The desecrated royal coffin found in Tomb KV55.

The Mystery of Egyptian Tomb KV55 in the Valley of the Kings

(Read the article on one page)

In 1907, a mysterious tomb was discovered in Egypt. Known as KV55, the tomb contained a variety of artifacts and a single body. Identification of the body has been complicated by the fact that the artifacts appear to belong to several different individuals. It has been speculated that the tomb was created in a hurry, and that the individual buried there had been previously laid to rest elsewhere. With many different possibilities for the identity of the mummy – ranging from Queen Tiye (Akhenaten’s mother), to King Smenkhkare – researchers who set out to identify the mummy were presented with a puzzling challenge.

In January 1907, financier Theodore M. Davis had hired archaeologist Edward R. Ayrton and his team to conduct excavations in the Valley of the Kings in Egypt. The Valley of the Kings is an area in Egypt located on the West bank of the Nile River, across from the city of Thebes. Almost all of the pharaohs from Egypt’s “Golden Age” are buried in this famous valley.

Egypt’s famous Valley of the Kings.

Egypt’s famous Valley of the Kings. Source: BigStockPhoto

As Ayrton’s team was working on January 6, 1907, they discovered the entrance to a tomb – KV55. They notified Davis the next day, and began removing the rubble blocking the entrance. On January 9, Davis and Ayrton entered the tomb, accompanied by Joseph Lindon Smith and Arthur Weigall. Over the next few days they took photographs of the items within the tomb and began removing artifacts. By January 25, they were able to view and investigate the coffin and the skeletal mummy within the tomb.

The KV55 tomb is fairly small and simple. The entrance includes a flight of 20 stairs. At the time of the discovery, the entrance and stairs were covered by rubble which all had to be removed. A sloping corridor leads to the tomb, which contains a single chamber and a small niche. Within the tomb, at the time of discovery, were four canopic jars, a gilded wooden shrine, remains of boxes, seal impressions, a vase stand, pieces of furniture, a silver goose head, two clay bricks, and a single coffin. The coffin had been desecrated, with parts of the face having been removed.

Layout of Tomb KV55.

Layout of Tomb KV55. Wikimedia, CC BY-SA 3.0

Overall, the physical appearance of the tomb is unremarkable. However, the contents became more puzzling and mysterious as they were examined, as each piece appeared to be connected to different individuals. This made efforts to identify the remains within the tomb more difficult. According to some researchers, the presence of this variety of items indicates that whoever was entombed here was done so in a hurry, or possibly the individual was buried somewhere else, and then relocated to KV55 at a later date.

One of the four Egyptian alabaster canopic jars found in KV55, depicting what is thought to be the likeness of Queen Kiya.

One of the four Egyptian alabaster canopic jars found in KV55, depicting what is thought to be the likeness of Queen Kiya. Wikimedia, CC BY-SA 2.5

While identifying the remains in the tomb has been challenging, there are many clues in the items found within the tomb. Many of these items have been linked to King Akhenaten. The four canopic jars within the tomb were all empty. They contained effigies of four women, believed to be the daughters of Akhenaten, and may have been created for Kiya, one of Akhenaten’s wives. The gilded shrine appeared to have been created for Akhenaten’s mother, Queen Tiye. And Akhenaten’s name was on the two clay bricks.

Davis’ first impression, after in situ examinations were conducted by physicians, was that the remains belonged to Queen Tiye. Evidence that the remains were female included the positioning of the arms, post-mortem damage to the pelvis, and lack of male genitalia. Later it was proposed that the coffin could have belonged to Nefertiti, Meketaten, or Meritaten. Eventually, it was agreed that the coffin was initially created for Kiya. However, upon further study and tests of the remains, researchers concluded that the individual buried within the tomb was, in fact, male.

Profile view of the skull recovered from KV55.

Profile view of the skull recovered from KV55. Public Domain

Even after it was determined that the remains were those of a male, there remained questions as to who he was, and how old he was when he died. Scientific testing revealed that he may have been closely related to King Tutankhamen, who is believed to have been Akhenaten’s son.

Another theory was that the remains belonged to Smenkhkare, who may have been Akhenaten’s successor. The remains were first estimated to belong to a man who died around the age of 25, but it was later determined he would have been closer to 20 at the time of death.


The first thing i saw when looking at the pic of this skull was Akhenaten.This was my first sense when looking at the skull.Then from reading that he was such a divisive and radical figure that he was dumped there on purpose and with no real identifying artifacts because he was not to be remembered.Just as he was erased from all or most of the temples and monuments all over egypt.

Roberto Peron's picture

Nothing unusual about the skull?  It has an elongated snout like we find in chimps and gorillas!  Further, it looks to me like the jaw bone may not fit the skull.  Did someone get their skull parts mixed up OR was this done on purpose by the ancients for some unknown reason?  Akhenaten's anatomy is odd in itself with his elongated face and head, long skinny fingers, and odd body traits.  Regarding the skull found in this burial it also has a thick brow ridge!  Either someone got their skull parts mixed up or this "person" was something between an ape and human in my estimation.  

rbflooringinstall's picture

Its probably Akhenaten's tomb, and they are just trying to tease us.

Peace and Love,


It is interesting and puzzling still, though I think we can attribute some pretty ordinary things to what occurred at least with the hasty tomb business and defaced coffin. I bet dollars to sandcrabs that in the process of erasing the memory of Akhenaten from Egypt's memory. Followers still true to him may have interfered and stolen the coffin at the time of defacing and the few items they could get in their hands on. It makes sense that he wasn't a radical thinker as maybe a little tetched or imbalanced mentally and emotionally. The after life was everything to them, it would make perfect sense that those who loved him would do anything to protect his rightful place into the afterlife. Just a random ramble.

Peter Harrap's picture

In Egyptology, there is an assumption that some mummy "must be" somebody. These graves were regularly looted, robbed, desecrated. The skeleton is variously, 20 years old, 30 years old. Then it is a woman, then a man. I'm waiting for somebody to weigh in with "alien". It'll happen.

If the tales are true that Akhenaton was erased from history, as here and Velikovski (in Oedipus and Akhenaton) argued, adding that Tiye was walled up alive, etc, the first thing I would do if I wanted to make sure he never made it back would be to cremate his remains and put any old mummy in his place.

It never seems to occur to academics today that thousands of years ago people had imagination and vice equal to our own, and it must here surely be remembered that the so-called King's List is incomplete.

Whilst reading Velikovski's very interesting hypothesis years ago, it occurred to me to imagine that the incomplete Kings list was a cause of confusion such that Akhenaton and Tutankhamen were the same person, and that the incest tag label on a number of pharoahs is incorrect.

A number of identifiable diseases associated today with incest are also known in ordinary lineages where there is no record of incest at all, and Akhenaton might have changed his name to that of one of his children who had died, and reinstalled the old religion in order to atone for the death of that child whom he might have imagined the result of God's disfavour.

If you examine the King's Lists carefully and the accepted chronologies of the reigns of the different pharoahs there are equally a number of discrepancies, but it does not mean necessarily that the gaps are to be filled in the future by  "missing" pharoahs at all.

Then there are other possibilities. We are told so and so reigned 23 years. Or that so and so died aged 23.

Possible where the preceeding Pharoah was his mother. Possible where some bright spark of a scholar insisted they have got the length of a life correct when it is merely the length of a reign. Remember its all in a secret language we might not always be right about.

Why manufacture mysteries where we ignore the sad fact that there is NO evidence.

It may be that NO pharoah was EVER mummified at all. What the inscriptions SAY, may be untrue.

It ain't necessarily so...

Further, the statue may not resemble Akhenaton at ALL! As everything of him is supposed to have been obliterated any true likeness, contemporary with him in life would have been destroyed after his death. What point would there be rubbing out his name everywhere if you keep a damn great statue of him??

Above article gives an alternative view on KV55 and the mummy, which is likely not Ahkenaten.

during the time of Ramses I. they had all of his belongings removed from his tomb and place somewhere else. That coffin had a mask on it before it was reburied. if you look closly at the area in where the cartouche should be it says Kiya. all of those grave goods were meant for her but she was disgraced at Y16.

during the time of Ramses I. they had all of his belongings removed from his tomb and place somewhere else. That coffin had a mask on it before it was reburied. if you look closly at the area in where the cartouche should be it says Kiya. all of those grave goods were meant for her but she was disgraced at Y16.

Akhenaton was probably buried in his own city of Akhetaten - so this must have been a relocation of sorts like the mummy cache - such a Pharoah would not have had such a simple tomb & if Tut's tomb was anything to go by it must have been extremely sumptuous especially considering the aesthetics of the 18th Dynasty see Nerfertiti's bust . They do not say the body disintegrated upon opening the coffin ....also there was a lot of water damage. As the first man to worship One God in history - Akhenaton was definitely different and physically extremely different......maybe a hybrid 'giant'......anyways his images although defaced and shattered survived in rubble and in the abandoned City at Tel Amarna and used for Temple filling at Karnak for posterity. Akhenaton was propablynthe inspiration for later Judaism - many of the verses in the tombs of Amarna are later reflected in Psalms .....and his link to Yuya the Wizier ( Joseph ???) it's all which came first the chicken or the egg......& his Queen Nerfertiti well on a side note it has been noted that more Brits share DNA with Tut's and thus by default Akhenaton than modern Egyptians.

I guess the egyptians didnt at all think about rain out there, since they had their sarcophagus' at the bottom, where rain would fill it in. but then how would it dry out ? or drain off ?
why wouldn't they have had some kind of water pit ? After all they knew he would be down there in the underworld, therefore why not have the assumption that rain may come some day and ruin all they were preparing..? They thought of soo many things too..

Just a couple of years ago DNA tests of many of the Amarna royals were done. To the best if my recollection the mummy in KV 55 was related to Khia. Nothing accurate is known when Akhenaten died, however it is known that he was never buried in the tomb prepared for him in Amaranth. Since he and his immediate family were so hated it is probable that burials were done hurried and in secret.
I want the KV 55 mummy to be Shmenkare. He died before Tut who had this sumptuous burial that also had many burial articles that were supposedly intended for Nefertiti. Since it is assumed that Tut's tomb has two more hiddden rooms, if those are opened we may have better information about this whole affair.

Register to become part of our active community, get updates, receive a monthly newsletter, and enjoy the benefits and rewards of our member point system OR just post your comment below as a Guest.

Our Mission

At Ancient Origins, we believe that one of the most important fields of knowledge we can pursue as human beings is our beginnings. And while some people may seem content with the story as it stands, our view is that there exists countless mysteries, scientific anomalies and surprising artifacts that have yet to be discovered and explained.

The goal of Ancient Origins is to highlight recent archaeological discoveries, peer-reviewed academic research and evidence, as well as offering alternative viewpoints and explanations of science, archaeology, mythology, religion and history around the globe.

We’re the only Pop Archaeology site combining scientific research with out-of-the-box perspectives.

By bringing together top experts and authors, this archaeology website explores lost civilizations, examines sacred writings, tours ancient places, investigates ancient discoveries and questions mysterious happenings. Our open community is dedicated to digging into the origins of our species on planet earth, and question wherever the discoveries might take us. We seek to retell the story of our beginnings. 

Ancient Image Galleries

View from the Castle Gate (Burgtor). (Public Domain)
Door surrounded by roots of Tetrameles nudiflora in the Khmer temple of Ta Phrom, Angkor temple complex, located today in Cambodia. (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Cable car in the Xihai (West Sea) Grand Canyon (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Next article