Sunken city in Cuba

What Happened to the Sunken City of Cuba?

Just over a decade ago, a team of explorers were working on an exploration and survey mission off the western coast of Cuba when their sonar equipment picked up a perplexing series of stone structures lying some 650 metres below the surface.  The structures appeared completely analogous against the barren ‘desert’ of the ocean floor and seemed to show symmetrically organized stones reminiscent of an urban development. A media flurry soon ensued with news sites sporting headlines such as ‘Atlantis Discovered in Cuba’ and ‘Lost City of the Caribbean Found’. However, the finding also attracted the attention of the government, national museum, and national geographic, who all made promises to investigate the strange sonar images. Now, ten years on, the story has disappeared into obscurity. What ever happened to the sunken ‘ruins’ of Cuba? Were they ever fully investigated? And why has the media fallen silent on this unusual discovery?

The discovery was first made in 2001 when Pauline Zalitzki, a marine engineer, and her husband Paul Weinzweig, owners of a Canadian company called Advanced Digital Communications (ADC), were working on a survey mission in conjunction with the Cuban government off the tip of the Guanahacabibes Peninsula in the Pinar del Río Province of Cuba. ADC was one of four firms working in a joint venture with President Fidel Castro's government to explore Cuban waters, which hold hundreds of treasure-laden ships from the Spanish colonial era. The team was using advanced sonar equipment to scan a 2 square kilometre area of the sea floor when they noticed a series of symmetrical and geometric stone structures resembling an urban complex.

Map of the sunken city in Cuba

Map showing location of supposed ancient city discovered by Paul Weinzweig and Pauline Zalitzki. Image source.

Upon studying the sonar images, Zalitzki observed what appeared to be unusual formations of smooth blocks, crests, and geometric shapes. Some of the blocks looked like they were built in pyramid shapes, others were circular. 

In July 2001, they returned to the site with geologist Manuel Iturralde, senior researcher of Cuba's Natural History Museum, this time equipped with a Remotely Operated Vehicle to examine and film the structures. The images revealed large blocks of stone resembling hewn granite, measuring about 8 feet by 10 feet. Some blocks appeared deliberately stacked atop one another, others appeared isolated from the rest. Zalitzki said that the images appeared to reflect the ruins of a submerged city but was reluctant to draw any conclusions without further evidence.

“These are extremely peculiar structures, and they have captured our imagination,” said Iturralde, who has studied countless underwater formations. “But if I had to explain this geologically, I would have a hard time.”

Estimating that it would have taken 50,000 years for such structures to have sunken to the depth at which they were said to be found, Iturralde added "50,000 years ago there wasn't the architectural capacity in any of the cultures we know of to build complex buildings." A specialist in underwater archaeology at Florida State University added "It would be cool if they were right, but it would be real advanced for anything we would see in the New World for that time frame. The structures are out of time and out of place."

In the media storm that followed the announcement of the discovery, news sites were quick to draw parallels with the fabled lost city of Atlantis. However, Zelitsky and Weinzweig were unwilling to make such comparisons.  The story is myth, said Zelitsky. "What we have found is more likely remnants of a local culture," once located on a 100-mile "land bridge" that joined Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula with Cuba.  Iturralde added that there are local legends of the Maya and native Yucatecos that tell of an island inhabited by their ancestors that vanished beneath the waves. Nevertheless, Iturralde does not discount the possibility that the rock formations are merely the result of the wonders of Mother Nature. “Nature is able to create some really unimaginable structures,” he said.

Despite hundreds of media outlets reporting on sunken cities, advanced civilizations, the lost city of Atlantis, and submerged ruins, there are others who are not so willing to accept this point of view.  Keith Fitzpatrick-Matthews from the debunking website Bad Archaeology, claimed that the depth of the alleged remains are the biggest problem for the sunken city proponents. During the Pleistocene, which was characterised by a series of ice ages, sea levels dropped significantly, but the maximum drop was around 100 metres.

At no point during the Ice Age would it have been above sea level unless, of course, the land on which they stand has sunk. This is the claim made for Atlantis: according to Plato’s account, it was destroyed “by violent earthquakes and floods”. However, if we take Plato at his word – as we must if we assume Atlantis to have been an historical place – the violence of its sinking makes it improbable that an entire city could have survived plunging more than 600 m into an abyss,” writes Fitzpatrick-Matthews.

If we assume that he is right and that these stone structures do not reflect an ancient submerged city but are simply products of nature, then surely geologists and other scientists would be quick to jump on the finding and investigate what freakish event of nature caused such peculiar formations.  Strangely, however, there have been no reported follow-up investigations and news outlets have gone deathly silent on the matter. What happened to all the promises from the government, national museum, National Geographic, and other scientists to carry out further surveys?

The quick dismissal of the story has led some to question whether there has been a suppression of information regarding the finding. However, Fitzpatrick-Matthews claims the story simply went cold and that in the end experts were not convinced that Zelitsky had really discovered a sunken city.

Featured image: Reconstructed Image taken from the sonar scan of the sea floor off the coast of Cuba.

References:

Bauza, Vanessa (Oct 27, 2002). "Submerged Cuban Ruins May Be Manmade, Experts Say"Daily News, Bowling Green, Kentucky. Retrieved 3 October 2012.

Evans, Marcel (2012). ‘Lost city’ found beneath Cuban waters. Costa Rica Star

Fitzpatrick-Matthews, Keith. (2012) An underwater city west of Cuba, Bad Archaeology

Handwerk, Brian., New Underwater Finds Raise Questions About Flood Myths, National Geographic News, May 28, 2002.

Lost city' found beneath Cuban waters, BBC News, 7 December 2001.

By April Holloway

Comments

how much does it take to send an ROV down there? it cant have been that much that nobody in 13 years has gone to take a peek...

This underwater city has to be very old, far more than 50,000 years. Cuba, it the extreme ancient past was in the Pacific Ocean. The three pyramids seem to be closer together than in Giza. We suggest an examination of the position of the Orion belt in the ancient past to confirm the date.

We can not do this because we do not have access to more accurate data on both the sunken city and the ancient location of the stars in Orion. We think, however, that the date may be millions of years old. We have confirmed a date of just under 66 million years for the cities of Tulum and Chechen Itza in the Yucatan in Mexico.

Who is this "we" you speak of? Just curious because Tulum is less than a thousand years old being occupied only as early as 1200 AD and Chechen Itza is less than 2000 years old being first occupied around 600 AD. 66 million years old, really?

Although I agree that 66 million years does seem a bit extreme, I just can't believe that Chichen Itza is less than 2000 years old.
I recently visited and was shocked to hear from our guide that it wasn't considered to be older.
Apparently Chichen Itza began to flourish and gained importance in the region around 600 AD, so my guess is that it was constructed many many years before that.
The same goes for the pyramids and sphinx in Egypt, these monuments are so much older than anyone would like to admit.
I just don't get why this information is being deliberately held from us? There is obviously a damaging truth to the system that's being hidden from us mere mortals.

I would like to submit an article. How many words do you accept as a feature story and who should I submit it to? It is on the topic of our Star Origins and integration of the soul complex into the new multi dimensional grid outside of space/time third dimension.

I would also like to talk to the publisher of this newsletter on my radio show.

aprilholloway's picture

Hi Deborah, Please email us through the Contact page (link on top menu) to discuss your proposals.

Regards,

April Holloway

 

Another case of unsupported dismissiveness. It's quite possible it's a natural formation, but if the computer generated graphic, above is an accurate representation, then I'd say the so-called experts were too quick to dismiss it.

Expeditions take money. I can understand the reticence of some scientists, but they should not dismiss it so easily. A more scientific and honest stance would be, "We don't know, but we're not going to spend the money to dig deeper."

Wouldn't it be wonderful if scientists were brave enough and humble enough to admit a lack of knowing rather than claiming it's natural? So much junk or pseudoscience is created by scientists when they don't take the same care and peer-review rigor to dismiss something as they do to support a thesis. Dismissal is given some special "blank check" of immunity allowing all manner of logical fallacies to be used and accepted.

Why is it so hard for so-called scientists to admit that they do not know as much as they think they do? When faced with an ancient building, which could not have been built in modern times, they sink to such platitudes as "out of place and out of time". Wouldn't it be easier to say, "Well, we'll just have to amend our thinking on this one"?

But science isn't a religion. Right? Right? lol

Peti Miklos's picture

And that's just it, there is no amended thinking allowed.

Studies done by various independent researchers covering a wide range of historical topics have been done, and these studies are laughed at, downplayed, thrown out, you name it, and all because they do not fit into the accepted view. Well, the accepted view is as false as that word could ever describe. 

What it is, is a supression of the truth. There are those who know what that truth is, and they are the ones who are supressing it. The truth is for them to know, and for you never to find out. 

The Great Pyramid of Geza is MUCH older then what is taught, and hasconnections with many other ancient monuments worldwide. The Exodus occured during the Middle Kingdom of Egypt, not during the New Kingdom under Ramesis II (try Ra-mosis). These are just two examples of what I speak ....

Does anyone ever wonder in studying the history of Ancient Egypt, with the beginning of the New Kingdom under the 18th Dynasty, why the name, or variations of the name "Mosis" is so popular amongst the Pharoahs ? Ahmose, Kamose, Tothmosis, and continuing with the 19th dynasty Ramesis/Ramosis. Remember, it follows the last Middle Kingdom dynasty, the 17th, which the 18th is actually a contiuation of. The name Mosis left an undelible mark on the minds of the Egyptians, it was a name attached to great power in meaning, a result of the Exodus occuring just previous in time.

Truth is not to be known by ordinary people because it shakes the very foundations of the accepted view, a view that is a lie that has been fostered upon us. Knowledge is power, and those who have power do not want to share it. 

Peti Miklos

Ugh don't drag religion into it, makes you sound uneducated and like a conspiracy nut

Peti Miklos's picture

Tell me birdlime, just where do you see anything about religion in my comment above ? Tell me, truly I would like to know !!

Furthermore, If I so choose to speak of religion, or of Adonai Elohim Yehovah, I will do so !!! .. And no one, especially some person with atheistic tendencies is going to tell me otherwise. Also, if I do, I will definitely sound much more educated than will ever be possible for you !!!!!

As far as “conspiracy nut” is concerned, I do not deal in conspiracies, I deal in FACTS !!!!

Peti Miklos

Never was an "exodus". Didn't happen. As a matter of FACT you can take the entirety of the Old Testament to be the myths of different cultures(Sumerians, Egyptian and Iranian etc) fraudulently knitted together to support the aspirations of one tribe that otherwise would be unheard of today.

SO True. You have to search to find the truth about humanity's past AND apply some common sense.

I think the whole content of the article is people saying they aren't sure what it is. How can you get to the truth without discussing the possibilities and the plus and negatives to the likelihood of each of those possibilities.

Why is it that some people automatically jump to the most fantastical conclusions and don't consider the more mundane explanations when confronted with something that isn't yet well explained. It's always some fantastic story about aliens or some ancient civilisations with technology compareable to todays as explanations for the unknown on this website.

The article makes no mention of the size of the "city". What's the scale on the picture?

It does sound like they are surpressing information once again as there are no answers WHATSOEVER! I bet you any money if you funded a private team of investigators & got the equipment there would be some kind of naval vessel (probably US) to greet you and turn you away (or shoot you knowing the military) or I bet you just couldn't get permission to go out there otherwise someone surely would have by now?!!

Peti Miklos's picture

Your absolutely right Rich, truth is surpressed. It is an old game played by those in power in order to retain the truth on certain subjects for themselves only. The people are to believe only that which they are told. This has only gone on for thousands of years, so if it comes as a surprise to anyone it is simply because they are totally unaware, and choose to remain unaware. This is called ignorance.

Peti Miklos

@ Rich Wright - if you intend to keep posting here, try to lay off the drugs.

Tsurugi's picture

Do you actually know anyone who isn't "on drugs" of one kind or another? Seems like everyone is on opiates or amphetamines or steroids or anti-depressants or anti-anxieties or ambien or xanax or ritalin or aderol or something, along with their normal daily caffeine and nicotine and sugar and alcohol. And of course there are the many internally concocted and administered cocktails of the human body, the adrenalines and the dopamines and the di-methyl-triptamines and whatnot....

So really, I'd suggest to you that, if you intend to keep posting here, you should be on some drugs. Join the human race. We were all trolls once, till we found psychedelics, some 30-40,000 years ago. You can do it too..

oh how I rolled
thanks for the laugh!

nothing new under the sun and all that jazzy suppression.

To April and everyone else: Just a heads up, If you go into Google Earth you will find the entire Golf of Guanahabibes has been smudged clean. Natural formations my a....!

aprilholloway's picture

Hi John, very interesting! Thanks for the update.

I guess the paradigm filter is operating again. Is R. J. Archer still operating his "Mega blog"? I seem to remember that Hemingway's brother Leicester reported spotting another site near Cuba (either north or south) from the air many years ago. The evidence of Yonaguni, the Gulf of Cambay, and other sites should be enough to re-write archeology. Surely there must be a billionaire out there with the balls to defy the establishment and properly investigate Mega.

Daniel Moore

The Pacific and Atlantic don't have the same sea level and Drake Passage was once a land bridge where the Antarctic Circumpolar current flows massive amounts of water to the Atlantic Ocean. I know there is the question of duration, but has anyone considered possible pre-Drake Passage into the equation on its own merits?

If we all want to know what is REALLY down there in the depths, just start a rumor saying there is gold down there, riches beyond your wildest dreams, then maybe you'll get something done, better yet, oil, lol. Even though we all know the real treasure is knowledge, though it seems to be an unviable commodity in this Neo Capitalist climate...

i say sunken city. where i live in northeast alabama was once an ocean. i have found numerous ancient
sea fossils in the 'chert' ridges around my home. and my house sits right at 1000 feet above sea level.
one theory, my own, that city was an island like the mayan history states and this area was an ocean
when the teutonic plates tilted. it didn't happen in a flash or take 50,000 years. i say more like a matter
of months. maybe a few years. but slow enough that the structures weren't subjected to as strong a
local earthquake as we may think. a bit off subject, but why was that point chosen as the start of
latitude and longitude mapping? why that particular point of 0n/0s x 0e/0w?

Google actively airbrushes the satellite views of the world map. You can see crystal clear images of the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico directly next to blurred airbrushed light blue. The oceans obviously rose drastically at some time in the past. The old 'land' masses are well defined. The gulf of Mexico was much smaller at some time in the distant past. When? Well, mainstream science isn't talking because that would upset their 'linear advancement' doctrine. It would also provide evidence of ancient cultures and destroy the biblical meme of the 5-6000 year old earth. Religion has a large stake in keeping ancient civilization out of the picture and covered up. If I were one of the weathiest institutions on the planet, and I made my fortune on lies, I'd labor to keep truth covered up too.

It's being ignored because it doesn't fit into 'science's party line'.

Register to become part of our active community, get updates, receive a monthly newsletter, and enjoy the benefits and rewards of our member point system OR just post your comment below as a Guest.

Our Mission

Ancient Origins seeks to uncover, what we believe, is one of the most important pieces of knowledge we can acquire as human beings – our beginnings.

While many believe that we already hold such knowledge, our view is that there still exists a multitude of anomalies and mysteries in humanity's past that deserve further examination.

We therefore wish to foster an open community that is dedicated to investigating, understanding and explaining the origins of our species on planet earth. To this end, we aim to organize, support and even finance efforts in this direction.

Our aim is to move beyond theories and to present a thorough examination of current research and evidence and to offer alternative viewpoints and explanations to those currently held by mainstream science and archaeology.

Come with us on a journey to explore lost civilisations, sacred writings, ancient places, unexplained artefacts and scientific mysteries while we seek to reconstruct and retell the story of our beginnings.

Ancient Image Galleries

Shrunken Head at Cuenca Museum - Ecuador (Image: Ancient Origins)
A large bronze head with protruding eyes believed to depict those of Cancong, the semi-legendary first king of Shu (Source: Wikipedia)
Next article