All  

Welcome to the Ancient-Origins.net Forums. In order to avoid spam messages, we require all users of the forum to register first.

If you are not registered please click on the Register link from the top menu. If you are registered LOGIN here.

16 posts / 0 new
Last post
Ancient Civilisations Are Over 350,000 Years Old

Well, that's a controversial statement, isn't it? Mainstream science is not waiting for controversial theories or any other paradigm shift that endangers their institutions.

I come from a family of archaeologists and geologists, and what I have to tell is very controversial. My family possesses a display cabinet full of rare Sumerian tablets and cuneiform tablets. No one can read them. But my late grandfather could read them all, including the Sumerian tablets, as one of the few people in the world. I believe he guides me in his spirit, because I have no idea where my knowledge could come from otherwise.

Did you ever ask yourself where archaeologists base their conclusions upon?

Stone structures cannot be dated in any way. When they would date the stone, they find the formation age of the rock itself, and not when it was piled on top of eachother. Archaeologists conclude everything on excavations and finding in and around stone structures. Their interpretations are always indirect.

This it how classification in general works: we have stone age, bronze age and iron age. All these eras are classified into certain time frames. The stone age is everything beyond 5,000 years old, bronze age between 5,000 and 3,000, and iron age everything younger than 3,000 years. That's a rough classification. Archaeologists work with a much more subtle detailing.

When an archaeologist finds iron in or around an ancient temple, which (vaguely) can be related to the builders of a temple, the conclusion is that the age of the temple is younger than 3,000 years. And of course they use the C14 method to date the organic materials. But there appear to be an insuperable problem with C14 when the crust wasn’t as stable as assumed in the history.

So, our time framing of stone, bronze and iron dictates in fact everything else. This time framing however is completely irrational, and caused by the conditioning of the involved scientists.

Where is the statement based upon that Civilisations are over 350,000 years old? It's not that simple to explain. I've written two extensive articles on on this issue:
http://hubpages.com/education/Why-is-Greenland-Covered-in-Ice
http://hubpages.com/education/How-Old-Are-Pyramids-Around-the-World

I'm working on a book that will explain everything in detail. It's making deep connections between different events and disciplines, without making illogical jumps, which leads to inevitable conclusions that knocks you off your feet.

In short:
- We all know the sages about the great floods.
- We all know what science tells us about former ice ages. No one knows what caused it.
- Some of us know about the staggering alignment of ancient buildings. The alignment of about 200 locations reveal 4 former locations of the geo North pole.
- Ice ages show a temperature drop that is similar to the latitude shift of the crust. Showing that ice ages were no 'ice ages' but dislocations of the crust, causing huge floods, and wiping out ancient civilizations.
- C14 has become useless when the crust slips once in a while, since the biosphere changes completely.
- The oldest alignments are to find in Peru, Iran, Guatemala, Mexico, Russia and Ukraine, pointing out that they are 4 glacial cycles ago, which is more than 350,000 years.

To come to the conclusion that the oldest civilaztions are over 350,000 years old is not easy, and cannot be pressed into a few sentences. That’s why I started to write a book on this issue, that will explain everything in detail. The insights came in a split second, while I’m already months busy working them out in one conclusive consistent theory.

Ask a geologist the following questions:

1) why was the last ice age not centred around the current geographical North pole?

2) what caused the ice ages?

3) why is the Greenland ice sheet melting?

4) why aren’t Alaska, Canada and Russia not covered with a similar ice sheet?

5) why is the crust assumed to be stable while it floats on a magma layer?

6) why are the records of geomagnetic reversals (preserved in volcanic and sedimentary rock) exclusively interpreted as magnetic reversals? There’s no way to tell what actually reversed. The magnetic poles or the geographic poles. It’s therefore an irrational assumption.

What you’ll find is that there are as many explanations as there are geologists. That means that there’s no consistent overall theory. That consistent theory is now found.

       
Thank you for the articles, I

Thank you for the articles, I found them most interesting and captivating.

I have read your article on the age of the pyramids and have a few questions if you don't mind. The first line of questioning is based on what would the architects have used to orientate the layout of these pyramids. The great period or design was like a celebration of discovery and was about how the creative energy of our surrounding celestial order was recognised as a template for the life of the Earth and life on it. I would assume that the orientation was plotted and aligned with the stars, which would refer to a Northern Polaris, a point of which all the stars rotated around. Alternatively or in addition to the position of the sun. I also have some information that may assist with your studies and theories for your book.

I have been shown the natural process for the life-cycle of the planets, defining a basic and logical movement and process. This process will also coincide with your calculations and theories.

Great post

I would like to read those sumerian tablets you have in your family. They would be an interesting read!

Area 51 Aliens – Seeing Is Believing

http://www.area51aliens.org

wow, i never thought about

wow, i never thought about these things that way. do update us when you get more things live.

Trice

wow, i never thought about

wow, i never thought about these things that way. do update us when you get more things live.

Trice

…..Civilisations first

…..Civilisations first started 350,000 years ago

I agree….

I Discussed this early date seven years ago in the first edition of The Map That Talked.

This is deduced from the structure of The Babel Text” found on the Bilzingsleben Bone.

Dr. Derek Cunningham
Author: The Map that Talked and The Babel Texts

Sumerians

Please correct if I am mistaken, but I think it is generally accepted that Sumer was the first human civilisation. If so, I believe that insufficient discussion is made on the questions: 1. Before Sumer, was human society entirely hunter-gatherers: nomads with no knowledge of writing or technology? 2. If so, how long did human society remain in this primitive condition? Presumably a very long time? 3. If so, what occurred to transform this primitive society suddenly into a fully developed city state with knowledge of writing, history, accountancy, astronomy, architecture, etc.? The Sumerians say that all such knowledge was given to them by gods, correct? So how ELSE could they have acquired all the trappings of civilisation within few generations?

1234

Hi Alan,

Hi Alan,

Actually in China they were creating advanced water systems two hundred years before the Mesopotamia created their irrigation system, and there is sufficient evidence to now suggest there was a link between these two early civilisations.

The archaic text that the Chinese and the Sumerians/Mesopotamians used….. they are linked to earlier geoemtric patterns. A statistical study of the angular values confirms they are both linked to astronomy. 

Dr. Derek Cunningham
Author: The Map that Talked and The Babel Texts

Concerning the sudden jump in

Concerning the sudden jump in technology…..It wasn’t sudden. 

If the civilisation originally arose in China there is sufficient evidence to show that it took thousands of years to develop, and the original text is far older.

Dr. Derek Cunningham
Author: The Map that Talked and The Babel Texts

The Liangzhu water system

The Liangzhu water system predates the Mesopotamian system….

and there are numerous cultures on the Yellow River that predate the Liangzhu civilisation,

These cultures developed from earlier cultures, which employed The Babel Text (an stronomical text) to help navigate.

Dr. Derek Cunningham
Author: The Map that Talked and The Babel Texts

Evolution has indicated that

Evolution has indicated that life developed to a maximum size when dinosaurs roamed the planet. Since this time species have remained similar in dynamics although reductions in sizes have occurred. A theory on planetary motion or the correlation to the life-cycle of the World appears to be a logical explanation according to documents I have read. The reason I mention this is because it makes sense that the human form has also followed the same trend.

Sumerians

Thank you for your comments. The ruins of the Sumer cities are still there. Where are the ruins of the corresponding Chinese cities? If they have yet to be excavated, where is the written Chinese ‘creation’ mythology equivalent to the Anunnaki myth/history?  https://www.quora.com/How-could-the-ancient-China-and-the-Sumerian-civil...

1234

The Liangzhu water system

The Liangzhu water system predates the Mesopotamian system….

and there are numerous cultures on the Yellow River that predate the Liangzhu civilisation,

These cultures developed from earlier cultures, which employed The Babel Text (an stronomical text) to help navigate.

Dr. Derek Cunningham
Author: The Map that Talked and The Babel Texts

Sumerians

Thank you, Derek, for the info on the Liangzhu culture. Wiki dates it to 3400–2250 BCE, whereas it dates Sumer to 5300–4700 BCE. The science is far from settled, but the 2000 year difference may be significant –– especially when we consider that our own era is about that old. Nevertheless, in terms of evolution it remains a puzzle how Sumer arrived apparently equipped with all attributes of advanced civilisation in such an unprecedented manner. Also remarkable was their recorded account of how they achieved this by being given such attributes (and indeed their homo sapien abilities!) by ‘gods’ via genetic engineering. Darwin evolution is still looking for the ‘missing link’ in its theory of our development ––– so the Sumerian account currently makes more sense. 

1234

Intriguing….

Intriguing….

If they found a dam that is 7,800 years old, this would date the earliest irrigation project to a period that is far closer to the culture that made the stone circle at Gobekli Tepe, than the Uruk culture, which appeared thousands of years later.

So why isn’t the irrigation project linked to Turkey?

 

Dr. Derek Cunningham
Author: The Map that Talked and The Babel Texts

Legends are true. (perhaps)

Hello friends.

Greetings from vikings in Scandinavia .

I have a blog here:

http://ziggeman.tumblr.com

http://googleearthcommunity.proboards.com/thread/2468/famous-mythological-viking-grave-starkodder

 

best regards ziggeman