The famous Stonehenge monument in Wiltshire, England, as imagined in a 1:50 scale model made by landscape architect Sarah Ewbanks.

Architect presents radical new theory that Stonehenge was a two-storey, wooden feasting and performance hall

(Read the article on one page)

Could the prehistoric Stonehenge megaliths once have been the support for a wooden, two-storey roundhouse, a venue for feasting, speakers and musicians? That’s the theory of an English landscape architect who designed a small model of what she has in mind and is looking for money to build a 1:10 scale model of the structure.

Sarah Ewbank says the fact she is not an archaeologist has freed her from preconceived notions and allowed her to approach the matter in a fresh way.

Ms Ewbank told Ancient Origins via email about her vision of Stonehenge:

“I believe Stonehenge was a Bronze-age venue, a large oval hall encircled and overlooked by galleries. Interestingly the upper level was tiered, the height of different sections reflecting the different height trilithons.  Consider both hall and galleries filled, listening to a speaker, or maybe there was feasting on the galleries with dancing below, perhaps crowds gathered to listen to singing or musicians playing, or maybe ceremonies took place to welcome in the solstices. It all sounds rather splendid and certainly needed – there were no electronic gadgets then!

My view – such a splendid building deserved to be used often – so, much as the Albert Hall in London serves to accommodate every type of gathering, so I believe our Bronze-age ancestors used Stonehenge whenever such a venue was required. Our bronze-age ancestors were intelligent people with needs similar to ours today. Forget the furry loin cloth and ritual sacrifice stuff - it's wrong.”

She said she’s discussed her theories with other experts. Some of them agree with her interpretation of the building’s use, but others strongly disagree and argue for the traditional view.

The way the monument looks today.

The way the monument looks today .  Howard Ignatius/ Flickr

Ms. Ewbank speculates that the sides of the house were made of oak and the roof of thatching. Of course, it is highly unlikely wood or straw would survive the thousands of years of Stonehenge’s existence, so finding physical evidence for her theory—other than the layout of the stones themselves—is next to impossible.

In fact, she says on her website people have asked her if there is evidence of a roof. She points out that 500-year-old abbeys have roofs missing. “So don’t expect to find the timber structure lying around after 4,000 years,” she said.

“When you look at it the whole thing it fits absolutely perfectly,” she’s quoted as saying in SalisburyJournal. “I haven’t had to push one stone out of place. I have just taken all the standing stones and it all fits.”

Ms. Ewbank’s model without the roofing

Ms. Ewbank’s model without the roofing ( Photo copyright Sarah Ewbank )

She lists several reasons on her website for theorizing the monument was a roundhouse, including:

  • One of the stones is called the “lintel stone,” apparently for an important reason.
  • The blue-stones have grooves in them for structural purpose.
  • The trilithons are spaced just right to support four large trusses. The height difference between the trilithons allowed raising of the trusses.

Ms. Ewbanks writes on her blog:

To form the large trusses, only eight 15-baunt (16-metre) oak timbers with angled profile are required. Bronze-age oaks were very likely bigger and better than those available today. Apparently ship-building in past-times robbed the UK of the good-sized oaks! Before discounting this idea ask yourself, ‘If Bronze-age people are capable of quarrying, moving and shaping stones that weigh 20 to 50 tonnes, can they fell and oak and shape the timber to form a roof?’ The answer can only be yes.

She told SalisburyJournal:

“Archaeologists are very obsessed with dating and the meaning of it. I looked at it and thought it was a ruin, and that with my design skills I could work out what was there. In our climate back in the Bronze Age it still rained, and why would you move 75 large stones just so you could dance around twice a year? If you put a roof on it you can use it all year.”

And those ancient people apparently moved those stones quite a distance. Archaeologists announced in December 2015 that they found the exact holes in a rocky outcrop in Wales from where the bluestones found at Stonehenge originated, revealing that they were quarried 500 years before they were assembled into the famous stone circle that still stands today in Wiltshire, England. The dramatic discovery suggests that some of the stones making up the ancient monument was first erected as a structure in Wales and later dismantled, transported, and reassembled over 140 miles away in Salisbury Plain.

Computer rendering of the overall site of Stonehenge and surrounds.

Computer rendering of the overall site of Stonehenge and surrounds. Public Domain


"The exact purpose of Stonehenge is not known"  Interpretation:  The purpose of Stonehenge is not known. 

A restaurant? Sarah, you're pulling my leg, hey!



An interesting idea, would have been a helluva party-house!

Looking at the model though, wouldn’t the massive weight from all of that timber have pushed the stones outward in the outer circle (no buttresses)?

Just askin’.


It's possible, depending on how evenly the weight was distributed, that the sheer weight of the stones themselves would keep them in place. My knowledge on stonework is limited, but it seems to me like the dynamics of downward force employed to stabilise recycled-tyre-homes (aka Earthships, etc.), which I'm more familiar with, could just as easily be applied to structures using monoliths.

Just musing 'aloud'...
The only big difference I'm seeing is that tyre walls are more akin to cob or clay, where the weight distribution is enforced by solid walls. When you've got large spaces between like at Stonehenge, managing the weight may be trickier.

Assuming there were materials that have since rotted away, it's really tough to say for sure. For all we know, there could have been extra timber support poles inside at some point?

The mortice and tenon joints that hold the lintel henges would create a structural ring that would prevent splaying of the uprights. This technique can be seen in use today in large wooden round-house structures.
This is also a very good architectural indicator that there was a structure of significant weight on top of the stones.

Ms Ewbanks freely admits that she is not an Archaeologist, and is therefore free from their constraints. Well Ms Ewbanks, I am not an Architect, but I propose that houses and public buildings be built on white fluffy clouds, and not on Terra firma. I can do this, because I am not constrained by the diciplines of Architecture. It doesn't really teach us anything does it? although both of our respective ideas may be interesting.

This is a prime example of the type of rhetoric that the early Christian church used to stifle discovery. Narrowing your scope can only limit your understanding of the broader picture.

Considering their age, I'm sure The Stones could have been one of the first acts booked to play here.

A "radical new idea" that was probably taken directly from the Ducktales episode The Curse Of Castle McDuck https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xh_R9aJBdj0

Whoa... Not even close to being supported by actual evidence. Not a shred. If she did ANY research into her claim she would see there are many inconsistencies that cannot hold up.

Not a new theory at all. Geoff Carter has had that theory on his blog Theoretical Structural Archaeology for some time and has the engineering studies to prove it.

You are missing the point - the new article and construction was done by someone who is NOT an "archaeologist-trying-to-be-an-architect" but by a "freelance landscape consultant/garden designer, with degrees in Landscape Design and Horticulture" - therefore she comes at the issue with an entirely different perspective - and we all know that the problem with every field is that they cannot see 'the wood for the trees' !! EVERY expert has professional pride in his own field and generally resents anyone of another profession daring to conceive a radical new idea - this designer saw something that the archaeologists still were not seeing - she looked at the stones and saw the inner structure the other guy was not considering - his drawings only include the concept of the outer-outer ring of stones having roofing. I love her idea and see this as a new way to consider the site's use. Nothing wrong with this at all - what makes me laugh is the reaction of the 'experts' - so predictable - "no WE are the experts - mind your own business - we know what the truth is" - NO you are being proved wrong on every front - Archaeology is being determined by the free thinkers who come at the subject with an open mind ! The single biggest problem for Archaeology is the long-standing notion of ancient humans being sub-human dolts - we are seeing this demolished on every front and out history goes way further back than the professional crowd ever gave thought to - yippee !!!!

I heard the Stones played there ,once.

Barry Sears's picture

As above so below, our ancient ones plotted the connection to the Celestial creative energies. By dividing the World into 12 zones around the equator a connection is made to the 12 zones around the night sky. By observing the 12 zones around the Earth the creative energies around the zodiac are interpreted. Our ancient ones discovered the World changed to the pattern of the body and unique animals existed in different regions of the World expressing body parts. The World was explored and unique characteristics were recorded from each zone of the World which related to the full body of the World and the full body of the Celestial sky. From this zone the crab or Dorset crab was a distinctive regional animal that expressed the breast region. 
Stonehenge marks the zone of Cancer as part of the World anatomy as communicated through the ancient civilisations global community. The World was united as a complete body. The next zone of the World anatomy is Leo and this correlates to the Sphinx. The next is Virgo and Israel marks the zone of Virgo through Mr Christ and the Virgin Mary. The scales Buddha.......

Look at that roof! Gotta be a smurf dwelling! Sadly, also, the making of the small-scale model means that Ms Ewbanks' Jenga set is unlikely to ever work properly again.

As for music venue... the amount of effort that must have gone into shifting those huge stones would mean that the average Stone-Age pleb was about as likely to go there to enjoy a "rock" concert (sorry) as s/he would be to survive naked on Dartmoor in winter. If it was a meeting venue - an idea which is not actually without merit - only shamans and chief Smurfs would be likely to set their grubby soles down within its hallowed precincts, the latter only with permission of the former.

A conference centre for maintaining the peace between local tribes would be more my guess, with the very outer ring being a high wooden pale to keep the hoi-polloi firmly out.

I will agree that during the harvesting season there is definate reason to celebrate. I will also agree that the stones could support weight. I do agree that cone and pyramid style structures were popular during the Neolithic period and the Bronze age. I do believe that just like the pyramids the windows and carefully placed tiles or floor markers could have shown where the sun was on the solstices. This site proves my thoughts,   http://solar-center.stanford.edu/AO/Medicine-Wheels.pdf   …..   I believe this was an observatory. It is too bad that there is not much physical evidence.

Troy Mobley

Barry Sears's picture

Whats the storey with the right eye? The sign of Cancer has the front path ways as the feelers and historical photos show how the eye has changed and would have been opposite the other eye. Is there any history on it’s change?

Colin Berry's picture

“Our bronze-age ancestors were intelligent people with needs similar to ours today. Forget the furry loin cloth and ritual sacrifice stuff - it's wrong.”

But it wasn’t Bronze Age. Stonehenge is late Neolithic, still Stone Age, with copper just starting to make an appearance, but for pastoral folk at any rate, woven clothes, not fur.

Yes, they were intelligent folk, but still had practical problems that needed attending to, like how best to dispose of the dead. I have just posted my new updated theory, which views Stonehenge and other sites with standing stones as places for “sky burial”.


The upright stones, and especially level lintels of Stonehege, provided secure places on which scavenger birds – especially crows and seagulls – could perch, roost and maybe even nest. Reminder: sky burial is one of the available options that can be classified as ‘passive excarnation’ – defleshing of the dead. Simple burial would have been laborious and time-consuming on the chalk uplands of Wiltshire (deer antler picks only!) and cremation probably seen as a criminal waste of firewood, needed for cooking and keeping warm.


Colin Berry's picture

After some reflection, I’ve come to the conclusion that what's preventing appreciation of the true role of Stonehenge and other similar sites with standing stones, from Ireland to Korea, is terminology, probably the Americas too. Folk don’t like to hear about “sky burial”, much less excarnation. As for “ritual defleshing” one is simply asking for trouble…

Let’s change the terminology. Let’s refer to “skeletonization” stressing that it’s not so different from modern day cremation if one focuses on the end-product, a relatively inoffensive end product (sterile bones) and less on the means by which it was obtained…

Our Neolithic ancestors used appropriate technology, given it was an era of human history that lacked metal tools for digging graves or cutting firewood for funeral pyres… Let’s stop portraying them as primitives. Technologically backward maybe, but not primitives...








Register to become part of our active community, get updates, receive a monthly newsletter, and enjoy the benefits and rewards of our member point system OR just post your comment below as a Guest.

Myths & Legends

The Kusanagi: Unseen Legendary Japanese Sword
The Kusanagi-no-Tsurugi (translated as Grass-cutting Sword or Herb-quelling Sword ) is a legendary Japanese sword. This weapon, commonly referred to simply as The Kusanagi , is one of the three...

Our Mission

Ancient Origins seeks to uncover, what we believe, is one of the most important pieces of knowledge we can acquire as human beings – our beginnings.

While many believe that we already hold such knowledge, our view is that there still exists a multitude of anomalies and mysteries in humanity's past that deserve further examination.

We therefore wish to foster an open community that is dedicated to investigating, understanding and explaining the origins of our species on planet earth. To this end, we aim to organize, support and even finance efforts in this direction.

Our aim is to move beyond theories and to present a thorough examination of current research and evidence and to offer alternative viewpoints and explanations to those currently held by mainstream science and archaeology.

Come with us on a journey to explore lost civilisations, sacred writings, ancient places, unexplained artefacts and scientific mysteries while we seek to reconstruct and retell the story of our beginnings.

Ancient Image Galleries

Johnston Canyon, Banff NP Alberta Canada (CC BY 2.0)
The Castle and its Moat. (CC BY-SA 3.0 ro)
El Castillo dominates the center of the Chichen Itza archaeological site. (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Next article