The best on human origins 2013

What we discovered about ancient human origins this year… and what is still a mystery

This year, huge strides were made in unravelling some of the mysteries of our ancient ancestors. For example, in the first ever analysis of a virtually complete Neanderthal genome, scientists were able to prove that rampant interbreeding occurred between Humans, Neanderthals and other species, resulting in an incredibly complex family tree.  However, other studies revealed that there is so much more about our ancestry that we still don’t know, such as several studies pointing to the possibility of a completely unknown ancient human lineage.  Here is a snap shot of some of the most significant studies to be made in 2013 relating to our ancient human origins.

What was revealed about Inter-breeding and how it formed our family tree

It was long believed that Neanderthals became extinct before modern Humans even emerged.  However, this theory was later revised and it became accepted that Neanderthals and modern Humans had a cross-over of thousands of years, but never encountered each other. New evidence caused a revision yet again, this time saying that Neanderthals and modern Humans did indeed encounter each other but never interbred. And this year, in yet another shake-up of old theories, a number of studies have presented evidence that Humans and Neanderthals did interbreed and produce offspring.

In one of the most dramatic studies that have been seen in many years, scientists were able to extract DNA from a 50,000-year-old fossil that came from a Neanderthal woman found in a Siberian cave and piece together the Neanderthal genome to the same level of detail that has been achieved in modern day humans.  The results showed that ancient human species, including Neanderthals, Denisovans and Homo sapiens mated with each other, resulting in an incredibly complex family tree.  In fact, it was found that about 1.5 to 2.1 percent of the DNA of people with European ancestry can be traced to Neanderthals; proportions of Neanderthal DNA are higher among Asians and Native Americans, who also have small percentages of Denisovan DNA; six percent of the genome of Australian Aborigines and indigenous Papua New Guineans belong to the Denisovan species; and only 96 genes responsible for making proteins in cells are different between modern humans and Neanderthals.

This supports a unique finding made in a rock shelter in Lisbon, Portugal some years ago, in which archaeologists uncovered the bones of a four-year-old child, comprising the first complete Palaeolithic skeleton ever dug in Iberia. The significance of the discovery was that an analysis of the bones revealed that the child, who became known as ‘the Lapedo Child’, had the chin and lower arms of a human, but the jaw and build of a Neanderthal, suggesting that he was a hybrid, the result of interbreeding between the two species.

However, the study on the fossil found in the Siberian cave produced another totally unexpected finding – the Denisovans share up to 8 percent of their genome with a “super archaic” and totally unknown species that dates back around 1 million years.  It appears that the Denisovans bred with a mystery species from Asia – one that is neither human nor Neanderthal.  Traces of the unknown new genome were detected in two teeth and a finger bone of a Denisovan.  In fact, there have been several studies this year which have all pointed to the fact that there is unknown species in our family tree that is yet to be identified.

A mysterious unknown lineage

A landmark study this year revealed the oldest known human DNA ever to be found, dating back approximately 400,000 years – substantially older than the previous earliest human DNA from a 100,000-year-old Neanderthal.  It came from a hominin found in Sima de los Huesos, the “bone pit”, which is a cave site in Northern Spain. Initial analysis on the DNA revealed a complex and confusing interbreeding of species which took place in our ancient past.   The scientists were able to use novel techniques to extract the DNA and determined an almost complete mitochondrial genome sequence of a 400,000-year-old representative of the Homo genus. The researchers then compared the DNA with Neanderthals, Denisovans, and present-day humans, and found that the individual shared a common ancestor with the Denisovans, a relatively newfound relative of humans who are thought to have lived in the vast expanse from Siberia to Southeast Asia. This was unexpected since the skeletal remains carry Neanderthal-derived features. In addition, the fossil was uncovered in Europe and not eastern Asia where it was believed the Denisovans lived.  The investigators suggested that a currently unknown species brought Denisovan-like DNA into the Pit of Bones region, and possibly also to the Denisovans in Asia.

In yet another study pointing towards an unknown relative, an international team of scientists investigated the topic by examining the shape of a diverse range of dental fossils. Around 1,200 molars and premolars from 13 species or types of hominins (humans and human relatives and ancestors) were examined and results showed that none of the hominin species fit the expected profile of an ancestor of Neanderthals and modern humans.  The researchers also presented evidence that the lines that led to Neanderthals and modern humans diverged nearly 1 million years ago, and not 350,000 years ago as previous studies based on molecular evidence suggested.  It was found that none of the species that had been previously suggested as the last common ancestors of Neanderthals and Homo sapiens were a match, leading to the conclusion that another species existed that is yet to be discovered.

What we uncovered about our ancestors

Modern humans (Homo sapiens) are the only living member of the human lineage, Homo, which is thought to have arisen in Africa about 2 million years ago at the beginning of the Ice Age. But many other now-extinct human species were thought to once roam the planet, such as Homo habilis, Homo rudolfensis, Homo ergaster, and Homo erectus. However, in a dramatic discovery made this year, scientists have suggests that these early human ancestors many not have been multiple human species at all, but instead variants of a single species. The evidence comes from a skull found in Dmanisi, Georgia, the 5th skull to be discovered in the region. All the other skulls were found in the same location and date from the same time period (suggesting the same species), but looked quite different from each other.  Until now it was believed that different characteristics among the Homo fossils, including those from Homo habilis, Homo rudolfensis and Homo erectus, showed they were distinct, different species.  However, this research suggests the individuals belonged to the same species – according to the researchers, the differences between the Dmanisi fossils are no more pronounced than those between five modern humans.  If this is the case, researchers will be forced to rewrite the classification system for early human ancestors.

What we discovered about hobbits

In 2003, the remains of an early human species, Homo floresiensis, were discovered on the island of Flores in Indonesia and were dated to have lived between 95,000 and 17,000 years ago.  Nicknamed ‘hobbit’ for its small stature (approximately 3 feet 6 inches tall) and large feet, Homo floresiensis has been the subject of much debate and intense research to determine whether they represent a species distinct from modern humans, or whether the remains belonged to a modern human (Homo sapien) with a disorder such as microcephalia, a condition characterized by a small head, short stature and some mental retardation.  This year, research using 3D comparative analysis confirmed that the Hobbit was indeed a distinct Homo species, but looked more like ‘us’ than previously realised.

What we learned about Neanderthals

This year, researchers found evidence in a collapsed rock shelter in Italy that Neanderthals kept organised and tidy homes with separate spaces for preparing food, sleeping, making tools and socialising.  A new study also suggested that Neanderthals may have passed on their tool-making skills to modern humans.  Dutch scientists discovered 50,000-year-old tools made from deer ribs in south-west France, which were believed to signify the transmission of knowledge and skill from Neanderthals to modern humans, as they are similar to others found at sites occupied by early modern humans at a later stage.

In a recent study, researchers found evidence in a cave in France that Neanderthals intentionally buried their dead.  The individual had been carefully placed in a grave and great care had been taken to protect his body from scavengers.  Other studies revealed that Neanderthals were capable of a form of modern language and speech.

The discoveries add to growing evidence that Neanderthals, once viewed as dim-witted and primitive, had a high level of technological ability and had intelligence and culture that was in fact on par with modern humans.

Human Origins in the Americas

Scientists made an incredible discovery in a streambed in southern Uruguay – a set of 30,000-year-old fossilised animals which show distinctive marks left by human tools.  The immense significance of the discovery is that mainstream archaeology says that humans began arriving in the Americas between 13,000 and 15,000 years ago, and the Clovis people of North and Central America are generally considered the "first Americans."  But these results show that humans inhabited the Americas at least 15,000 years before previously thought.

In another finding, the DNA of a young boy found in eastern Siberia may hold the key to unravelling the mystery of where Native Americans originated.  The 24,000 year-old remains revealed two major surprises for anthropologists when they completed an analysis of his genome. The remains of the boy, aged 3 to 4 years old, were found buried at Mal’ta near Lake Baikal in eastern Siberia.  The team discovered that the boy’s DNA matched that of Western Europeans, showing that during the last Ice Age people from Europe reached much further east across Eurasia than previously believed. Incredulous at the results, they decided to test the DNA of an adult who died 17,000 years ago, found at a second Siberian grave site – they found the same markers of European origin.  The results indicated that Europeans occupied Siberia during the Last Glacial Maximum approximately 20,000 years ago. But that was not all. The results also showed that a quarter of the boy’s DNA matched that of living Native Americans.  Until now it was believed that Native Americans descended from East Asians in Siberia. Now it seems that they descended from a mixture of Western Europeans who had reached Siberia and the East Asian population. A European contribution to Native American ancestry could explain two longstanding mysteries about their origins. One is that many ancient Native American skulls, including that of the well-known Kennewick man, look very different from those of the present day population. Another is that one of the five mitochondrial DNA lineages found in Native Americans, the lineage known as X, also occurs in Europeans.

While huge progress is being made on a daily basis, scientists have a long way to go in resolving discrepancies in the fossil record.  The studies cited above have added amazing insights into our past but have also shown how much we still don’t know. Let’s see what 2014 will bring…

By April Holloway

Comments

Hi, 

There are many statements made in this article relating to genetic findings and studies.

Would it be possible to edit the piece to include references to the authors and origins of the claims made.

Without references and links, this piece becomes little more than hearsay, when in reality it may well be based on factual evidence.

Even more important is that the conclusions drawn from actual data might be wrong or biased by preconception.  By allowing the readers to access the original material, a far wider perspective can be taken.

aprilholloway's picture

Hello smithder, this article is a summary of news stories we released throughout the entire year, so we haven't repeated all the details that were in the original articles. Instead, we added hyperlinks throughout the story to the original news reports, which contain information about the journals that the research was published in.  

Hi April, please do not take my comment the wrong way, it was a request for information. It was certainly not a dig at your article, which I found to be an excellent compilation and very informative. I must also compliment you on the aesthetic layout. The bold orange highlights which turn out to be the links you have included, I took to be simply for reading impact (and very effective they are too).

The reason I was seeking more information is that I recently came across the work of Geneticist Eugene McCarthy. http://www.macroevolution.net/e-book-readers.html and this ties in amazingly well with the content of your article.

McCarthy debunks the Darwinian theory that evolution is driven by compounded micro change, a theory which is in direct odds with the fossil record which steadfastly shows that new lifeforms are formed very rapidly and remain essentially static until their eventual extinction. McCarthy has shown that it is hybridisation that drives the creation of new life forms, and in particular, cross species hybridisation as being responsible for the far less frequent formation of extremely divergent life forms.

But the most significant aspect to come out of McCarthy's shattering perspective, is that man, when our hybrid was first formed, was as intelligent (probably more so) than we are today... We are not evolving Darwinain style into a more intelligent species, we are simply using our innate intelligence to gain more knowledge. We arrogantly mistake our technological knowledge as intelligence, looking down on those peoples and tribes who do not share our knowledge as being unintelligent. This is blatantly not the case.

But of course, knowledge comes and goes with the growth and waning of societies. Our own scientific knowledge base is but a few hundred years old, and we could loose it with the turning of fortunes, returning to a basic survival state of hunter gatherer in another 'dark age'. However, we would retain our intelligence, and in time we would be able to develop a new knowledge base. A different knowledge from a different perspective.

It is rational to consider that the ancients, with their intelligence matching or exceeding ours created an advanced knowledge that allowed them to create the artifacts we today find so incomprehensible from our different knowledge perspective. By way of an example, the Inca had a technology based on thread. Even their accounting and record keeping was done with cordage (Quipu). But when the Spanish destroyed their society, their knowledge and technology were lost. Same intelligence, different knowledge and technology.

McCarthy's work has massive implications for the way we can now understand our world and the workings of our forefathers. But it has even greater implications on our working today, because an academic establishment built on a faulty premise has an inertia that will carry it into dispute with this new insight.

I would very much like to hear your thoughts on the McCarthy theory.

a very valid comment as many will believe only that which agrees with their preconceptions, never coming across the source of the data which the article/website is based. I find very annoying when unable to check whether I`m just reading some imagined fantasy or reproducible research

aprilholloway's picture

Hi Steve, 

Actually, you will not find a single article without a source.  If an article is a news report, then we provide a hyperlink to the original news website where we obtained the information.  If it is an article we have researched ourselves, there will be references at the end. 

With regards to this article you are referring to, it is a wrap up of stories we covered throughout the year, and again, we have provided hyperlinks to those articles where you will find the sources mentioned. 

April

The comment was not about this website far from it. But the plethora strange and loony site abounding on the net in general

THE CREATOR KALA AND HER THREE CHILDREN

In the beginning*
a great darkness covered all space and this darkness was silent and still.

Before the first sunrise, all was darkness. In it the earth was mute. There was no sound of wind. Nothing moved.

Long before the dawn of time, the earth was uninhabited. The surface of the earth was smooth and without feature.

The earth was flat and featureless, unbroken by any mountain range, river or major natural feature.

No hills, valleys or watercourses broke its surface, no trees covered its nakedness, no calls of birds punctuated its silence.

Nor was it inhabited by any living thing.

There was no light, no living creature, not even a blade of grass to disturb that dim, featureless immensity.

Suddenly, out of the darkness, came a great upheaval of rock and earth. The vast featureless face of the land moved and cracked as the land erupted with life and sound.

Then, during those far off times, out of the depths emerged an old blind woman, Mudungkala, clutching her three children, a son and two daughters to her breast.

Mudungkala, old and blind, rose out of the ground. She carried three infants in her arms: a boy and two girls.

The journey of life had begun.

She clasped in her arms three infants: two girls, Wuriupranala and Murupiangkala, and a boy, Purukupali.

Crawling on her hands and knees, Mudungkala, clutching her three children, a son and two daughters to her breast, began to travel northward in a wide arc.

The water that bubbled up in her track became Dundas Strait, the swift flowing channel that now separates the east coast of Melville Island from the mainland. Then she turned westward, forming the northern shores of Melville Island and making occasional journeys inland to create bays and rivers.

She had come to create the land of the Tiwis.

Carrying her three infant children clasped in her arms, two girls, Wuriupranala and Murupiangkala, and a boy, Purukupali she crawled along the land, in the process forming all the watercourses.

And so she continued, her track becoming the waterways of the land, until she reached her starting-point. On her last journey she created Clarence Strait, thus completely separating the land of the Tiwis from the original vast land.

When she had finished she disappeared. But before she left she decreed that the bare land she had created should be clothed with vegetation and populated with creatures so that her children whom she was leaving behind, and the generations to come, should have ample food and shelter.

No-one knows where she came from - nor, after she had finished the creation of the land of the Tiwis, to what place she went.

And so her two daughters and son established themselves in the new land. Purukupali visited the homes of the spirit-children and brought some of them back to his sisters, Wuriupranala and Murupiangkala, so that they could become mothers. Thus Mudungkala's family increased.

The creation of the peoples of the world had begun.

*Aboriginal,
translation, "In the beginning".

Ab meaning WATER
(source Assyrian Empire circa 690,000 years ago).

Egyptian Heiroglyphs represent the sound a;A with a petroglyph on the sandstone of a bird facing right.

WURIU RETURNS TO THE EAST

Wuriupranala, one of the two daughters of Mudungkala the Creator and thus one of the first women, was given the task of keeping alight a torch of blazing bark.

As the Sunwoman, she had to travel daily across the sky, the flames of her torch providing the world with light and heat.

Sun-woman is beautiful, washes herself in all her colours, morning and evening.

Each dawn she would commence her journey from the top of a mountain high in the east. Before she set out, she powdered her body with red ochre, the dust of which, flying into the air, reddened the clouds of early morning.

She carried her food in a palmleaf basket and her hair was decorated with a dingo-skin ornament.

At midday she made camp and, on a fire lit from her torch, cooked the food she had brought with her or had collected in the morning.

At last, in the evening, the Sun-woman would rest for a while on a mountain on the western horizon. Here she again powdered her body, creating the vivid sunsets.

Then she extinguished her torch and, having rested for a while beside the celestial lagoon, Kumpinulu, she began her return journey east along a path through the subterranean world, Ilara.

On her way back, she was guided only by the glow from her smouldering torch.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152495505579251&set=a.10150649...

Zuell's picture

How can Homo Sapiens transform from hunter-gather living in caves to building cities, creating laungage's and growing crops in the span of 10,000 yrs or so? I mean before 8,00 to 10,000 BC were were esentially cavemen then suddenly we  have this knowledge for all this intelligent behavior that should have took much much longer to develop and refine. We had help, we didnt do it alone. What type of assistance and where did it come from?

Zuell

Zuell, look at Gobekli Tepe in Turkey, it is at least 12000 years old and whoever made that was not living in a cave. Also the Bosnian pyramids are real and date to 38000 years old. Humans have always had the potential to me as advanced as were are now, but due to cataclysms they are blown back to the stone age over and over again - but evidence does exist to show progression isn't linear.

To me having read various authors, the bible etc. It has to be evident that the human race must have been influenced by external factors to have been able to achieve so may years ago. Perhaps the missing race that habeen found in our genes were in fact from an other world. We have so much to learn.

tedholden's picture

"rampant breeding between humans and Neanderthals"???

 

The reality of the situation:

http://cosmosincollision.com/forum/index.php?topic=57.0

http://cosmosincollision.com/forum/index.php?topic=61.0

 

 

Register to become part of our active community, get updates, receive a monthly newsletter, and enjoy the benefits and rewards of our member point system OR just post your comment below as a Guest.

Ancient Places

Piri Reis Map
On October 9, 1929, a German theologian named Gustav Adolf Deissmann was cataloguing items in the Topkapi Palace library in Istanbul when he happened across a curious parchment located among some...

Opinion

Mosaic depicting Alexander the Great fighting Darius III of Persia
Interpreted by many historians as proof of a vision for the unison of man, much of Alexander’s dealings in Persia have come to be attributed with a policy of racial fusion. Accordingly, echoed in...

Our Mission

Ancient Origins seeks to uncover, what we believe, is one of the most important pieces of knowledge we can acquire as human beings – our beginnings.

While many believe that we already hold such knowledge, our view is that there still exists a multitude of anomalies and mysteries in humanity's past that deserve further examination.

We therefore wish to foster an open community that is dedicated to investigating, understanding and explaining the origins of our species on planet earth. To this end, we aim to organize, support and even finance efforts in this direction.

Our aim is to move beyond theories and to present a thorough examination of current research and evidence and to offer alternative viewpoints and explanations to those currently held by mainstream science and archaeology.

Come with us on a journey to explore lost civilisations, sacred writings, ancient places, unexplained artefacts and scientific mysteries while we seek to reconstruct and retell the story of our beginnings.

Ancient Image Galleries

Vessel in the form of a man on a reed raft
Administrative tablet showing the early development of cuneiform writing
The Great Pyramids
Next article