Deriv; The Sutton Letter, courtesy authors, and a human skull. Representational image only.

The Giants of Doddridge County: Burials of a Vanished Race – Part I

(Read the article on one page)

 (Author’s Note: This article contains reference to an anonymous source. Although we have a rule of not using anonymous sources in our published work, we have made an exception in this case, since we feel that the possibilities yielded by this investigation could be of some importance.)

In the summer of 1930, a series of newspaper articles appeared describing a most sensational discovery: a race of gigantic beings unearthed from two burial mounds in Doddridge County, West Virginia.

According to the Clarksburg Daily Exponent for June 15, 1930, in an article entitled Two Prehistoric Indian Mounds Found Near Morgansville ( by Bruce Horton), the mounds were located on the farm of Benjamin Zahn in Morgansville, 12 miles (19 kilometers) west of Salem. The article mentions that Professor Ernest Sutton of Salem University carried out excavations.

Burials of a Vanished Race

The article makes remarkable claims regarding the “now vanished race” found buried in the mounds:

“The particular tribe or race which inhabited this section of the state is believed to have been composed of individuals ranging from seven to nine feet in height…”

Of the two mounds, the Exponent article notes that one, being “six feet in height and nearly fifteen feet in diameter” (1.8 meters high and 4.5 meters diameter) contained a type of megalithic chamber “shaped from large, flat rocks”, which was “carefully and tightly packed with clay”. Within the chamber was one sitting burial, considered to be a chief.

The Exponent explains that the second mound was “ten feet high and about sixty feet in diameter” (three meters high and 18 meters diameter), featuring three burials, one of which was “a man of height, strength and power, measuring seven feet, six inches tall” (228.6 cm tall), buried near the center of the mound and “carefully covered by flat stones”. Another skeleton from the same mound is described as being “hermetically sealed in a case of clay”.

Another article, entitled Salem Professor Discovers Huge Skeletons in Mounds appeared in the Charleston Gazette for June 15, 1930. According to the Gazette, the mounds contained “what Prof. Ernest Sutton, head of the history department of Salem College, believes is valuable evidence of a race of giants who inhabited this section of West Virginia more than 1000 years ago.” Again four burials were mentioned from the two mounds, measurements “indicating they were from seven to nine feet tall” (2.1 to 2.7 meters tall). The burial sealed in clay is again mentioned, with a measurement given of “seven and a half feet tall”.

Artist’s representation of North American giant. Credit: Marcia K Moore / Ciamar Studio.

Artist’s representation of North American giant. Credit: Marcia K Moore / Ciamar Studio. Visit  http://www.marciakmoore.com/giants.html

The Smithsonian Acquisitions

In the spring of 2015, the authors undertook an investigation of these discoveries made long ago. To begin with, the press articles all mention that Sutton sent the artifacts from the Zahn Farm mounds to the Smithsonian Institution. In fact, the acquisitions records of the Smithsonian do note the donation of several artifacts from the “Zahn-Maxwell Mound”, including a stemmed point, slate gorget, and a sandstone disk. The disk itself is mentioned in the press articles, noted as featuring several engraved lines on one side. These three artifacts were manually assigned to Ernest Sutton and Oris Stutler in the acquisitions journal at the Smithsonian, with a date of donation of July 9, 1930.

These are without doubt artifacts from the mounds in question and the material can be viewed at the online Smithsonian Collections Search Center.

The Mounds

Sutton himself published a paper detailing the excavations of the mounds in the 10th volume of the West Virginia Archaeologist in 1958. According to Sutton, the two mounds, dubbed Do-1 and Do-2, were located on a steep hill 400 feet (122 meters) above the village of Morgansville.

Do-2 was the Zahn-Maxwell Mound, the actual dimensions of which were 10 feet in height and 75 feet in diameter (three meters high and 22.8 meters diameter). Sutton documents four extended burials, one of which was encased in a type of baked clay, as well as the presence of red and yellow ochre in some burials.

Map from the Sutton Report

Map from the Sutton Report, courtesy authors.

Sutton refers to Do-1 as the Zahn Mound, measured as 12 feet in diameter and three feet high (3.6 meters diameter and one meter high). The report offers extensive details regarding the burial in the stone chamber mentioned in the Newspapers:

Comments

Races of giant people are mentioned around the world in many cultures, including native American folklore and the Christian Bible. So much of the archeological discoveries seem to be suppressed and I have to wonder why.

Tsurugi's picture

Well, we can't have a few minor facts dislodging long-standing, well-respected theory, can we? That would just be silly. This is science, not anarchy!

(note: sarcasm)

It's obvious he got his measurements wrong. Sutton says in his letter that, in answer to their question about his measurements of the skeletons, he uses the formula that the "femur bone is approximately one third of the total length". The femur bone is 26.74% of the total length of a person's skeleton, it is a standard ratio across all ethnic types. There is no evidence of a cover up here - it's standard for Journals to only accept submissions in correct formats, and they were clearly asking for supporting evidence from him ie. the photographs and allowing him time to provide it. At any rate, the article seems never to have been published, probably due to these sorts of basic errors. "Professor" Sutton is a google phantom, and seems never to have had any articles published at all. If anyone has links to genuine articles or the report of 1958, these should be provided here.

While it is possible he did get his measurements wrong, then there would be no reason for him to later use the words giant skeleton numerous times when referring to what was taken from the mounds by others. Opportunity to correct subsequent reports of giants were never attempted by him? That is highly doubtful. Decades of excavating and he still cannot recognize an average femur Is that even plausible? To simply state he got it wrong would negate dozens of other references where he clearly states and alludes to very large femurs and giant skeletons. It is more likely to me that the reference (of 1/3) attributed to him is false, or fraudulent.

If he got the measurements wrong, and was under the impression the femur was 1/3rd the skeleton and his skeleton is 9ft, but the femur is actually ~26%, that implies either 6ft of skeleton, or a 3ft femur by the 'mistaken' calculations, and by the 'correct' one it means it's still a giant, either 7ft or much larger. This claim he flubbed his calculations does not make sense.

Register to become part of our active community, get updates, receive a monthly newsletter, and enjoy the benefits and rewards of our member point system OR just post your comment below as a Guest.

Related Ancient Origins Articles

Our Mission

Ancient Origins seeks to uncover, what we believe, is one of the most important pieces of knowledge we can acquire as human beings – our beginnings.

While many believe that we already hold such knowledge, our view is that there still exists a multitude of anomalies and mysteries in humanity's past that deserve further examination.

We therefore wish to foster an open community that is dedicated to investigating, understanding and explaining the origins of our species on planet earth. To this end, we aim to organize, support and even finance efforts in this direction.

Our aim is to move beyond theories and to present a thorough examination of current research and evidence and to offer alternative viewpoints and explanations to those currently held by mainstream science and archaeology.

Come with us on a journey to explore lost civilisations, sacred writings, ancient places, unexplained artefacts and scientific mysteries while we seek to reconstruct and retell the story of our beginnings.

Ancient Image Galleries

The Rock of Cashel in Ireland pictured in the Summer of 1986. (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Eilean Donan Castle (CC BY-SA 3.0)
 More details The vertical west face of the Bastier Tooth (a top next to Am Basteir) in the Cuillin, with Sgùrr nan Gillean in the background (CC BY-SA 2.0)
Next article