The Blombos Rocks

The Blombos Rocks: are they Crude Imitations of an Original Australian artifact?

(Read the article on one page)

An extremely unusual engraved rock was found in 1990 by a woman named Ros when building a new brick home located within two kilometres of the enigmatic Bambara Hieroglyphs, located in Gosford, New South Wales, Australia. It was found one metre beneath the surface. Above and below and in every direction, the rocks near and far are sandstone and this rock is not part of the local assemblage, as it is neither sedimentary nor sandstone. Aware of its unique qualities, Ros showed the rock to various authorities. One geologist she contacted, although unwilling to step outside his own self-imposed ‘box,’ did feel that the rock was ironstone. Our resident geological advisor and ex-professor in geology, although limited by only having access to photographs, believed it was not ironstone but something even harder. Having held and viewed this rock close up, all we can add is that this stone is extremely hard with small compact grains and would require a chisel of considerable refinement and strength to cut into such a hard surface.

Bambara Hieroglyphs

Bambara Hieroglyphs (also known as the Gosford Glyphs and the Kariong Hieroglyphs)

Being either ironstone or something harder with dozens of fine deep incisions positioned a metre beneath the surface automatically rules out any post-Cook (1770 onwards) technology, and equally, any form of Aboriginal (‘Original’) rock, stick, and bone tool-kit. The problem Ros faced over the next twenty years wasn’t so much that the ‘experts’ she consulted queried its credentials alleging it to be fake or the outcome of natural processes. They openly acknowledged the markings were due to human hands and sophisticated technology, but everything about this artifact sat outside the realm of all accepted accounts of Original pre-history. This was evidence of tools of the highest refinement in application.  It was so much easier for those approached to walk away, maintain their current posting and thus remain financially solvent.

The Blombos Rocks, an Inferior Imitation?

When Ros first showed us the engraved rock she also presented us with two documents detailing similar finds in other parts of the globe. First up, Ros presented some photographs and commentary on the Blombos Rocks. Artistic merit aside, what was also evident was the softer grain of the Blombos Rocks, even though we are limited to a photograph, it seems clear that the Kariong/Bambara rock is much harder and that the deep incisions demand a tool with no less than an hardened iron blade. The problem being, according to all universities and school text books, until the British Invasion, no such tool was manufactured inside this continent, yet there sat the end product awaiting exposure one metre below the surface, and on its own rewrites large sections of Original pre-history.

Throughout our evolving education I maintained one concern, if the experts are indeed correct in observing that this rock is an import and foreign to the local geology, if ironstone cannot be found throughout the local tribal estates, its presence in Darkinooong Land is in open defiance to central tenets of Original cultural practises. Sacred sites and artifacts are special because they have a direct physical and intimate connection to that particular tribal estate, nowhere else is it acceptable. It shouldn’t be here.

My concerns were allayed when in discussion with Original Custodian, David Fitzgerald. He informed me that there are two small deposits of ironstone nearby protruding out of the sandstone at Umina Beach and Dalley’s Point. This made much more sense if the rock was sourced from either location, and during our next trip down, on-site comparisons will be made between the engraved rock and both ironstone deposits. What can be stated with certainty is the intricate designs and time given in creating this object necessitates the existence of an Original technology and sophistication that is so much the norm in this area, and many other locations across the country.    

What only accentuates the importance of this rock, irrespective of origin, and an unforgiveable reluctance of those who were shown then cowered, was another article Ros had found while researching. Discovered in China, was a “stunning 30,000-year-old engraved stone artifact,” which was not even half as big, of a less precise line, had one tenth the amount of engravings and barely scratched into the surface when comparing to what was in my hand. It may have been regarded as “stunning” in China, but in Australia with Ros’ rock acting as the standard bearer, it is underwhelming in comparison and barely rates a mention.

The 30,000-year-old engraved stone found in China

The 30,000-year-old engraved stone found in China. Credit: Chinese Science Bulletin


All over the world there is enough prove ( aside from the many destroyed by the meainstream archeology ) that our ancestors in fact were a very developed age if not more develpoed than we are. To aknowledge that we would be faced with 2 important reasons 1. we are not very special at all, 2. what happened that destroyed such a developed culture, and could it happen again. The testing done from the rocks of the Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun brought two set of same result by two different labs where it showes that the rocks used to build what is presumed a 30.000 Pyramid ( older that the Egyptian Pyramids yet unaccepted by the mainstreem ) were in fact artifiacial rocks made out of some sort of cement way way storneger then the stronhest cement we have today. In short we have been lied and are being lied by the mainstreem, they have destroyed more artifacts than they have published and the question is why ?

You clearly don't like conventional academic practice. There is a fine line between research, opinion and what the public will swallow.

Hello! I could have sworn I've been to your blog before
but after browsing through a few of the articles I realized it's new to me.
Regardless, I'm certainly happy I came across
it and I'll be bookmarking it and checking back frequently!

My blog post; [url=]ダウン ブランド[/url]

So from what i read, it could be ironstone but they're not sure??? I have a rock thats very very similar (without the carving) and im 95% sure its not ironstone....nooooo idea what it could be though. i cant seem to find anything like it except for this!

It's a hoax! Markings look too deep and light, so they look new.


Register to become part of our active community, get updates, receive a monthly newsletter, and enjoy the benefits and rewards of our member point system OR just post your comment below as a Guest.

Top New Stories

Myths & Legends

Human Origins

Photo of Zecharia Sitchin (left)(CC0)Akkadian cylinder seal dating to circa 2300 BC depicting the deities Inanna, Utu, and Enki, three members of the Anunnaki.(right)
In a previous 2-part article (1), the authors wrote about the faulty associations of the Sumerian deities known as the Anunnaki as they are portrayed in the books, television series, and other media, which promotes Ancient Astronaut Theory (hereafter “A.A.T.”).

Ancient Technology

Roman glass (not the legendary flexible glass). Landesmuseum Württemberg, Stuttgart.
Imagine a glass you can bend and then watch it return to its original form. A glass that you drop but it doesn’t break. Stories say that an ancient Roman glassmaker had the technology to create a flexible glass, ‘vitrium flexile’, but a certain emperor decided the invention should not be.


Hopewell mounds from the Mound City Group in Ohio. Representative image
During the Early Woodland Period (1000—200 BC), the Adena people constructed extensive burial mounds and earthworks throughout the Ohio Valley in Ohio, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Kentucky, and West Virginia. Many of the skeletal remains found in these mounds by early antiquarians and 20th-Century archaeologists were of powerfully-built individuals reaching between 6.5 and eight feet in height (198 cm – 244 cm).

Our Mission

At Ancient Origins, we believe that one of the most important fields of knowledge we can pursue as human beings is our beginnings. And while some people may seem content with the story as it stands, our view is that there exists countless mysteries, scientific anomalies and surprising artifacts that have yet to be discovered and explained.

The goal of Ancient Origins is to highlight recent archaeological discoveries, peer-reviewed academic research and evidence, as well as offering alternative viewpoints and explanations of science, archaeology, mythology, religion and history around the globe.

We’re the only Pop Archaeology site combining scientific research with out-of-the-box perspectives.

By bringing together top experts and authors, this archaeology website explores lost civilizations, examines sacred writings, tours ancient places, investigates ancient discoveries and questions mysterious happenings. Our open community is dedicated to digging into the origins of our species on planet earth, and question wherever the discoveries might take us. We seek to retell the story of our beginnings. 

Ancient Image Galleries

View from the Castle Gate (Burgtor). (Public Domain)
Door surrounded by roots of Tetrameles nudiflora in the Khmer temple of Ta Phrom, Angkor temple complex, located today in Cambodia. (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Cable car in the Xihai (West Sea) Grand Canyon (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Next article