Ancient Travels to the Americas or a Modern Forgery? Who Made the Bat Creek Inscription?

Ancient Travels to the Americas or a Modern Forgery? Who Made the Bat Creek Inscription?

(Read the article on one page)

Ancient Travelers to the Americas

Legends about ancient travelers to the Americas have not been accepted by conventional history. Apart from medieval Norse expeditions, Polynesians, Japanese, and other peoples supposedly reached the Americas before Columbus did. It has even been proposed that in ancient times the Phoenicians may have traveled to lands that were later called the “New World.” This civilization could have brought other Semitic cultures on their ships - a possible explanation for the inscription of the Bat Creek tablet.

Not all researchers are convinced on the antiquity of the Black Creek tablet. They claim that it could have been created by people in the 19th century. There are plenty of reasons behind this view as well. Some believe that it could have been related to the growing influence of Masons.

Apart from this, many theories related to the Bat Creek tablet suggest that it was meant to confirm theories about the origins of the early inhabitants of the Americas. Supporters of this hypothesis say that Europeans wanted to prove that the land colonized by them belonged to them in antiquity too. Faking evidence to support their ownership could be a possibility. Unfortunately, as long as the mound remains lost and no more evidence appears, it seems that the problem of the Bat Creek stone will remain unsolved.

By Natalia Klimczak

Top Image: A reflected light image of the controversial Bat Creek Stone. Source: Scott Wolter


The Bat Creek Stone by J. Huston McCulloch, available from:

The Bat Creek Stone. The inscription of a Judean fleeing the AD70 desolation found in Tennessee? Available from:

Stone inscription found in Tennessee proves that America was discovered 1, 500 years before Columbus, By Dr. Cyrus Gordon, USA, Roy Bongartz, USA, available from:

The Bat Creek stone revisited: a reply to Mainfort and Kwas in American Antiquity, by J. Huston McCulloch, available from:


Everything that doesn't fit within academias preconceived notions is automatically considered a forgery. Western institutions have agendas to sell to their students in order to keep the lies afloat. Most likely the first explorers to America were the Chinese on the West Coast, most notably California where there is a stone wall in the hills outside of San Francisco. On the East Coast Runes have been found in Minnesota, New Brunswick, Maine and New Hampshire, and elsewhere with Hooked X's that tell of Viking or Norse explorers landing here. We all know the lies peddled to Americans about Columbus, who NEVER landed on the Continental United States. He maybe got to Dominica or Cuba. But NEVER , EVER what is now the USA.

I don't think schools are maliciously avoiding the subject of non Europeans ever settling in North America.

American schools teach us that viking incursions into eastern Canada predate any European settlements. No one is whitewashing the important historical viking settlements that have been found in Newfoundland or New England.

If anything your comment may be slightly offensive to Native Americans for ignoring their arrival. Native Americans predate all other population arrivals, even the Chinese people you mention. And no American textbook that I know of ever denies Native Americans from already preexisting in North America. Yes, the eugenics that took place after the Europeans colonized North America was awful, but that's another topic entirely.

All this information is available in textbooks, so I don't quite understand your grievance.

Never mentioned The Indigenous People because they were/have been here for 10000+ years or longer. You misunderstood my comments. American universities slight them all the time and don't respect the Indigenous as a whole.

If you think thats a slight, thats on you. Americans tend to ignore the natives here, I see it all the time here in Arizona. America needs to correct the record and give those here before the Chinese or Vikings more respect. And remove Columbus day from the record.

Well,Jason the Realist, the United Stars did not exist in1492,America was named much later by another person, and no history book I have ever read or heard of suggest that Columbus and his band of sea pirates landed anywhere close to the northern American continent. He made the history books because he was the first person in a LITERATE AGE that made the journey across the Atlantic. He took the trip and talked himself up. It may be the Chinese, Phonecians, Irish priests or whomever non-native persons who first set foot upon this continent, but we have NO HARD PROOF, just a few possible clues and apcriphal legends. So you may not like Columbus, but he made history for a reason, reasons you would do well to brush up on........

So many different historical references being ignored. For example there are never any mentions or references to the historical accounts that have been shared by the indigenous peoples of Canada in any of this “Coming to North America”. 

New World discovery stops at the Canadian border and is not allowed to go any farther South. I have found some amazing accounts coming from North of the Border in my quest to prove historical Pre-Columbian trading routes by Sea around the North Pole via the Circumpolar Currents.

Take the Mystery of the ancient Copper Mines in Michigan near Lake Superior. When Henry Hudson first entered Hudson’s bay to start his Fur Trade he discovered that the Indigenous already had an ancient well established network of trade routes by Canoe and Portage from Lake Superior to the Arctic Ocean. WHY?

The explanation shared by the Indigenous stories were that these routes had been used for ages by their ancestors who traded Copper to the “Red Paint People" from the Sea. They apparently called them the Red Paint People because these people from the Sea had a Ritual of covering their Dead with Red Ocher before Burial.

Where in the World have we seen this before? The deception here would be the almost forced use of the Mercator Projection in all studies about the “Discovery of America” and the premise that all Early Man were "Hydrophobic". If one was to use a Polar Projection of the Arctic Sea the Earth becomes a whole lot smaller and the very viable early intercontinental travel by Sea becomes not quite such a huge challenge.


Register to become part of our active community, get updates, receive a monthly newsletter, and enjoy the benefits and rewards of our member point system OR just post your comment below as a Guest.

Myths & Legends

Our Mission

At Ancient Origins, we believe that one of the most important fields of knowledge we can pursue as human beings is our beginnings. And while some people may seem content with the story as it stands, our view is that there exists countless mysteries, scientific anomalies and surprising artifacts that have yet to be discovered and explained.

The goal of Ancient Origins is to highlight recent archaeological discoveries, peer-reviewed academic research and evidence, as well as offering alternative viewpoints and explanations of science, archaeology, mythology, religion and history around the globe.

We’re the only Pop Archaeology site combining scientific research with out-of-the-box perspectives.

By bringing together top experts and authors, this archaeology website explores lost civilizations, examines sacred writings, tours ancient places, investigates ancient discoveries and questions mysterious happenings. Our open community is dedicated to digging into the origins of our species on planet earth, and question wherever the discoveries might take us. We seek to retell the story of our beginnings. 

Ancient Image Galleries

View from the Castle Gate (Burgtor). (Public Domain)
Door surrounded by roots of Tetrameles nudiflora in the Khmer temple of Ta Phrom, Angkor temple complex, located today in Cambodia. (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Cable car in the Xihai (West Sea) Grand Canyon (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Next article