovery of a skull that has the potential to change what we know about human evolution, and a suppression and cover-up which followed.
In 1959, in an area called Chalkidiki in Petralona, Northern Greece, a shepherd came across a small opening to a cave, which became visible when a thick covering of snow finally melted. He gathered a group of villagers to help him clear the entrance so they could go inside and explore. They found a cave rich in stalactites and stalagmites. But they also found something surprising – a human skull embedded in the wall (later research also uncovered a huge number of fossils including pre-human species, animal hair, fossilized wood, and stone and bone tools).
The skull was given to the University of Thessaloniki in Greece by the President of the Petralona Community. The agreement was that once the research was done, a museum would be opened featuring the findings from the Petralona cave, and the skull would be returned to be displayed in the museum – something that never happened.
Dr Aris Poulianos, member of the UNESCO's IUAES (International Union of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences), later founder of the Anthropological Association of Greece, and an expert anthropologist who was working at the University of Moscow at the time, was invited by the Prime Minister of Greece to return to Greece to take a position of a University Chair in Athens. This was due to the publication of his book, ‘The Origins of the Greeks’, which provides excellent research showing that Greek people didn’t originate from the Slavic nations but were indigenous to Greece. Upon his return to Greece, Dr Poulianos was made aware of the discovery of the skull at Petralona, and immediately started studying the Petralona cave and skull.
The ‘Petralona man’, or Archanthropus of Petralona, as it has since been called, was found to be 700,000 years old, making it the oldest human europeoid (presenting European traits) of that age ever discovered in Europe. Dr Poulianos’ research showed that the Petralona man evolved separately in Europe and was not an ancestor of a species that came out of Africa.
In 1964, independent German researchers, Breitinger and Sickenberg, tried to dismiss Dr Poulianos’ findings, arguing that the skull was only 50,000 years old and was indeed an ancestor that came from Africa. However, research published in the US in 1971 in the prestigious Archaeology magazine, backed up the findings that the skull was indeed 700,000 years old. This was based on an analysis of the cave’s stratigraphy and the sediment in which the skull was embedded. Further research in the cave discovered isolated teeth and two pre-human skeletons dating back 800,000 years, as well as other fossils of various species.
Today, most academics who have analyzed the Petralona remains say that the cranium of the Archanthropus of Petralona belongs to an archaic hominid distinguished from Homo erectus, and from both the classic Neanderthals and anatomically modern humans, but showing characterists of all those species and presenting strong European traits. A skull dating back 700,000 which is either Homo sapien or part Homo sapien is in direct conflict with the Out of Africa theory of human evolution.
Further excavations continued in the cave of Petralona with the participation of international researchers (46 specialists from 12 separate countries), which provided further proof of Dr Poulianos’ claims, including remarkable findings like fossilized pieces of wood, an oak leaf, animal hair and coprolites, which enabled accurate dating, as well as the almost continuous presence of stone and bone tools of the Archanthropus evolutionary stage, from the lower (750,000 years) to the upper (550,000 years) layers of sediment within the cave.
The research, after an interruption due to the dictatorship in Greece, continued up to 1983. It was then ordered by the government that all excavations at the site were forbidden to anyone, including the original archaeological team, and for 15 years nobody had access to the site or to the findings – no reason was provided by the government. Was this denial of access to prevent the extraction of whatever new scientific conclusions remained hidden within the incredible fossils embedded within the layers of the caves’ walls?
After the Anthropological Society of Greece took the case to the courts, 15 years later they were again allowed access to the cave. Since then the Ministry of Culture is trying in any way to overcome the Courts decision and further trials proceed.
Dr Poulianos’ findings contradicted conventional views regarding human evolution and his research was suppressed. Dr Poulianos and his wife were physically attacked and injured in their home in 2012 and the culprits were never found. He and his team have been denied further access to the cave to complete their research and study, and the whereabouts of the skull is now unknown.
Today a sign sits outside the cave of Petralona stating that the skull found in the cave was 300,000 years old, and on Wikipedia today you will see references dismissing the evidence and trying to date the Petralona skull within acceptable parameters – between 160,000 and 240,000 years old.
Recently, Professor C.G. Nicholas Mascie-Taylor of the University of Cambridge sent a letter to the Ministry of Culture in Greece saying that the correct date of the skull is 700,000 years old and not 300,000. He has also challenged the government’s suppression of information regarding this incredible discovery.
The Greek Ministry of Education, Religions, Culture and Sports,
Bouboulinas 20-22,
Athens 106 82,
Greece
5 September 2012
Dear Sir,
I am writing on behalf of the European Anthropological Association, which is the umbrella professional and academic association linking all of the national European biological anthropology and human biology societies, to express our concerns about the conservation of the Petralona Cave and Skull, the misinformation of the dating of the skull, as well as the treatment of personnel associated with the conservation of the Cave.
The bases of our concerns are that the skull has been damaged through many scratches and the crown of a tooth (1st molar) cut off. As requested by Anthropological Association of Greece what is required is a detailed description of the present status of the skull, so that no one in future can arbitrarily damage it further. There is also the problem of dating which has been scientifically dated at about 700,000 years ago not 300,000 as is given at the information desk. There is a very detailed record of the excavations and findings which need to receive further public presentation but which have never been catalogued so as to prevent specimens going missing.
It is very unfortunate that the Greek Archaeological Department stopped Dr Aris Poulianos from further work in the Cave without any explanation. It is also very worrying that Dr Poulianos and his wife were physically attacked and injured in their home earlier this year and the culprits have not been found. He was also verbally abused when attempting to give an invited presentation to teachers and school children.
Senior anthropologists and geologists have also been denied access to the Cave and the specimens for further study on a number of occasions without substantive reasons. Earlier this year there has also been misinformation given to the Greek Parliament concerning financial aspects of the Cave.
I look forward to receiving answers to these questions.
Yours faithfully
Professor C G N Mascie-Taylor MA, PhD, ScD (all Cambridge), FSB, FNAS (Hungary)
Professor of Human Population Biology and Health and President of the European Anthropological Association
The most important conclusion of Dr Poulianos' research regards the co-existence of all main anthropological types (African – Kobi, Asian – Beijing and European – Petralona) at the same almost period (700,000, 500,000 and 750,000 respectively). That means: the appearance of the today human main populations (races or even better phyllae - from the Greek language and that’s why polyphyletic etc) is tending to almost 1,000,000 m.y.a. and not to only 10,000 or 30,000 years as currently considered world wide.
However, independently if there is a scientific dispute on the above, it is only sad to become aware that research is not allowed to those who are not coordinated to the “standard” knowledge, risking even their lives in front of gun shooters.
Is this a cover up of an incredible discovery that the powers-that-be do not want us to have access to? You be the judge.
Update from editor 31 December, 2018: Dr Poulianos wrote to Ancient Origins to state that unfortunately the suppression of information regarding the Petralona skull has continued:
“Experiencing the above I am asserting that the prohibition of research regarding human history is due to the following (most obvious, i.e. not exposing political) reasons:
Various (Worldwide) Universities and their state allied forums have the power to influence all of the small range national institutions in order to achieve the aforementioned prohibition. In turn, this is most probably due to the fact that such research is allowed only to some “confidential” persons. Thus, re-righting chapters of human history is only their “right”. Whoever does not belong to such clubs and / or forums has to be stopped by all existing means, even by falsifying the truth against well documented evidence (i.e. without providing any scientific contradicting argument). Obviously I am asserting that knowledge is under control, especially what concerns human history. Therefore I agree with Lenie Reedijk’s description regarding the “Cover Up”, as well as the following comments to her article.”
By John Black
Related Links
The 40th Anniversary since the discovery of the Petralona Archanthropus' skull
The significance of the fossil hominid skull from Petralona, Greece
Related Videos



Comments
Quite right. I agree with the
Permalink
In reply to "They mark nothing but a by Hoog
Quite right. I agree with the language, but the jack-pot of the comment is the spirit it's written in. Humbleness is the key to everything. Helps us survive the territory, and rates the credit we ought to give to someone or demand for ourselves. Scientists (and not only scientists) live in a double world. The first one is their own community wherein they need to interact with respect for each other, and the second is the rest of the world whom they need to treat with responsibility. Apart from the fact that all people have the same rights (which is not yet a true case), not all people, we are the same. One is bright, the other is stupid, the next is lazy, the next one takes risks, the next is a leader and the next is a follower. Nevertheless, we all need to be informed with the true course of how things develop. Else, (which is the case for millenia already) history traps itself in vicious circles. Scientists, technicians, politicians, priests, etc; form cults in order to protect their winnings and the outcome is that the quality of the historic sperm remains the same, either we lived 20 centuries ago, or today, or I'm afraid, in the future to come. Sorry for the half empty glass of water, but if we don't point out and understand that the glass is indeed half empty, we won't be able to work on how to see it half full. Our potential is a given. We only need to use it right.
Cheers!
PS. The scematic puzzle we need to solve in order to publish the comment, is both fun and an insult. A person with special needs who apart from a clear mind doesn't possess a scematic perception, is automatically ruled out. The cults I was previously referring to. Anyways...
"They mark nothing but a
Permalink
In reply to Seeking the truth by redflaw (not verified)
"They mark nothing but a frontier." And what an excellent way of putting it! This is what science really is, right? Scientists are those who work on the frontiers. As soon as an assumption is broken, we all feel a little silly because that assumption may have been taken as fact. So there must be a balance between how scientists actually present findings not as facts but as possibilities, making somewhat sure that they recognise just how little it is that they know about their frontier. It reminds me of that quote by someone I don't remember and the words of which I'm probably completely skewing: there are three types of knowing for we humans. First is absolute knowing where we definitely know that something is a truth and can only be a truth. Second is the knowledge that we know that we don't know but that we know must be knowable. And the third is that there are things that we don't even know that we don't know. How many frontiers are out there? How much do we think we know as researchers/scientists and how much do we not even realise that we don't know? It's a tremendous act of humbling to know that for all of the games people play to become popular scientists, to be the One Carrying the Facts, they are almost the most prone to being proven wrong.
Seeking the truth
Permalink
The problem with scientists in most fields (anthropology, astronomy, etc) is that they consider their findings as originals and not frontiers. For instance, modern telescopes can ''see'' 15 billion light years deep in space. Thus, our universe is same large. They will never tell us that if we asked Mr. Hubble 100 years ago, he would reply that the universe is just 3 billion light years large, just because telescopes of that time could only pierce that far exactly. Same goes for human relics found anywhere on earth. They are nothing but the oldest ever found. They mark nothing but a frontier. A curtain, behind which we have no visibility. I'm fed up with the 90% of scientists who like artists seek popularity in their field just by imposing nonsense, half truth and eventualy lies. As Gregory House said; ''everybody lies''.
FORBIDDEN ARCHAEOLOGY
Permalink
In reply to There is one compelling by DarthAddonex (not verified)
THERE is a book mentioned above by Michael Cremo in which the author has a collection of other people findings which did not fit in the main stream science, and was not allowed to be seen or become so public. in the same field, there is another person Dona Klaus( Austrian) who shows evidence of human artifacts that are very old( millions of years).
There is one compelling
Permalink
There is one compelling reason to suspect purposeful suppression of Dr Poulianos' work; a 700000 or160000 year old skull with eurpopean characteristics, discovered in Europe was "allowed" to disappear from a University. How can anyone NOT think it's suspicious that a find (significant even if "only" 160000 y.o.) that had the level of interest that this one did, was "misplaced"? Sadly it seems that a lot of the "scientific community" these days is more interested in safe-guarding grants and lecture fees by suppressing contrary evidence, than finding the truth.
Pagination