Mark Laplume’s reconstructions

The Story Of Elongated Skulls And The Denied History Of Ancient People: An Interview With Mark Laplume

(Read the article on one page)

The verbal portrayal of "binding" is a collective projection. The reality is that 99% of those who speak about it have never examined an elongated skull first-hand. I don't know how it's so prevalent except that it's repeated all the time. The usual approach to elongated skulls is dominated by concepts, but the skulls’ shapes are not linguistic, they are morphologic. My work has been an attempt at making a soft rebuttal by making public my process of looking-and-drawing, which involves  seeing.

I don’t rely on classical authorities. In my work, the skulls are doing the talking. Talking is a projection, while seeing is receiving. And no one can answer questions which you alone can actually experience at the level of seeing. This is why my approach to elongated skulls is not conditioned by the dogma “elongated = deformed”.

Mark Laplume interpretation of Detmold Child

Left: Mark Laplume’s interpretation of ‘Detmold Child’. Right: Detmold Child on display (public domain)

IG: Are there any significant skulls that leave no doubt the 'artificial deformation' paradigm is wrong? How are these skulls different? Are there differences among elongated skulls themselves? Is it possible to group them according to shape and other features?

To your first question - take a look at these skulls exhibited at the Ica Museum in Peru.

Elongated skulls from the Ica Museum in Peru

Elongated skulls from the Ica Museum in Peru

There are problems with the official story, which dates back to Hippocrates, defining Huns as having been bound. It claims that all skulls are merely artificially modified skulls of the modern looking humans. The fact is, many had larger eyes as well as a 25% larger brain case than modern humans. Also, they had higher ears, up to ½ an inch higher than normal.

Paracas skulls (left) and modern human skulls (right)

Paracas skulls (left) and modern human skulls (right)

Cranial sutures are different. There are mysterious holes at the back of the skull. An extra plate above the Occipital, known as the “Inca bone”...

The Paracas skulls have variations in the occipital bone compared to modern-day human skulls

The Paracas skulls have variations in the occipital bone compared to modern-day human skulls. Images by Lainie Liberti

There is a problem with infants too, which have been found in Peru and the Andes with a tooth-set of a three year old modern human child. Most parents will know that molar teeth in an infant sized toddler is unheard of.

Infant skull from Cusco, Peru, and Infant/Child skull from Tiwanaku, Bolivia

Infant skull from Cusco, Peru, and Infant/Child skull from Tiwanaku, Bolivia

In South America, there are different categories or types. It does seem so, but I don’t get into (Spanish) terminology. For me, it’s just another way to separate from seeing the skull’s individual characteristics. I tend to say that “they had range”, like the unexplained red head that appears randomly in a family line. Similarly, the Elongated, the Huns... were wild in this way. They had a greater range, it seems, of morphological expression.

Image illustrating one of the "types" of elongated skulls

Image illustrating one of the "types" of elongated skulls

In terms of the connections between the Americas and Eurasia, elongated skulls from these areas are so similar that sometimes the only way to distinguish them from one another is by the background, or patina, on the skulls.

IG: Are you relying on any anthropological or forensic methods of facial reconstruction? Or more generally – how do you visualize the appearance of these people?

Organs come together to form the overall “body” of a head. Drawing the same skull from different directions tends to smooth out mistakes. The form arises in unison with the elements of bone, muscle and skin. Mainly, bones define much of a person’s face, so accuracy, we would hope, is inevitable.

IG: How do you fund your research? What are your future plans?

There’s a definite need for funding. When and if funding becomes available, it will greatly facilitate research and presentation of elongated skulls and it would increase our understanding of the historical significance of these people.

This has been somewhat of a slow awakening, but I think my drawings have gotten better. They were not good at all at first, although they were  something at a time when we had almost nothing at all to look at.

My drawing work continues. Now I hope to gain research access to the archives of museums in Boston, Philadelphia and Chicago. To look at skulls from Peru firsthand and, hopefully, photograph their collections of Peruvian skulls. I am also working to produce a book of illustrations, presenting images of skulls and reconstruction drawings. In order to get a more definite understanding, studies done in Eastern Europe as well as the Andean region will be required.

IG: Thank you for sharing your story and your work.  We look forward to seeing more of them on  RootRaceResearch and hope to continue our conversation soon.


"There are also about one thousand skulls in Romania, Bulgaria, Ukraine and Chile which are not yet accessible to the public." wow. When I saw elongated skulled people in ancient egyptian wall painting at metropolitan museum, that made me think about it too.

Tae a look at the infants skull. The Detmold child.

It would take years and years of binding to achieve that shape.

So, on first sight without going deeper into the cranial suture stuff,  I would think it impossible that binding can elongate this skull in only 1 or 2 years.

My niece was born with a slighly bulging head. The doctors told her mother to bind her head. Of course she didn't use planks to bind, but she did it pretty tight. After years the bulge was still there, only very slighly flattened

Sunny Young

Obviously, there was another species or sub-species of human concurrent to homo sapiens sapiens. (It's only been very, very recently that there has only been one species of human existing at a time on Earth.)

But why did they just kinda sorta fizzle out while sapiens sapiens continued on (so far)?

And why did they exist in a lifestyle of what amounts to just primitive junk? With their extra brain mass, they certainly could have started to figure out how to invent various kinds of machinery and whatnot to make life easier for themselves.

Are they just examples that even if you have a higher intellect, you can still exist within a state of endless stagnation?

As far as homo sapiens sapiens existing in a state of stagnation, the san peoples of south Africa probably "win the prize". If their kids go to school, they can learn to read, write, and do 'rithmetic just like any other human kid. But yet, the san have managed to exist in a state of complete and utter stagnation for about 200,000 years. Even though they were fully capable of not doing so.

If the san are told what's really going on in the universe, they don't want to hear it as they already have their personal opinions. And who needs facts when you have personal opinions?

Were the Big Skull people wallowing in a pit of personal opinionitis like the san have been doing and as a result, went really nowhere as there isn't anything that causes stagnation more than personal opinionitis?

Ps. The san aren't "quaint museum exhibits". They're 100% people with all the rights and responsibilities/obligations that any other person has. If people don't caretake how the universe functions, then the caretaking just doesn't get done as there's no one else to do it. The non-sentient lifeforms certainly don't have the ability.

but the size of the brain has nothing to do with intelligence. There are many people with normal sized brains that do not have adequate neural pathways and are therefore not as intelligent as people who have brains of the same mass but more pathways. It's like how mass (the amount of space an object takes up) and weight (the measure of gravitational force on an object) get mixed up if you do not know the true definition.

I do apologize, but to say that any culture lives in "stagnation" because they do not change is completely incorrect and insensitive to other cultures. Do you believe that because we have many ever-changing technological advancements we are living "better" lives? I tend to disagree with that. Sometimes people are content with their own culture as is. Just as you believe your own way of life is best, so do others. It is really only now that we have so much globalization that we have grown insensitive to other ways of life. The Saan people live in a place where they do not need to communicate across vast distances, so of course they would not invent a telephone or any other form of communication tool, other than a language relevant to them. Does this mean they wallow in self pity or are less intelligent? I doubt it. Why invent things you do not need, especially when you are happy with the way you live your life? Isn't necessity the reason people invent things? The Pirahã people have actively opposed globalization and choose to live simple lives, free of past or future tenses (they only speak in the present), numbers, war... This does not make them any less intelligent, it is more to do with preserving their culture. They are content with their lives. I believe the ennui that you and so many of us feel is because our culture prides itself on consuming the newest and best. We feel like something is missing in our lives and project that on to others, rather than looking at the facts and accepting that other people enjoy their less complicated lives and have no desire to change.

There is one way to lay this story to rest and that is by a DNA analysis. If these are truly a previously unknown sub-species of Homo Sapiens Sapiens, or another species entirely, then the analysis will prove it.

Outside of that, I will still maintain that these are examples of artificially bound heads, despite their allegedly wide dispersion around the world. I will always be suspicious of evidence which can only be accessed by one or two researchers and not the wider scientific community. It reminds me too much of the recent flood of "Bigfoot" sightings around the world.


Register to become part of our active community, get updates, receive a monthly newsletter, and enjoy the benefits and rewards of our member point system OR just post your comment below as a Guest.

Myths & Legends

Our Mission

At Ancient Origins, we believe that one of the most important fields of knowledge we can pursue as human beings is our beginnings. And while some people may seem content with the story as it stands, our view is that there exists countless mysteries, scientific anomalies and surprising artifacts that have yet to be discovered and explained.

The goal of Ancient Origins is to highlight recent archaeological discoveries, peer-reviewed academic research and evidence, as well as offering alternative viewpoints and explanations of science, archaeology, mythology, religion and history around the globe.

We’re the only Pop Archaeology site combining scientific research with out-of-the-box perspectives.

By bringing together top experts and authors, this archaeology website explores lost civilizations, examines sacred writings, tours ancient places, investigates ancient discoveries and questions mysterious happenings. Our open community is dedicated to digging into the origins of our species on planet earth, and question wherever the discoveries might take us. We seek to retell the story of our beginnings. 

Ancient Image Galleries

View from the Castle Gate (Burgtor). (Public Domain)
Door surrounded by roots of Tetrameles nudiflora in the Khmer temple of Ta Phrom, Angkor temple complex, located today in Cambodia. (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Cable car in the Xihai (West Sea) Grand Canyon (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Next article