.

Artifacts found on or around Oak Island

More Evidence that Ancient Romans May Have Made It to Oak Island, Canada

(Read the article on one page)

By Tara MacIsaac , Epoch Times 

What appears to be an ancient Roman sword has been found off the East Coast of Canada, but it is just one of several indications that Romans may have been there around the 2nd century or earlier. That’s at least 800 years before the Vikings landed, which is currently believed to be the first contact between the Old World and the New World.

The sword was discovered off the coast of Oak Island, Nova Scotia, during investigations into local lore of treasure buried on the island, conducted as part of the immensely popular History Channel show, “The Curse of Oak Island.”

A map showing Oak Island, Nova Scotia, Canada.

A map showing Oak Island, Nova Scotia, Canada. (Norman Einstein/CC BY-SA)

J. Hutton Pulitzer worked as a consultant on the show for two seasons and he appeared in the show’s second season. His team began investigations on the island eight years before the History Channel arrived in 2013.

Pulitzer has given Epoch Times exclusive information about new discoveries on the island that, along with the sword, support his theory of a Roman presence.

Pulitzer is a well-known entrepreneur and prolific inventor. Many remember him as the host of the “NetTalkLive” TV show, an early Internet IPO titan, and the inventor of the CueCat (an idea that attracted major investors; it involved a device people could use to scan codes, similar to today’s QR-codes). His company famously went down in flames during the dot-com bubble burst, but Pulitzer’s patents live on today in 11.9 billion mobile devices.

A little over a decade ago, he turned his sights to his passion for lost history and, as an independent researcher and author, he has been working with experts in many fields, to investigate the mysteries of Oak Island.

His theory about an ancient Roman presence on the island has already met with some resistance, as it defies the currently accepted theory that the Vikings were the first Old World explorers to make it to the New World. He asks, however, that historians and archaeologists approach the evidence objectively, without a preconceived idea that the Romans did not make it to the New World.

J. Hutton Pulitzer.

J. Hutton Pulitzer. (Courtesy of J. Hutton Pulitzer/InvestigatingHistory.com)

The Oak Island sword’s authenticity has been verified by the best available tests, according to Pulitzer (Epoch Times was given access to the testing data).

The sword alone isn’t evidence however that the Romans were on Oak Island themselves. It is possible that someone only a few hundred years ago was sailing near the island and had in his possession this Roman antique. It may have been later explorers who left it there, not the Romans.

But other artifacts also found on-site provide a context that is difficult to dismiss, Pulitzer said.

Other artifacts his team has studied include a stone with an ancient language connected to the Roman Empire, burial mounds in the ancient Roman style, crossbow bolts reportedly confirmed by U.S. government labs to have come from ancient Iberia (encompassed by the Roman Empire), coins connected to the Roman Empire, and more.

The Sword

An X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer confirmed the metal composition of the sword matches that of Roman votive swords. XRF testing uses radiation to excite the atoms in the metal to see how the atoms vibrate. Researchers can thus detect which metals are present. Among the materials detected in the sword are zinc, copper, lead, tin, arsenic, gold, silver, and platinum.

These findings are consistent with ancient Roman metallurgy. Modern bronze uses silicon as the primary alloying element, but silicon is absent in the sword, Pulitzer said.

J. Hutton Pulitzer holding an XRF machine.

J. Hutton Pulitzer holding an XRF machine. (Courtesy of J. Hutton Pulitzer/InvestigatingHistory.org)

A few similar swords have been found in Europe. This model of sword has a depiction of Hercules on the hilt and it is believed to be a ceremonial sword given by Emperor Commodus to outstanding gladiators and warriors. The Museum of Naples made replicas of one of these swords in its collection, leading some to wonder whether the Oak Island weapon is a replica.

Though the replicas match the Oak Island sword in appearance, Pulitzer said the tests on its composition have 100 percent confirmed it is not a cast-iron replica. The sword also contains a lode stone that is oriented due north and could thus aid navigation, which is absent in the replicas.

History Channel producers obtained the sword from a local resident, which had been passed down in his family since the 1940s. It was originally found while illegally scalloping and it was pulled up in their rake. The family never told anybody about the discovery until the recent flurry of interest in Oak Island because, in addition to facing penalties for breaking the law, illegal scalloping is frowned upon and considered taboo in the small community.

Pages

Comments

None of what he has put forward so far is any actual proof of Romans setting foot in Canada as all are found out of context so it amounts to nothing more than hearsay also I struggle to see why anyone would believe him after he out and out lied about the Italian e-bay sword http://www.andywhiteanthropology.com/blog/dear-ms-simons-pulitzer-lied-t... and as for the supposed crossbow bolts http://www.oakislandcompendium.ca/blockhouse-blog/oak-island-sawmill-we-...

It was dated to the 1800's on the last show Jan 19th.

they show lied to you! wake the hell up

there has been only one person who has been proved to have lied throughout this who farce and that is Hutton

So then Bob Bell wheres your proof Hutton Pulizter lied. It's easy to cast stones bub or bubbette (since I can't assume who you really are). You have nothing! All you can do is babble on and on, because it doesn't fit within your doctored History. I've read Hutton's report, that has been vetted by many people far more accredited than you pretend to be. Keep your anger within your walls, and keep lying to the few who still listen to your rants. The person prior to me that replied to you did not deserve your dose of hatred.

The "sword" in question was deemed to have not been made NO earlier than 1880-1890 after extensive testing conducted by the Lagina Brothers and their partners. It was debunked to be a clam shell molded Brass cast made sword. It was tested at one of the local Universities in Canada. Please do your research before you post such claims offered by J. Hutton who also has another name. You can google that too. Watch the episode that came out last Tuesday, first part of the show was about the damn sword!!

The provenance on this item is beyond shaky. I don't believe it was even found in the waters off Oak Island. I believe it was a plant and that Pullitzer has put the final dagger (pun intended) in his ridiculous career by deliberately falsifying evidence and misleading the producers of the show. Reprehensible.

You post this article after it has been debunked on International television. That's pretty bad journalism right there.

You should quit.

Obviously the editor did not read the statement of the range of tests carried out by the university or that you say they have no experience of testing ancient marine artefacts yet you have faith in Hutton who has no experience in testing ancient artefacts. Also what about the 13 other swords that have surfaced which are not made of stone or iron either.(the e-bay sword was not made of stone or iron but copper or brass)

None of these supposed discoveries are relevant anyway as not one is found in context thus useless in proving anything.
It becomes glaring obvious that ancient-origins are involved with Pulitzer and that facts do not matter as long as you have a sensational story with the thin mask of being actual history and you keep him sweet

I have visited many museums in Europe with Roman artefacts and this sword is in a remarkable state of preservation considering its supposed age.

No conclusive proof - yet - either way.

I find it interesting. A short-lived (unprofitable?) sort of trading post/exploration base is not outside the possible, even if low in probability.

Register to become part of our active community, get updates, receive a monthly newsletter, and enjoy the benefits and rewards of our member point system OR just post your comment below as a Guest.

Our Mission

Ancient Origins seeks to uncover, what we believe, is one of the most important pieces of knowledge we can acquire as human beings – our beginnings.

While many believe that we already hold such knowledge, our view is that there still exists a multitude of anomalies and mysteries in humanity's past that deserve further examination.

We therefore wish to foster an open community that is dedicated to investigating, understanding and explaining the origins of our species on planet earth. To this end, we aim to organize, support and even finance efforts in this direction.

Our aim is to move beyond theories and to present a thorough examination of current research and evidence and to offer alternative viewpoints and explanations to those currently held by mainstream science and archaeology.

Come with us on a journey to explore lost civilisations, sacred writings, ancient places, unexplained artefacts and scientific mysteries while we seek to reconstruct and retell the story of our beginnings.

Ancient Image Galleries

Front side of main complex	(GFDL)
Tikal (Guatemala), temple 1, August 2006. (CC BY-SA 2.5)
Cádiz. (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Next article