The Cyrus Cylinder and the ancient proclamation of human rights
More than 2 millennia before the French Revolution introduced the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizens , an ancient Near Eastern monarch issued a charter that is considered to be the oldest known declarations of human rights. This charter is known today as the Cyrus Cylinder.
The Cyrus Cylinder was discovered in the ruins of Babylon, in modern Iraq, in March 1879. The ancient relic, which was a foundation deposit at the city’s main temple, the Ésagila, was made of baked clay, and measured 22.5 cm (8.85 in) in length. On the cylinder is an account detailing the conquest of Babylon in 539 B.C. by Persian king Cyrus the Great , the founder of the Achaemenid Empire, who had created the largest empire of the era. It also describes the capture of Nabonidus, the last king of Babylon. The account was inscribed in cuneiform text, and has been dated to between 539 and 530 B.C.
A painting of Cyrus the Great as he enters Babylon (Mani-Persepolis.nu).
The inscription on the cylinder speaks of Cyrus’ promotion of religious, racial, and linguistic freedom and his permission to those deported by the Babylonians to return to their homelands. It extols Cyrus as a benefactor of the citizens of Babylonia who improved their lives, and restored temples and cult sanctuaries across Mesopotamia and elsewhere in the region. Some segments of the text read:
“I announce that I will respect the traditions, customs and religions of the nations of my empire and never let any of my governors and subordinates look down on or insult them while I am alive. From now on…, I never let anyone oppress any others, and if it occurs, I will take his or her right back and penalize the oppressor.”
“I will never let anyone take possession of movable and landed properties of the others by force or without compensation. While I am alive, I prevent unpaid, forced labor. Today, I announce that everyone is free to choose a religion. People are free to live in all regions and take up a job provided that they never violate other’s rights.”
[Translation obtained from Gresham College, England ]
Cyrus Cylinder detail ( Creative Commons )
Some critics have argued that the belief that the Cyrus Cylinder is the world’s first charter of human rights is an anachronism, and ignores the context of the document. They claim that Cyrus seemed to be more concerned about the views of the gods, and merely took steps to appease them, rather than acting for the goodness of the people. For instance, it is written on the cylinder:
“the gods of the land of Sumer and Akkad which Nabonidus – to the fury of the lord of the gods – had brought into Shuanna, at the command of Marduk, the great lord, I returned them unharmed to their cells, in the sanctuaries that make them happy.”
In exchange, these gods were supposed to return the favor to Cyrus:
“May all the gods that I returned to their sanctuaries, every day before Bel and Nabu, ask for a long life for me, and mention my good deeds, and say to Marduk, my lord, this: “Cyrus, the king who fears you, and Cambyses his son, may they be the provisioners of our shrines until distant (?) days, and the population of Babylon call blessings on my kingship. I have enabled all the lands to live in peace.”
Furthermore, they argue, the fact that the Cylinder was discovered as a foundation deposit of the Ésagila suggests that Cyrus’ intended audience were the various gods of the realm, rather than mortal beings.
Regardless of which perspective is taken, the Cyrus Cylinder is undoubtedly an incredible piece of writing that brings to life the events that transpired over 2,500 years ago and opens a window into the thoughts and desires of a powerful king that once ruled over an empire.
Featured image: The Cyrus Cylinder . ( Creative Commons )
Lendering, J., 2006. Cyrus Cylinder. [Online]
Available at: http://www.livius.org/ct-cz/cyrus_I/cyrus_cylinder.html
Lendering, J., 2006. Cyrus Cylinder (2). [Online]
Available at: http://www.livius.org/ct-cz/cyrus_I/cyrus_cylinder2.html
Lendering, J., 2007. The Nabonidus Cylinder from Sippar. [Online]
Available at: http://www.livius.org/na-nd/nabonidus/cylinder.html
The British Museum, 2014. Cyrus Cylinder. [Online]
The British Museum, 2014. Translation of the Text on the Cyrus Cylinder. [Online]
Available at: http://www.britishmuseum.org/explore/highlights/articles/c/cyrus_cylinder_-_translation.aspx
The Paul J. Getty Museum, 2014. The Cyrus Cylinder and Ancient Persia: A New Beginning. [Online]
Available at: http://www.getty.edu/art/exhibitions/cyrus_cylinder/
Wikipedia, 2014. Cyrus Cylinder. [Online]
Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrus_Cylinder
The article uses a translation of the cylinder that I personally believe is not correct. I went to the link provided and quite frankly was surprised by the poor quality of the document used as a reference. First of all they claim that it is by Geoffrey Nice of Gresham College and yet his status as a knight and QC is not mentioned. Why? The document dates to after the time when both of these titles should have been used.
Another factor which strongly lead me to believe that the source is not to be taken seriously, if you ignore the horrible formatting that I’m sure a 400+ year old institution would have been able to do a better job of, is the presence of frequent spelling errors. I don’t think the document was even written by a native English speaker.
Lastly the fact that the very liberal wikipedia has a completely different translation which shows none of the human rights proclamations which so obviously serve a political agenda just goes to show that this document is questionable. Most books that are translated are vaguely similar but the paragraphs quoted in this article aren't at all similar to other translations of the original.
The writer, an archaeological student should have known to err on the side of caution.
The ancient middle easterners from the Sumerians on had beautiful scroll and stamp technology. this link has photos of some with the scroll stamp and examples of them rolled out onto flat clay.
I tried to give a link to photos of some, but a spam filter stopped it. Google sumerian scroll stamps images and you can see really beautiful ones.
The bible does not mention any different level of gods. In the bible, there is only one god recognised as being a living god and not a man-made entity. The ultimate, invisible creator God is the only god mentioned in the bible.
According to the bible, God has angels who speak to humans on his behalf when he stopped manifesting on Earth as per the story of the Fall of Man (Genesis 3).
As to the giants or nephilim, no they would not have been seen as demigods because again there is only one god. An angel or half angel would not be a god and the reason this is very clear is because in Judges 13:9-21, when an angel came to tell Samson’s parents that they would have a child the parents asked for the angel’s name so that when what he had said came true they could honour him, the angel refused to tell them so that the couldn’t mistakenly worship him.
As for aliens, God is an alien. He’s not from Earth it’s a simple as that. If you actually read the bible you can see that many things written several thousands of years ago are only now being proven by science, yet more proof that God is not a creation of man but vice versa thus making him again alien or an outsider of the Earth.
There’s literally no trick to it. Jews and Christians do not believe in multiple gods, idolatry or any of that stuff, that’s why unlike most other religions Jews (and Muslims whose scriptures borrow heavily from the Jews) do not make statutes or idols to worship, they just write, discuss and debate their laws and religion. Christians on the other hand were supposed to be like Messianic Jews but instead the religion has been polluted and Saints in Catholicism take the place of gods from polytheistic religions.
Jesus is not a completely separate entity from God. Jesus is supposed to be both part of God, a part made into a human to understand human suffering and motives and also continually linked to god. So for example if God was an AI in a massive computer and he downloaded some of his consciousness into an android body but the two were still linked wireless, that would be how Christians (by which I mean, me personally) interprets Jesus. The holy spirit aka the holy ghost is not a ghost in the way that people who watch tv comprehend it. Ghost is interchangeable with spirit and really means a sentient presence or energy. This is also a part of God, not separate from him.
There are no multiple or different levels of gods in the bible and therefore not in Judiasm or (true) Christianity. I’m saying this an a qualified archaeologist and also a Christian.
I think even the Bible mentions different levels of gods. Certainly other religions divide deities into different levels. Some being minor, earth bound, gods while others, more powerful, are said to dwell in other realms.
The giants which are said to be the offspring of human women and (fallen) angels would certainly be viewed as demigods in the eyes of humans.
Then there's the possibility of aliens who, if they did come down to interact with early humans, would have certainly been viewed as gods.
Ancient gods had physical representations that were subject to redicule, destruction or capture. The exiled Jewish answeer was the invention of the formless omnipresent god worshipped today.
The city of Percepolis had a similarly worded treasure; a 3 kg gold plate that's now in the Museum of Tehran. It survived the destruction of the city by Alexander and is thought to have been placed there by Darius as a foundation ideology to build their civilisation.