Elongated Skull in Paracas

Initial DNA analysis of Paracas elongated skull released – with incredible results

Paracas is a desert peninsula located within the Pisco Province in the Inca Region, on the south coast of Peru.  It is here were Peruvian archaeologist, Julio Tello, made an amazing discovery in 1928 – a massive and elaborate graveyard containing tombs filled with the remains of individuals with the largest elongated skulls found anywhere in the world. These have come to be known as the ‘ Paracas skulls ’. In total, Tello found more than 300 of these elongated skulls, which are believed to date back around 3,000 years. A DNA analysis has now been conducted on one of the skulls and expert Brien Foerster has released preliminary information regarding these enigmatic skulls.

It is well-known that most cases of skull elongation are the result of cranial deformation, head flattening, or head binding, in which the skull is intentionally deformed by applying force over a long period of time. It is usually achieved by binding the head between two pieces of wood, or binding in cloth. However, while cranial deformation changes the shape of the skull, it does not alter its volume, weight, or other features that are characteristic of a regular human skull.

The Paracas skulls, however, are different.  The cranial volume is up to 25 percent larger and 60 percent heavier than conventional human skulls, meaning they could not have been intentionally deformed through head binding/flattening. They also contain only one parietal plate, rather than two. The fact that the skulls’ features are not the result of cranial deformation means that the cause of the elongation is a mystery, and has been for decades. 

Artistic - Elongated Skull

An artist’s impression based on a Paracas skull. Photo credit: Marcia Moore / Ciamar Studio

Mr. Juan Navarro, owner and director of the local museum, called the Paracas History Museum, which houses a collection of 35 of the Paracas skulls, allowed the taking of samples from 5 of the skulls. The samples consisted of hair, including roots, a tooth, skull bone and skin, and this process was carefully documented via photos and video. Samples from three skulls were sent to the geneticist, although the geneticist was not given any information about what they came from until after the genetic testing, so as not to create any preconceived ideas.  

The results of a DNA analysis of one of the skulls are now back, and Brien Foerster, author of more than ten books and an authority on the ancient elongated headed people of South America, has just revealed the preliminary results of the analysis. He reports on the geneticist's findings:

It had mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA) with mutations unknown in any human, primate, or animal known so far. But a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample indicate that if these mutations will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans.

The implications are of course huge. “I am not sure it will even fit into the known evolutionary tree,” the geneticist wrote. He added that if the Paracas individuals were so biologically different, they would not have been able to interbreed with humans.

The result of this analysis is only phase one of many phases of analysis due to take place.  The next tests will involve having the initial test replicated, and conducted on other skulls, so that the results can be compared to see if there are any specific Paracas characteristics. We will update when more details emerge.

Watch the video interview with Brien Foerster revealing new details about the genetic analysis.

Featured Image: An elongated skull found in Paracas

By April Holloway


"Pretended" Darwin theory of evolution? "not proved"? "Especially those who claim to be "scientist" or Science addicted." - if you state these ideas, then why should i think positively of anything else you say, especially about science !? I find your nihilist statement very muddled and not well written. "Science addicted", indeed!!! Plus, science is always changing as new data is found, that's science - it is not dogmatic!

Ragnar Taltos's picture

"Plus, science is always changing as new data is found, that's science - it is not dogmatic!"

 The Powell Doctrine seems to refute the whole science being open and changing thing. 

“Under the Capitalist Sun, there is Nothing Sacred” Dr. Li-Chuan Chen

We are a self important species that has the temerity, hubris and based on fantastic ideas that there's a god or entity that "watches" over us and judges us. We believe that we are the only "intelligent" species in the Universe, a patently absurd notion. To infer that there's more to the Universe is to open oneself up to ridicule and attack from those locked into one opinion and afraid of ideas that don't fit with their beliefs. Because one doesn't believe, doesn't mean it's not true.

I find it very difiicult, and at the same time perplexing, that there exists such a total lack or disregard (ignorance?) of even the most basic understanding of gramar. And yet, I see it, more often then not from those professing a higher intellect. Nothing could be further from the truth! I am especially bothered that such gramatically inaccurate opinions are even allowed in a somewhat argumentive setting such as this site. If you do not have facts, if you do not know how to properly express yourself, then as it has often been said, “ let them think you a fool, tahn open your mouth and erase all doubt! “


If you are going to attack someone for grammatical errors, you may wish to cast an eye over your own post. Someone's linguistic eloquence, or lack thereof, is no reflection upon the validity of the idea they try to convey. Sheesh... Get me a pitchfork...there's agonna be aburnin
... Lols


Register to become part of our active community, get updates, receive a monthly newsletter, and enjoy the benefits and rewards of our member point system OR just post your comment below as a Guest.

Next article