All  
2,000-Year-Old Carving and 16th Century Manuscript Reveal Some Maya Came from Across the Sea

2,000-Year-Old Carving and 16th Century Manuscript Reveal Some Maya Came from Across the Sea

Print

The Popol Vuh, a corpus of mythological and historical narratives according to the Quiché-Maya people, and Izapa Stela 5, a carved stela found at the ancient Mesoamerican site of Izapa in Mexico, provide a fascinating insight into Mexican history. In fact, together, they may reveal that some of the ancestors of the Quiché-Maya came from across the sea.

Popol Vuh Reveals Foreign Origins

In the English translation of the Popol Vuh, it reads: “We shall write about this now amid the preaching of God, in Christendom now. We shall bring it out because there is no longer a place to see it, a Council Book, a place to see “The Light That Came from Beside the Sea”, the account of “Our Place in the Shadows”, a place to see “The Dawn of Life” …… (Tedlock, 1992, p.63).

The Popol Vuh refers to their ancestors coming from the East, which is a significant statement.  East of the Maya would be the Gulf Region.

The Popol Vuh continues: “They didn’t know where they were going. They did this for a long time, when they were there in the grasslands: the black people, the white people, people of many faces, people of many languages, uncertain there at the edge of the sky” (Tedlock, 1992, pp.149-150).

An 18th century translation of the Popol Vuh

An 18th century translation of the Popol Vuh. ( Public Domain )

 

Izapa Stela 5 is Consistent with the Popol Vuh

Izapa-style art is characterized by upright stone stelae found at the site of Izapa, situated near Tapachula, Chiapas. Izapa is located on the Pacific coastal plain in an area known as Soconusco.

The Izapa stela no.5 is one of many carved stelae found at Izapa which date from roughly 300 BC to 50 BC. This monument has interesting iconographic representations that support some of the migration stories handed down from generation to generation by the Mexicans.

Night photography of stela 5 at Izapa ruins, Tapachula, Mexico.

Night photography of stela 5 at Izapa ruins, Tapachula, Mexico. ( CC by SA 3.0 )

The research of the New World Archaeological Foundation indicates that this site has been continuously occupied since 1500 BC. Much of what we know about the art from Izapa comes from the work of Virginia Smith's Izapa Relief Carving (1984), Garth Norman's Izapa Sculpture (1976) and Jacinto Quirarte's Izapan-Style Art (1973). Garth Norman of the New World Archaeological Foundation has published many of the stone stelae and altars found at Izapa and has discussed much of their probable religious significance.

Symbology of Stela 5

The stela no.5 records many glyphic elements common to other pre-classic artifacts including the jaguar, falling water, mountain, bird, dragon tree, serpent, and fish motifs. This stela also provides many elements that relate to Mexican and Maya traditions, as accurately analyzed by Norman (pages 165-236). Some ideological factors not fully discussed in regards to this stela are elements linked to the Olmec religion and the migration traditions of the Mexicans.

Ancient Migration Stories of Mexico

The Maya were not the first to occupy the Yucatan and Gulf regions of Mexico. It is evident from Maya traditions and the artifacts recovered from many ancient Mexican sites that a different race lived in the area before the Mayan speakers settled this region. The linguistic evidence suggests that a new linguistic group arrived in the Gulf region of Mexico at around 1200 BC.

M. Swadesh (1953) has presented evidence that at least 3,200 years ago, a non-Maya speaking group wedged itself between the Huastecs and the Maya.

Ruins at Izapa, Chiapas, Mexico.

Ruins at Izapa, Chiapas, Mexico. ( Eduardo Robles Pacheco / flickr )

Traditions mentioned by Bernardino Sahagun, a missionary priest who participated in the Catholic evangelization of Mexico, record Mexico’s settlement story. Sahagun says that these "Eastern settlers of Mexico landed at Panotha, on the Mexican Gulf. Here they remained for a time until they moved south in search of mountains”.

Friar Diego de Landa, in Yucatan Before and After the Conquest , wrote that "some old men of Yucatan say that they have heard from their ancestors that this country was peopled by a certain race who came from the East, whom God delivered by opening for them twelve roads through the sea" (p.28).

This tradition is most interesting because it probably refers to the twelve migrations to Mexico. This view is also supported by Stela 5 from Izapa. In Izapa Stela 5 we see a group of men on a boat riding the waves.

An illustration of Izapa Stela 5.

An illustration of Izapa Stela 5. ( CC by SA 3.0 )

It is clear that Stela No.5 is not only symbolic of the tree of life, it also supports the traditional accounts recorded by Friar Diego de Landa that people made twelve migrations to the New World. In the center of the boat on Stela No.5, we find a large tree. This tree has seven branches and twelve roots. The seven branches probably represent the seven major clans of the immigrants, while the twelve roots of the tree extending into the water from the boat probably signify the "twelve roads through the sea", mentioned by Friar Diego Landa.

This stela also supports the tradition recorded by the famous Maya historian Ixtlixochitl, that some people came to Mexico in "ships of barks " and landed at Potonchán, which they commenced to populate.

The Mexican migration accounts and the depictions on Izapa stela 5, probably relate to a segment of the ancient Mexicans who landed in boats in Panotha or Pantla (the Huasteca) and moved along the coast as far as Guatemala. This would correspond to the non-Maya speaking group detected by Morris Swadesh that separated the Maya and Huasteca speakers 2000 years ago.

Top image:   The Third creation of the Universe by Toniná Divine Lords, Garra of Jaguar (left) amd Kinich Baknal Chaal (right). National Museum of Anthropology, Mexico City. ( CC BY SA 4.0 )

By Dr. Clyde Winters

References:

Friar Diego de Landa, Yucatan Before and After the Conquest . Translated by William Gates (1937), http://store.doverpublications.com/0486236226.html

Garth Norman, Izapa Sculpture, 1976.

Jacinto Quorate, Izapan -Style Art , 1973.

Virginia Smith, Izapa Relief Carving, Studies in Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeology , No. 27, 1984.

Morris Swadesh. The Language of the Archaeological Haustecs. 1953.

Clyde Winters, Atlantis in Mexico: The Mande Discovery of America . https://www.amazon.com/Atlantis-Mexico-Mande-Discovery-America/dp/0615803636/

Clyde Winters, African Empires in Ancient America . https://www.amazon.com/African-Empires-Ancient-America-Winters/dp/0615796583/

Comments

Roberto Peron's picture

Good article and very interesting.  Question is how far from the East did the ancestors come?  I know it is no longer “acceptable” but the stone heads and depictions of the Olmec still look like Africans or Polynesians to me an not Mayan at all.  And how did these ancient Mayan ancestors know about black skinned people unless they’d seen them or encountered them.  We like to pretend everything is all figured out but, in fact, I think we have very little figured out at all.

 

BTW, the stele most certainly does depict a chinampa. Unlike yourself I have actually stood upon chinampas and I am quite familiar with their appearance and construction.

Clyde Winters's picture

The paper you cite is related to the 24ky old Bluefish Caves site. This site has nothing to do with the research detailing earlier habitation sites in the Americas that predate the Bluefish Cave site. Moreover, don’t forget the Bluefish Cave site supports the “Beringian standstill hypothesis”. The  “Beringian standstill hypothesis”, is the theory that people from Siberia remained in Beringa until the ice melted so they could migrate into North America after the ice melted.

 

As I reported in my Ancient Origins article: “Did Paleoamericans Reach South America First?”, http://www.ancient-origins.net/opinion-guest-authors/did-paleoamericans-reach-south-america-first-006592     there are archaeological sites  inhabited by anatomically modern humans that date back 45-100kya. Due to the Ice blocking passage by Sea  from Asia and Europe, and the Beringa land bridge these people could not have entered the Americas via Siberia.

 

This post is further evidence you are trolling my articles. First of all, this article is not a theoretical paper. This article is about Mayan traditions that they came from the East.

In this article I reported the Mayan traditions and provided on-line sources where the readers can find the Popol Vuh and Landa’s work. You don’t have to find your copy of the Popol Vuh, I provided a site where you can read the pdf version of the book.

POPOL VUH: THE MAYAN BOOK OF THE DAWN OF LIFE , translated by Dennis Tedlock with commentary based on the ancient  knowledge of the modern Quiche Maya. http://www.holybooks.com/wp-content/uploads/POPOL-VUH-THE-MAYAN-BOOK-OF-THE-DAWN-OF-LIFE-translated-by-Dennis-Tedlock.pdf

Friar Diego de Landa, Yucatan Before and After the Conquest. Translated by William Gates (1937) http://sacred-texts.com/nam/maya/ybac/ybac09.htm

Disagreeing with me does make you a troll because I discussed Mayan traditions that they came from the East. I did not hypothesize where in the East the Maya claim their ancestors came from that landed in the  Gulf of Mexico.  As a result, I am not talking about a theory—I am only relaying the facts.

Stop implying that I fail to understand what science is. I taught Research Methods at University for 11 years.  Moreover, I have published many peer reviewed articles. Some of them are listed  at the NCBI site   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/?term=Clyde+Winters

Granted I have never published an article in PLOS (only comments about PLOS articles published at the PLOS site) . I don’t mind paying a few hundred dollars cost of publication for a peer reviewed article, but I refuse to pay $2500 in publication cost for a PLOS article, when I can pay thousands of dollars less to have my work published in a peer reviewed on-line journal elsewhere.

Clyde, Disagreeing with you does not make me a troll and accusing someone of lying does not make you truthful or them liars. Talk all you want but repeating your opinion does not make it truth. I first read the Popol Vuh about 45 years ago and have read it several times since then but, as I said, it's been a long time so, I'll have to reread it. Now, I may be in error but, I believe the East they are referring to is Xibalba, the realm of Gods and Demons which was represented by the void of stars seen in the Milky Way as it rises in the East. Not Africa. Not Europe. I'll dig out my copy and reread it this coming week. What does bear repeating however, is the incontrovertible FACT that all Native American peoples, past and present, share a common ancestry and are genetically more closely related to each other than to any other people on Earth. I will also add that they, as a group, are most closely related to the people of extreme Northeastern Siberia and share both a genetic and cultural heritage with them going back at least 20,000 years.
The following article is based upon what we call SCIENCE and relies upon FACTS to draw its conclusions rather than cherry picking "alternative facts" to support a preconceived conclusion. Feel free to read it and submit a peer review detailing your "interesting" theories and see how long you last.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0169486

Clyde Winters's picture

Willy stop lying, you have never read the  Popol Vuh. The image on the stela is of a boat, not a Chinampa.  

I already posted the site where you can read the Popol Vuh in this comments section.Below are the statements in the Popol Vuh that claim they came from the East. If you had read the comments section before you lied, you would know this and not look foolish making claims that are not supported by the actual text.. As a result, your comments appear to suggest you are trolling my articles to spread negativity. 

POPOL VUH: THE MAYAN BOOK OF THE DAWN OF LIFE , translated by Dennis Tedlock with commentary based on the ancient  knowledge of the modern Quiche Maya. http://www.holybooks.com/wp-content/uploads/POPOL-VUH-THE-MAYAN-BOOK-OF-THE-DAWN-OF-LIFE-translated-by-Dennis-Tedlock.pdf

 

 

 

“The lords of Quiche consulted their book when they sat in council, and their name for it was Popol Vuh or "Council Book." Because this book contained an account of how the forefathers of their own lordly lineages had exiled themselves from a faraway city called Tulan, they sometimes described it as "the writings about Tulan." Because a later generation of lords had obtained the book by going on a pilgrimage that took them across water on a causeway, they titled it<b> "The Light That Came from Across the Sea." </b>And because the book told of events that happened before the first sunrise and of a time when the forefathers hid themselves and the stones that contained the spirit familiars of their gods in forests, they also titled it "Our Place in the Shadows."

 

“AND THIS IS OUR ROOT, WE WHO ARE THE QUICHE PEOPLE. And there came to be a crowd of penitents and sacrificers.*(351) It wasn't only four who came into being then, but there were four mothers for us, the Quiche people. There were different names for each of the peoples when they multiplied, there in the east. Their names became numerous: Sovereign Oloman, Cohah, Quenech Ahau, as the names of the people who were there in the east are spoken. They multiplied, and it is known that the Tams and Ilocs began then.<b> They came from the same place, there in the east.</b>” (p.87).

“There was nothing they could offer for sustenance, but even so they lifted their faces to the sky. They didn't know where they were going. They did this for a long time, when they were there in the grasslands: black people, white people, people of many faces, people of many languages, uncertain, there at the edge of the sky. “(p.88)

“Such was the disappearance and loss of Jaguar Quitze, Jaguar Night,<b> Mahucutah, and True Jaguar, the first people to come across the sea, from the east.</b> They came here in ancient times. When they died they were already old. They had a reputation for penitence and  sacrifice.”(p.107)

 

“AND THEN THEY REMEMBERED WHAT HAD BEEN SAID ABOUT THE EAST. This is when they remembered the instructions of their fathers. The ancient things received from their fathers were not lost. The tribes gave them their wives, becoming their fathers-in-law as they took wives. And there were three of them who said, as they were about to go away<b>: "We are going to the east, where our fathers came from,"</b> they said, then they followed their road. The three of them were representative sons: Cocaib was the name of the son of Jaguar Quitze who represented all the Cauecs.*(447) Coacutec was the name of the son of Jaguar Night who served as the sole representative of the Greathouses. Coahau was the name of the only son of Mahucutah, representing the Lord Quiches. So these are the names of those who went across the sea. There were only three who went, but they had skill and knowledge. Their being was not quite that of mere humans. They advised all their brothers, elder and younger, who were left behind. They were glad to go: "We're not dying. We're coming back," they said when they went, yet it was these same three who went clear across the sea. And then they arrived in the east; they went there to receive lordship. Next comes the name of the lord with dominion over those of the east, where they arrived.”(p.107)

Willy, The Popol Vuh, can be read at the site above. Read the book and stop lying.

Pages

Next article